---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101124/
---
(Updated April 16, 2011, 4:41 a.m.)
Review request for kdelibs.
Changes
2011/4/15 Ingo Klöcker :
> On Friday 15 April 2011, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 09:24:47AM -0400, Dawit Alemayehu wrote:
>> > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Maksim Orlovich
> wrote:
>> > > Ah, I misread the default. But still, I don't think we want to
>> > > send DNT:0 i
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Thomas Lübking
wrote:
> Am 15.04.2011, 21:00 Uhr, schrieb Ingo Klöcker :
>
>>> that's not a very wise default. if too many people will use it (*),
>>> the data miners will just ignore the standard, based on the rightful
>>> claim that most people didn't even explic
On Friday 15 April 2011, Vladimir Koković wrote:
> HI,
>
> Please, return removed Konqueror feature bug (embedded advanced text
> editor) in KDE 4.6 !!!
Wrong list, and wrong request.
We didn't remove such a feature. If it doesn't appear anymore, then it must
mean you don't have katepart instal
On 03/05/2011 11:32 AM, Andriy Rysin wrote:
There seems to be plenty info on saving/restoring sessions for
applications (i.e. the features in KApplication and KMainWindow
classes) but I'd like to save/restore some information in KDED module
(keyboard layouts to be exact) but only if restore ses
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101082/#review2665
---
This review has been submitted with commit
00c625102246780e5b37
Am 15.04.2011, 21:00 Uhr, schrieb Ingo Klöcker :
that's not a very wise default. if too many people will use it (*),
the data miners will just ignore the standard, based on the rightful
claim that most people didn't even explicitly say they don't want to
be tracked.
Sorry, but this argumentati
On Friday 15 April 2011, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 09:24:47AM -0400, Dawit Alemayehu wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Maksim Orlovich
wrote:
> > > Ah, I misread the default. But still, I don't think we want to
> > > send DNT:0 if the user unchecks the checkbox
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 09:24:47AM -0400, Dawit Alemayehu wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Maksim Orlovich wrote:
>> > Ah, I misread the default. But still, I don't think we want to send
>> > DNT:0 if the user unchecks the che
> On April 12, 2011, 9:26 p.m., Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > looks good; other code using this might Do The Right Thing(tm) as well, but
> > it's good to centralize these checks.
It is the way to go imho (centralize this checks)
- Alex
--
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101082/#review2661
---
This review has been submitted with commit
1855d5963c4fdbc96456
HI,
Please, return removed Konqueror feature bug (embedded advanced text
editor) in KDE 4.6 !!!
Best regards,
Vladimir Kokovic, Dragan Ciric, DP seniors, Belgrade, Serbia
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 09:24:47AM -0400, Dawit Alemayehu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Maksim Orlovich wrote:
> > Ah, I misread the default. But still, I don't think we want to send
> > DNT:0 if the user unchecks the checkbox, given how the label is worded
> > -- IMHO we wouldn't want
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Maksim Orlovich wrote:
> Ah, I misread the default. But still, I don't think we want to send
> DNT:0 if the user unchecks the checkbox, given how the label is worded
> -- IMHO we wouldn't want to send the header at all.
That makes no sense especially since not sen
14 matches
Mail list logo
