Re: Akonadi, Attica and Soprano moved to git.kde.org

2011-01-11 Thread Pavel Heimlich, a.k.a. hajma
2010/11/4 Alexander Neundorf : > On Wednesday 27 October 2010, Pavel Heimlich, a.k.a. hajma wrote: >> 2010/10/26 Christophe Giboudeaux : >> > Hi, >> > >> > This week, Akonadi, Attica and Soprano moved from the KDE SVN repo to >> > our new Git one. >> > >> > This means you should update your local c

Re: kdewebkit fails to build with Mobile profile in trunk

2011-01-11 Thread Marijn Kruisselbrink
On Tuesday, January 11, 2011 09:55:54 am Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Tuesday 11 January 2011 02:31:35 Marijn Kruisselbrink wrote: > > [1] > > https://build.pub.meego.com/package/view_file?file=02_kdelibs_compile.pat > > ch > > &package=kdelibs&project=home%3Amkruisselbrink%3Akde&srcmd5=20a6530bdfdd >

Re: kdewebkit fails to build with Mobile profile in trunk

2011-01-11 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Tuesday 11 January 2011 21:49:09 Dawit A wrote: > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > On Tuesday 11 January 2011 02:31:35 Marijn Kruisselbrink wrote: > >> [1] > >> https://build.pub.meego.com/package/view_file?file=02_kdelibs_compile.pa > >> tch > >> &package=kdelibs&proje

kdebindings 4.7 was modularized and has now moved to Git

2011-01-11 Thread Ian Monroe
KDE Bindings 4.7 has moved to Git. Hooray! You can browse through the projects at: https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdebindings 4.6 will continue to be developed in SVN. We still need to update some docs on Techbase and such. Thanks, Ian

Re: Review Request: Fix the inability to put an ioslave on hold when using the KIO-QNAM integration class...

2011-01-11 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2011, 22:05:49 schrieb Dawit Alemayehu: > > On 2011-01-05 11:11:06, Andrea Diamantini wrote: > > > trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kdewebkit/kwebpage.cpp, line 98 > > > > > ine98> > > > > > > I studied a bit the te

Re: kdewebkit fails to build with Mobile profile in trunk

2011-01-11 Thread Dawit A
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Tuesday 11 January 2011 02:31:35 Marijn Kruisselbrink wrote: >> [1] >> https://build.pub.meego.com/package/view_file?file=02_kdelibs_compile.patch >> &package=kdelibs&project=home%3Amkruisselbrink%3Akde&srcmd5=20a6530bdfdd79b >> d06c3ace11

Re: kdewebkit fails to build with Mobile profile in trunk

2011-01-11 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Tuesday 11 January 2011 02:31:35 Marijn Kruisselbrink wrote: > [1] > https://build.pub.meego.com/package/view_file?file=02_kdelibs_compile.patch > &package=kdelibs&project=home%3Amkruisselbrink%3Akde&srcmd5=20a6530bdfdd79b > d06c3ace11c7f0f96 Anyone with that issue could test the attached patch

Re: kdewebkit fails to build with Mobile profile in trunk

2011-01-11 Thread Marijn Kruisselbrink
On Monday, January 10, 2011 02:08:30 pm Dawit A wrote: > On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Andriy Rysin wrote: > > Commenting out two deprecated methods helped but that's probably a wrong > > solution. > > > > In file included from > > /home/kdeuser/work/OSS/KDE/kdelibs/kdewebkit/kgraphicswebview.

Re: Krazy: prefix vs. postfix ++ and -- operators

2011-01-11 Thread Artur de Souza
Quoting Rafa? Mi?ecki : Doesn't compiler optimize than anyway, when possible (like inside for)? I was told that when I tried using post incr. in kernel. You're right. Most of the compilers take care of that today, so you don't have to worry about this anymore. Of course you can defend one or

Review Request: Make KFileDialog update saved file type based on extension also for non-mimetype based filters

2011-01-11 Thread Lubos Lunak
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6325/ --- Review request for kdelibs, Rafael Fernández López and David Faure. Summary

Re: Krazy: prefix vs. postfix ++ and -- operators

2011-01-11 Thread Rafał Miłecki
W dniu 11 stycznia 2011 16:25 użytkownik Rafał Miłecki napisał: > 2011/1/11 Christoph Feck : >> Krazy says: >> >> "You should use ++ and -- as prefix whenever possible as these are more >> efficient than postfix operators. Prefix increments first and then uses the >> variable, postfix uses the act

Re: Krazy: prefix vs. postfix ++ and -- operators

2011-01-11 Thread Rafał Miłecki
2011/1/11 Christoph Feck : > Krazy says: > > "You should use ++ and -- as prefix whenever possible as these are more > efficient than postfix operators. Prefix increments first and then uses the > variable, postfix uses the actual; the variable is incremented as well. > Because of this, the prefix

Re: Krazy: prefix vs. postfix ++ and -- operators

2011-01-11 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 11.01.11 16:16:23, Christoph Feck wrote: > Krazy says: > > "You should use ++ and -- as prefix whenever possible as these are more > efficient than postfix operators. Prefix increments first and then uses the > variable, postfix uses the actual; the variable is incremented as well. > Because

Krazy: prefix vs. postfix ++ and -- operators

2011-01-11 Thread Christoph Feck
Krazy says: "You should use ++ and -- as prefix whenever possible as these are more efficient than postfix operators. Prefix increments first and then uses the variable, postfix uses the actual; the variable is incremented as well. Because of this, the prefix operators are inherently more effic