On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Christoph Bartoschek wrote:
> Am Sonntag 20 März 2011 schrieb todd rme:
>> Just out of curiosity, what widget style is being used for the
>> screenshots?
>
> This should be oxygen from KDE 4.4
Is it a problem that the dialog doesn't look like a native dialog? It
Am Sonntag 20 März 2011 schrieb todd rme:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 4:02 PM, John Layt wrote:
> > On Sunday 20 Mar 2011 17:48:09 Christoph Bartoschek wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> do you refer to the dialog I see for one of our printers? Which
> >> options do you want to see? The "General" tab?
> >
Am Sonntag 20 März 2011 schrieb John Layt:
> Hi,
>
> Some very good points, some definately belong in the dialog, others belong
> in CUPS itself, but I'll take them all with me as everyone will be at the
> summit.
For me as user it does not matter where it is implemented. However I think
this al
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 4:02 PM, John Layt wrote:
> On Sunday 20 Mar 2011 17:48:09 Christoph Bartoschek wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> do you refer to the dialog I see for one of our printers? Which options do
>> you want to see? The "General" tab?
>>
>> By the way, is there any reason to prevent resizing
On Sunday 20 Mar 2011 17:48:09 Christoph Bartoschek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> do you refer to the dialog I see for one of our printers? Which options do
> you want to see? The "General" tab?
>
> By the way, is there any reason to prevent resizing of the dialog?
>
> I've disabled this and made 3 screens
On Sunday 20 Mar 2011 16:50:22 todd rme wrote:
> In general it would be nice to see screenshots of the available
> options and how they are laid out.
>
> -Todd
I'd post some but for two problems. 1) It segfaults on my machine right now,
some Qt issue 2) The ui interaction is really not close t
Hi,
Some very good points, some definately belong in the dialog, others belong in
CUPS itself, but I'll take them all with me as everyone will be at the summit.
> - My biggest wish for a printing dialog is that the preview exactly matches
> the output. All current print dialogs that I know on li
Am Sonntag 20 März 2011 schrieb Christoph Bartoschek:
> I've disabled this and made 3 screenshots showing the general dialog.
>
> http://www.pontohonk.de/screenshots/cpd-1.png
> http://www.pontohonk.de/screenshots/cpd-2.png
> http://www.pontohonk.de/screenshots/cpd-3.png
The screenshots show ano
Am Sonntag 20 März 2011 schrieb todd rme:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Christoph Bartoschek
>
> wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch 16 März 2011 schrieb John Layt:
> >> [1]
> >>
> >> https://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/openprinting/ope
> >> npr
> >>
> >> inting- summit-san-francisc
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Christoph Bartoschek
wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 16 März 2011 schrieb John Layt:
>
>> [1]
>
>> https://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/openprinting/openpr
>
>> inting- summit-san-francisco-2011
>
>> [2]
>
>> http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workg
On Sunday, 20 de March de 2011 15:09:26 Andreas Hartmetz wrote:
> On Sunday 20 March 2011 14:38:40 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Can you please be careful and do not create incorrectly 4.6 branches in
> > places where the branch is called KDE/4.6 (e.g kdelibs and kde-runtime)
> >
> > Ian can you ki
On Sunday 20 March 2011, Parker Coates wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:57, Ian Monroe wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 09:45, John Tapsell wrote:
> >> Why do we let people create branches on the main git server
> >> anyway?
> >
> > Well for feature branches its fine and kind of the point of
On 03/20/2011 04:17 PM, John Tapsell wrote:
By having it in your own git repository. This is how Qt does it.
Anyone can clone the Qt repository on the server and create branches
in their own clone.
For example, here is mine: http://qt.gitorious.org/~johnflux- and
other people can (and do) w
On Sunday 20 Mar 2011 15:02:49 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Sunday 20 March 2011, Parker Coates wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:09, Andreas Hartmetz wrote:
> > > On Sunday 20 March 2011 14:38:40 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > >> Can you please be careful and do not create incorrectly 4.6 bran
On 20 March 2011 15:01, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> A Diumenge, 20 de març de 2011, John Tapsell va escriure:
>> Why do we let people create branches on the main git server anyway?
