Stefan Majewsky wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>> which begs the question: "is KConfig (as ane exmple) platform or app
>> dev"? fun conversations to be had and digging to be done :)
>
> From my experience, KConfig is actually two things at once:
>
> 1. framework
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Lydia Pintscher wrote:
> Heya folks :)
>
> We have 20 days left until org application opens for GSoC 2011. By
> that point we should have as many rocking ideas as possible on this
> wiki page: http://community.kde.org/GSoC/2011/Ideas It will be used
> to evaluate o
Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Am 2/16/2011 22:10, schrieb Stephen Kelly:
>> As one of the people asked to describe my idea of the workflow (which
>> should
>> focus on rebasing, not merging) I put write up here:
>>
>> http://community.kde.org/20110213_GitWorkflowAgenda/StevesIdea
>>
>> http://thread.g
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100675/
---
Review request for kdelibs.
Summary
---
The existing KDE_COLOR_DEBUG
On Wednesday 16 February 2011 12:58:48 John Layt wrote:
> I want to make a start on some of the Git recipe and reference
> documentation as things occur to me, and was thinking a central
> http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Git hub page leading off to the various
> tutorial, policy, recipe, sysadm
A Dijous, 17 de febrer de 2011, Ralf Habacker va escriure:
> Am 16.02.2011 20:40, schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
> > Why?
>
> I'm currently the only reviewer for windows and I reviewed the code
> already :-)
You failed to find out you are not correctly loading the translation catalog.
Albert
>
> R
On 17.02.11 13:43:11, Stefan Majewsky wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > which begs the question: "is KConfig (as ane exmple) platform or app dev"?
> > fun
> > conversations to be had and digging to be done :)
>
> From my experience, KConfig is actually two thing
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> If someone writes 100 commits and pushes them without review then that's a
> social problem.
I was referring to the case when a feature branch gets moved between
repositories (e.g. a personal clone and the master repo). Review can
only happ
Am 2/17/2011 12:10, schrieb Andreas Hartmetz:
> On Thursday 17 February 2011 09:01:05 Johannes Sixt wrote:
>> When you develop a new feature, it is a very important choice on which
>> version of the software you base it on. I am advocating to base a feature
>> on a well-known, stable state. If you
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> which begs the question: "is KConfig (as ane exmple) platform or app dev"? fun
> conversations to be had and digging to be done :)
>From my experience, KConfig is actually two things at once:
1. framework for reading and writing INI-like f
On Thursday 17 February 2011 09:01:05 Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Am 2/16/2011 22:10, schrieb Stephen Kelly:
> > As one of the people asked to describe my idea of the workflow (which
> > should focus on rebasing, not merging) I put write up here:
> >
> > http://community.kde.org/20110213_GitWorkflowAg
Alle giovedì 17 febbraio 2011, Ralf Habacker ha scritto:
> Am 17.02.2011 09:32, schrieb Pino Toscano:
> > Alle giovedì 17 febbraio 2011, Ralf Habacker ha scritto:
> >> Am 17.02.2011 09:18, schrieb Ralf Habacker:
> >>> Am 16.02.2011 20:40, schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
> Why?
> >>>
> >>> I'm curr
Am 17.02.2011 09:32, schrieb Pino Toscano:
Alle giovedì 17 febbraio 2011, Ralf Habacker ha scritto:
Am 17.02.2011 09:18, schrieb Ralf Habacker:
Am 16.02.2011 20:40, schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
Why?
I'm currently the only reviewer for windows and I reviewed the code
already :-)
If you insist o
Alle giovedì 17 febbraio 2011, Ralf Habacker ha scritto:
> Am 17.02.2011 09:18, schrieb Ralf Habacker:
> > Am 16.02.2011 20:40, schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
> >> Why?
> >
> > I'm currently the only reviewer for windows and I reviewed the code
> > already :-)
>
> If you insist on following the forma
Am 17.02.2011 09:18, schrieb Ralf Habacker:
Am 16.02.2011 20:40, schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
Why?
I'm currently the only reviewer for windows and I reviewed the code
already :-)
If you insist on following the formal process I can submit a review
request and will do the review
Regards
Ralf
Am 16.02.2011 20:40, schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
Why?
I'm currently the only reviewer for windows and I reviewed the code
already :-)
Ralf
Am 2/16/2011 22:10, schrieb Stephen Kelly:
> As one of the people asked to describe my idea of the workflow (which should
> focus on rebasing, not merging) I put write up here:
>
> http://community.kde.org/20110213_GitWorkflowAgenda/StevesIdea
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.scm-inte
17 matches
Mail list logo