On Wednesday 02 March 2011 15:31:21 Anders Lund wrote:
> On Onsdag den 2. marts 2011, Stefan Majewsky wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
> > > what about having two config file, a primary one that is the "real one"
> > > and a set of secondary ones that can be loaded a
> On May 12, 2010, 1:33 p.m., Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > > But on the other hand I can suggest probably a better place for this -
> > > kdm itself ;)
> > >
> > no, it may very well make sense to accept way more than what should be
> > permitted via the kcm. in fact, my own local setup is tot
> On May 12, 2010, 1:33 p.m., Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > > But on the other hand I can suggest probably a better place for this -
> > > kdm itself ;)
> > >
> > no, it may very well make sense to accept way more than what should be
> > permitted via the kcm. in fact, my own local setup is tot
On Onsdag den 2. marts 2011, Stefan Majewsky wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
> > what about having two config file, a primary one that is the "real one"
> > and a set of secondary ones that can be loaded and changed on the fly
> > depending on activity change?
>
> Pe
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
> what about having two config file, a primary one that is the "real one" and a
> set of secondary ones that can be loaded and changed on the fly depending on
> activity change?
Perfectly possible from the technical side thanks to KConfig, but:
On Sunday 27 February 2011, Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > however, i don't think it's the right place for it
> > depends here why we want multiple configuration files.
> > to have things like a different set of bookmarks, a different set of file
> > open some mail folders hidden? that
