Re: Kephal status

2011-02-27 Thread Ingo Klöcker
On Sunday 27 February 2011, Giulio Camuffo wrote: > 2011/2/27 Θεόφιλος Ιντζόγλου > > > Hi, > > I would like to know the status of the kephal lib. It seems to be > > in a state > > where it cannot be used outside of the kde-workspace package. I > > have already > > provided some patches in bug #26

Re: Profiles for all KDE-applications

2011-02-27 Thread Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé
Hi! > however, i don't think it's the right place for it > depends here why we want multiple configuration files. > to have things like a different set of bookmarks, a different set of file > open some mail folders hidden? that's something for activities, yes, but > not to be achieved by the means

Re: Kephal status

2011-02-27 Thread Θεόφιλος Ιντζόγλου
On Sunday 27 of February 2011 22:23:04 Giulio Camuffo wrote: > 2011/2/27 Θεόφιλος Ιντζόγλου > > > Hi, > > I would like to know the status of the kephal lib. It seems to be in a > > state > > where it cannot be used outside of the kde-workspace package. I have > > already > > provided some patches

Re: Kephal status

2011-02-27 Thread Giulio Camuffo
2011/2/27 Θεόφιλος Ιντζόγλου > Hi, > I would like to know the status of the kephal lib. It seems to be in a > state > where it cannot be used outside of the kde-workspace package. I have > already > provided some patches in bug #266685 > (https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=266685) but those don

Kephal status

2011-02-27 Thread Θεόφιλος Ιντζόγλου
Hi, I would like to know the status of the kephal lib. It seems to be in a state where it cannot be used outside of the kde-workspace package. I have already provided some patches in bug #266685 (https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=266685) but those don't really fix the problem as they only ma

Re: Minor Point Relase Policy

2011-02-27 Thread Anders Lund
On Søndag den 27. februar 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > I'm sure you do not mean > > > > > > > > "These releases must only contain: > > Severe bugs: security vulnerabilities, severe regressions from previous > > > > releases, data loss bugs" > > Added a "Fixes for" in front. Yes, that look

Re: Minor Point Relase Policy

2011-02-27 Thread Albert Astals Cid
A Diumenge, 27 de febrer de 2011, Anders Lund va escriure: > On Søndag den 27. februar 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Hi, the release-team has written a minor point release policy for KDE > > main modules. > > > > You can find it at > > http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Minor_Point_Release_Poli

Re: Minor Point Relase Policy

2011-02-27 Thread Anders Lund
On Søndag den 27. februar 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Hi, the release-team has written a minor point release policy for KDE main > modules. > > You can find it at > http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Minor_Point_Release_Policy > > As far as we know it covers what we already do, just makes it a

Re: [GSOC?] Porting KDELibs to Android

2011-02-27 Thread Lydia Pintscher
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 16:37, Markus Slopianka wrote: > I can't speak for the others but IMO the GSOC program introduced an unhealthy > attitude > into FOSS: > Get into a FOSS project solely for the money, patch something up in pre-alpha > quality > that's not yet good enough to be merged into

Re: Profiles for all KDE-applications

2011-02-27 Thread Marco Martin
On Saturday 26 February 2011, Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé wrote: > todd rme wrote: > > Couldn't this be handled with activities? > > Graphical integration into the activities-concept would be probably nice, > but actiities do not provide an implementation for multiple configuration- > files. well, an

Re: [GSOC?] Porting KDELibs to Android

2011-02-27 Thread Markus Slopianka
I can't speak for the others but IMO the GSOC program introduced an unhealthy attitude into FOSS: Get into a FOSS project solely for the money, patch something up in pre-alpha quality that's not yet good enough to be merged into the main tree, and leave after the money is collected. While I'

Minor Point Relase Policy

2011-02-27 Thread Albert Astals Cid
Hi, the release-team has written a minor point release policy for KDE main modules. You can find it at http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Minor_Point_Release_Policy As far as we know it covers what we already do, just makes it a bit more official and standarized. Albert

Re: [GSOC?] Porting KDELibs to Android

2011-02-27 Thread Ingo Klöcker
On Sunday, February 27, 2011, Tsiapaliwkas Giorgos wrote: > hello, > > i don't know how relevant are these two,but take a look at that, > > http://lists.kde.org/?l=kdepim-users&m=129805559206418&w=2 > > On Sunday, February 27, 2011 06:53:47 AM Matthew Dawson wrote: > > Also is there any interes

Re: [GSOC?] Porting KDELibs to Android

2011-02-27 Thread Tsiapaliwkas Giorgos
hello, i don't know how relevant are these two,but take a look at that, http://lists.kde.org/?l=kdepim-users&m=129805559206418&w=2 On Sunday, February 27, 2011 06:53:47 AM Matthew Dawson wrote: > Also is there any interest in having a GSOC involving said port? for the moment there isn't such a