>
> How are you supposed to work on a feature-branch otherwise?
By having it in your own git repository. This is how
On Sunday 20 March 2011 15:59:55 Parker Coates wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:09, Andreas Hartmetz wrote:
> > On Sunday 20 March 2011 14:38:40 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> >> Can you please be careful and do not create incorrectly 4.6 branches in
> >> places where the branch is called KDE/4.6 (e
On Sunday 20 March 2011, Parker Coates wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:09, Andreas Hartmetz wrote:
> > On Sunday 20 March 2011 14:38:40 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> >> Can you please be careful and do not create incorrectly 4.6 branches in
> >> places where the branch is called KDE/4.6 (e.g kdeli
On Sunday 20 Mar 2011 14:28:11 Andreas Hartmetz wrote:
> On Sunday 20 March 2011 15:17:11 Ian Monroe wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 09:09, Andreas Hartmetz
wrote:
> > > On Sunday 20 March 2011 14:38:40 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > >> Can you please be careful and do not create incorrectly 4.6
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:57, Ian Monroe wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 09:45, John Tapsell wrote:
>> Why do we let people create branches on the main git server anyway?
>
> Well for feature branches its fine and kind of the point of git.
> There's no reason to let non-admins create version bran
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:09, Andreas Hartmetz wrote:
> On Sunday 20 March 2011 14:38:40 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
>> Can you please be careful and do not create incorrectly 4.6 branches in
>> places where the branch is called KDE/4.6 (e.g kdelibs and kde-runtime)
>>
>> Ian can you kill them?
>
> M
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 09:45, John Tapsell wrote:
> Why do we let people create branches on the main git server anyway?
>
Well for feature branches its fine and kind of the point of git.
There's no reason to let non-admins create version branches though.
Ian
A Diumenge, 20 de març de 2011, John Tapsell va escriure:
> Why do we let people create branches on the main git server anyway?
How are you supposed to work on a feature-branch otherwise?
Albert
Why do we let people create branches on the main git server anyway?
On Sunday 20 March 2011 15:17:11 Ian Monroe wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 09:09, Andreas Hartmetz wrote:
> > On Sunday 20 March 2011 14:38:40 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> >> Can you please be careful and do not create incorrectly 4.6 branches in
> >> places where the branch is called KDE/4.6 (e.g
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 09:09, Andreas Hartmetz wrote:
> On Sunday 20 March 2011 14:38:40 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
>> Can you please be careful and do not create incorrectly 4.6 branches in
>> places where the branch is called KDE/4.6 (e.g kdelibs and kde-runtime)
>>
>> Ian can you kill them?
>>
>
On Sunday 20 March 2011 14:38:40 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Can you please be careful and do not create incorrectly 4.6 branches in
> places where the branch is called KDE/4.6 (e.g kdelibs and kde-runtime)
>
> Ian can you kill them?
>
> Albert
Maybe we can go through with renaming the branches t
Am Mittwoch 16 März 2011 schrieb John Layt:
> [1]
> https://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/openprinting/openpr
> inting- summit-san-francisco-2011
> [2]
> http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/openprinting/commonp
> rintingdialog
Hi,
I'm very happy to read that the
On Sunday 20 Mar 2011 13:09:33 Tom Albers wrote:
> I've deleted kde-print mailinglist and made John the admin of
> kde-print-devel. Password sent in private mail.
>
> Thanks both!
>
> Best,
Thanks Tom!
And many thanks to Cristian for his years of service as moderator, it's
appreciated.
John.
Can you please be careful and do not create incorrectly 4.6 branches in places
where the branch is called KDE/4.6 (e.g kdelibs and kde-runtime)
Ian can you kill them?
Albert
Hi,
- Original Message -
> On March 10, 2011 12:49:16 John Layt wrote:
> > I've offered previously to mod those lists, I'd be happy to take
> > them on
> > now. I think I also previously said we can get rid of the kde-print
> > list,
> > it's had about 5 mails in the 18 months so I don't t
30 matches
Mail list logo
