On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> At Sat, 1 Jan 2011 21:25:23 + (UTC),
> Tom Albers wrote:
>> 40 kdelibs-bugs
>> 28 plasma-bugs
>
> Aren't these the default assignees for most kdelibs and plasma bugs?
> Would they then be assigned to unassigned-b...@?
Ye
On 1/2/2011 12:58 AM, Milian Wolff wrote:
Or alternatively something like a two-stage development account, where the
initial padawan status only allows for comitting in the personal scratch pad
but also needs the OK by an existing person.
Something that I think -could- work (but also needs a lo
Eike Hein, 02.01.2011:
> On 1/2/2011 12:21 AM, Milian Wolff wrote:
> > See above, this is nothing I ever wanted to change. I only speak about
> > scratchpad (or what was playground).
> >
> > Hope this makes it clear that most of your email is just not relevant.
>
> I'm referring to this paragraph
On 1/2/2011 12:21 AM, Milian Wolff wrote:
See above, this is nothing I ever wanted to change. I only speak about
scratchpad (or what was playground).
Hope this makes it clear that most of your email is just not relevant.
I'm referring to this paragraph:
"It's also a mechanism to ensure that s
- Original Message -
> At Sat, 1 Jan 2011 21:25:23 + (UTC),
> Tom Albers wrote:
> > 40 kdelibs-bugs
> > 28 plasma-bugs
>
> Aren't these the default assignees for most kdelibs and plasma bugs?
Might be.
> Would they then be assigned to unassigned-b...@?
No, they will be ass
Eike Hein, 02.01.2011:
> On 1/1/2011 11:37 PM, Milian Wolff wrote:
> > Sorry but how is this related to my proposal? I didn't ask for "give
> > developer access to anyone", but only for *scratchpad* repos for
> > everyone. There is a huge difference here, don't you see that?
>
> You asked a questi
On 1/1/2011 11:37 PM, Milian Wolff wrote:
Sorry but how is this related to my proposal? I didn't ask for "give developer
access to anyone", but only for *scratchpad* repos for everyone. There is a
huge difference here, don't you see that?
You asked a question about how the KDE contribution proc
Eike Hein, 01.01.2011:
> On 1/1/2011 10:28 PM, Milian Wolff wrote:
> > Is this how it should be? How was this in SVN times? Did people also
> > start new work somewhere else and waited for the time it was
> > kde-review-able to merge it into KDE?
>
> The policy to get a KDE developer account (-> w
At Sat, 1 Jan 2011 21:25:23 + (UTC),
Tom Albers wrote:
> 40 kdelibs-bugs
> 28 plasma-bugs
Aren't these the default assignees for most kdelibs and plasma bugs?
Would they then be assigned to unassigned-b...@?
On 1/1/2011 10:28 PM, Milian Wolff wrote:
Is this how it should be? How was this in SVN times? Did people also start new
work somewhere else and waited for the time it was kde-review-able to merge it
into KDE?
The policy to get a KDE developer account (-> write access to all
of SVN, and now als
- Original Message -
> > Note that if you object, you are volunteering for taking over
> > moderation.
>
> > 42 quanta
> > 32 quanta-devel
>
> Make me the admin/moderator of these two please.
Done. Thanks.
--
Tom Albers
KDE Sysadmin
Tom Albers, 01.01.2011:
> Hi,
>
> These are the top mailinglists with the most amount of moderation requests.
> For most of them we have tried to contact the current moderators without
> much success last year. So now I suggest we get rid of these mailinglists.
>
> Note that if you object, you ar
Torgny Nyblom, 31.12.2010:
> On Thursday 30 December 2010 17.55.35 Milian Wolff wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I want to bring this topic to discussion. As developer of KDevelop and
> > Kate I'm forced to jump through hoops to get code by new contributors
> > in.
> >
> > Right now the workflow is li
Hi,
These are the top mailinglists with the most amount of moderation requests. For
most of them we have tried to contact the current moderators without much
success last year. So now I suggest we get rid of these mailinglists.
Note that if you object, you are volunteering for taking over mode
Andrea Diamantini, 31.12.2010:
> On Thursday 30 December 2010 17:55:35 Milian Wolff wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I want to bring this topic to discussion. As developer of KDevelop and
> > Kate I'm forced to jump through hoops to get code by new contributors
> > in.
> >
> > Right now the workflow i
A Dimarts, 28 de desembre de 2010, Jeremy Whiting va escriure:
> Albert Astals Cid kde.org> writes:
> > > > Anyway it's obvious i'm too late on this, let's just wait for KDE 4.4
> > >
> > > Maybe. I do not think I am in the position to stop you :) I have to
> > > agree with Parker that the curren
Hi,
on Saturday 01 January 2011 17:57:39 Christoph Feck wrote:
> On Monday 27 December 2010 08:45:06 Thomas Baumgart wrote:
> > [libalkimia]
>
> There is a problem in the list of installed files:
> > -- Installing: /local/kde4/lib/libalkimia.so.4.3.0
> > -- Installing: /local/kde4/lib/libalkimia
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6207/
---
(Updated 2011-01-01 14:04:10.460100)
Review request for kde-windows, kdelibs
On Monday 27 December 2010 08:45:06 Thomas Baumgart wrote:
> [libalkimia]
There is a problem in the list of installed files:
> -- Installing: /local/kde4/lib/libalkimia.so.4.3.0
> -- Installing: /local/kde4/lib/libalkimia.so
The file "libalkimia.so.4" is missing.
Christoph Feck (kdepepo)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6218/#review9483
---
Ship it!
OK, thanks
- David
On 2010-12-27 18:27:51, rysin wrot
20 matches
Mail list logo
