Re: Removing kbugbuster from kdesdk

On Saturday 06 November 2010 20:28:27 Burkhard Lück wrote: > Am Samstag, 6. November 2010, um 22:57:42 schrieb Raphael Kubo da Costa: > > Hi, > > > > kbugbuster has not seen a bug fix or feature commit in several years, and > > hasn't worked at all for a long time (the URLs it uses for KDE's bugzi

Re: Review Request: Four simple patches for kdecore

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/5775/#review8527 --- /trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kdecore/localization/klocale_kde.cpp

tags/unmaintained/4 trunk/KDE/kdesdk

SVN commit 1193777 by rkcosta: Move kbugbuster from kdesdk to tags/unmaintained/4. It has not seen any bug fix or feature commit for several years and does not work with KDE's bugzilla anymore. Approved by mattr, kdesdk coordinator. CCMAIL: release-t...@kde.org CCMAIL: kde-core-devel@kde.org CC

Re: Review Request: Four simple patches for kdecore

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/5775/ --- (Updated 2010-11-06 22:35:06.086790) Review request for kdelibs. Changes -

Re: Removing kbugbuster from kdesdk

Am Samstag, 6. November 2010, um 22:57:42 schrieb Raphael Kubo da Costa: > Hi, > > kbugbuster has not seen a bug fix or feature commit in several years, and > hasn't worked at all for a long time (the URLs it uses for KDE's bugzilla > do not work, to start with). > > I asked mattr as the kdesdk c

Re: Issues with Solid from trunk and qtcreator 2.0.1...

On Saturday, 6 de November de 2010 13:58:33 Dawit A wrote: > Hmm... if the call times out though, why doesn't it return an error ? > I get back the expected reply for the introspection call instead... Can you check with strace on the system bus when the reply was actually sent? strace -ttt -e sen

Removing kbugbuster from kdesdk

Hi, kbugbuster has not seen a bug fix or feature commit in several years, and hasn't worked at all for a long time (the URLs it uses for KDE's bugzilla do not work, to start with). I asked mattr as the kdesdk coordinator if he was OK with moving kbugbuster to tags/unmaintained/4, and he has ap

Re: Changing my mind: reverting my menubar, toolbars and statusbar changes

On 06/11/2010 16:47, Christoph Feck wrote: >> # The "Fix my mess" plan >> [... long plan involving reverting ...] >> This should reduce the risk of build failures since any application I >> missed which switched to showHide*() methods will continue to build but >> get warnings for one week. Does th

Re: Changing my mind: reverting my menubar, toolbars and statusbar changes

Hi Aurélien, On Saturday 06 November 2010 15:31:45 Aurélien Gâteau wrote: > I have been quite busy trying to convince everyone actions to toggle UI > items such as menubar, toolbars, sidebars or statusbar should be labeled > "Show/hide Foo" depending on the visibility of Foo rather than > implemen

Re: Review Request: Four simple patches for kdecore

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/5775/#review8523 --- /trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kdecore/date/ktimezone.cpp

Changing my mind: reverting my menubar, toolbars and statusbar changes

Hi, I have been quite busy trying to convince everyone actions to toggle UI items such as menubar, toolbars, sidebars or statusbar should be labeled "Show/hide Foo" depending on the visibility of Foo rather than implemented as a checkable "[ ] Show Foo" item. Having started to work on converting

Review Request: Four simple patches for kdecore

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/5775/ --- Review request for kdelibs. Summary --- As I do not know if that kind o

Re: Issues with Solid from trunk and qtcreator 2.0.1...

On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Dawit A wrote: > On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: >> On Friday, 5 de November de 2010 18:54:43 Dawit A wrote: >>> > Can you give me a "thr apply all bt full" of this lockup? >>> >>> I guess I would need to recompile both qt and dbus in debug