On Thursday, 11 de November de 2010 22:22:51 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> which version of gcc is required for building KDE ?
> It seems gcc 4.1 doesn't work, at least currently, see the mail below.
> Qt seems to require gcc 4.2
> (http://doc.qt.nokia.com/4.6/supported-platforms.html)
>
>
Hi,
which version of gcc is required for building KDE ?
It seems gcc 4.1 doesn't work, at least currently, see the mail below.
Qt seems to require gcc 4.2
(http://doc.qt.nokia.com/4.6/supported-platforms.html)
If so, should we add a check whether gcc is at least 4.2 and fail otherwise ?
Alex
O
Friendly Reminder.
technically in effect 11 November 23:59 UTC (but nobody cares if you go over by
a few hours)
Contact the Release Team (release-t...@kde.org) if you need more time (as in a
few days)
On Sunday 07 November 2010 3:29:34 pm Tom Albers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please note that the f
Op den Dunnersdag 11 November 2010 Klock 10:09:24 hett John Layt schreven:
> On Wednesday 10 November 2010 14:46:55 Hans Meine wrote:
> > Op den Dingsdag 09 November 2010 Klock 22:32:52 hett John Layt schreven:
> > > But I can't see any reason why it shouldn't lowercase any given value,
> > > I'll
On Wednesday 10 November 2010 14:46:55 Hans Meine wrote:
> Op den Dingsdag 09 November 2010 Klock 22:32:52 hett John Layt schreven:
> > But I can't see any reason why it shouldn't lowercase any given value,
> > I'll fix that and update the apidox to state it should be lowercase.
>
> Why not give t
Thanks a lot for the detail replay. I am very much agree with your points.
When I did the hacking, I already felt bad to make the ccal/NOVAS codes into
one big stuff.
For licensing issue, at the very beginning, how about separate those
astronomical algorithms for the Chinese calendar into a stand