On Tuesday 25 January 2011 20.36.54 Ian Monroe wrote:
> The basic schedule will be that sometime on Saturday the repos listed
> in the subject will be made read-only, we'll make the conversion and
> upload them to git.kde.org. The subversion directories will be emptied
> and replaced with a README.
The basic schedule will be that sometime on Saturday the repos listed
in the subject will be made read-only, we'll make the conversion and
upload them to git.kde.org. The subversion directories will be emptied
and replaced with a README.
*Both* the 4.6 and trunk branches are moving.
For up to one
hi all ...
just as a heads up, thanks to the efforts of Nicolás Alvarez and the support
of KDE sys admin, kdeexamples is now in git.
the result is that you can find KDE Examples on projects.kde.org and clone it
with "git clone git://anongit.kde.org/kdeexamples" or (for read-write access)
"git
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6401/
---
(Updated Jan. 25, 2011, 9:30 a.m.)
Review request for kdelibs, Kevin Ottens
> On Jan. 25, 2011, 6:59 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > Sounds mostly good, I'm just wondering why you keep calling the
> > updateRowRange in the slots connected to both rowsRemoved and
> > rowsAboutToBeRemoved. Wouldn't doing it only once for one of those signals
> > only be enough?
I think i
On Tuesday 25 January 2011 18:14:45 Marco Martin wrote:
> Hi all,
> now the kdeedu packages kinda build on the MeeGo obs, was mostly porting the
> kparts usage from the kpart genericfactory to the k plugin factory...
>
> mostly.
> some applications (blinken, kwordquiz, kig, parley) depend on the k
Hi all,
now the kdeedu packages kinda build on the MeeGo obs, was mostly porting the
kparts usage from the kpart genericfactory to the k plugin factory...
mostly.
some applications (blinken, kwordquiz, kig, parley) depend on the kutils
library, that seems to be disabled in the mobile profile, wh
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6401/#review9718
---
Ship it!
OK on my side.
- Kevin
On Jan. 25, 2011, 9:30 a.m., T
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6401/#review9717
---
- Kevin
On Jan. 25, 2011, 9:30 a.m., Thomas Richard wrote:
>
>
> On Jan. 25, 2011, 6:59 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > Sounds mostly good, I'm just wondering why you keep calling the
> > updateRowRange in the slots connected to both rowsRemoved and
> > rowsAboutToBeRemoved. Wouldn't doing it only once for one of those signals
> > only be enough?
>
> Thoma
10 matches
Mail list logo