https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=170425
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
Status|UNC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364114
--- Comment #5 from Martin Steigerwald ---
https://phabricator.kde.org/T630
is somewhat related.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=371447
Bug ID: 371447
Summary: laptop screen disabled after resume from suspend to
RAM
Product: KScreen
Version: 5.8.2
Platform: Debian unstable
OS: Linux
Sta
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=371447
--- Comment #2 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 101688
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=101688&action=edit
kscreen-doctor -i --json after resume
internal laptop display LVDS-1 (65) is disabled.
However according to kscreen lo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=371447
--- Comment #3 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 101689
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=101689&action=edit
kscreen-console bug directly after resume
Dunno what it wanted to parse from kscreen.log, but I attached this separatel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=371447
--- Comment #1 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 101687
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=101687&action=edit
kscreen.log
It appears to me that for whatever reason kscreen does not activate the second
output:
21.10.2016 17:35:39
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=371447
--- Comment #4 from Martin Steigerwald ---
martin@merkaba:~> kscreen-doctor output.LVDS-1.enable
Enabling output 65
kscreen.doctor: setop exec returned
works, but enabled LVDS in clone mode. So it seems that kscreen completely
forgot that the laptop sc
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=371447
--- Comment #6 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 101691
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=101691&action=edit
kscreen.log after enabling laptop display again
and moving it to the left side (instead of clone mode) as it was before
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=371447
--- Comment #5 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 101690
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=101690&action=edit
kscreen-console bug after enabling laptop display
This is the state I desire after resuming.
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=371447
--- Comment #7 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 101723
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=101723&action=edit
kscreen kcm after resuming
It completely lost state. Laptop display is disabled *and* not on the left of
the external d
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367892
--- Comment #4 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Hello Daniel. I am talking about the visible response in KMail. I did not check
if there is something happening on the IMAP server. For IMAP, in company with
Exchange, but I also tested with Dovecot IMAP on my
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368686
Bug ID: 368686
Summary: frozen session after swiching sessions when using two
sessions
Product: ksmserver
Version: 5.7.3
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Stat
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368686
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340813
--- Comment #11 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Yay! Thank you, Dan! Would you backport this to 16.08 as well?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367708
Bug ID: 367708
Summary: [Exchange 2013] Error on saving sent mail to IMAP
folder: A07 BAD Command Argument Error. 12
Product: Akonadi
Version: 16.04
Platform: Debian unstable
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367708
--- Comment #1 from Martin Steigerwald ---
I intend to try to access Exchange server directly instead of by proxy to
determine whether its a proxy issue.
I also created IMAP log. Here is what I think the relevant excerpt of it:
C: A22 SELECT "INBO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367708
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[Exchange 2013] Error on|[Exchange 2013] Saving sent
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #19 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Gunter, how big is your sent folder? How many mails are in there.
And, I am not sure whether it has been mentioned already, but my better
experience may (!) be related to some manual MySQL tuning. Especially:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #22 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Gunther, I am not sure what is going on on your system, cause when I access a
76000 mails folder it takes about 8 seconds to actually see KMail showing the
first mails and starting the threading operation. Or
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #23 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Hmmm, okay, now I notice there is an important difference. I tested this
against a local maildir resource, not with IMAP. I think… I bet that may cause
a difference in MySQL load. Do you use disconnected IMAP
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #26 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 100800
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=100800&action=edit
excerpt of query log, clicking mails in open folders for some seconds
This is what is almost instant on my machine.
-
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #25 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Okay, I seriously don´t get why its so different for you: One folder with about
1 mails about one second with cold caches and one with more than 24000
mails about 2-3 seconds with cold caches. This time on
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #27 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 100801
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=100801&action=edit
excerpt of query log for folder synchronisation after deleting mails
I sometimes need to delete quite a bunch of mails
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #28 from Martin Steigerwald ---
There seem to be three issues in what you observe:
1) There is folder synchronisation when you enter a folder and click mails in
there to read them. I don´t have that and for me this operation is, except for
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #29 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Okay, nope changing the title on the bug report I mentioned on the third issue
doesn´t make sense. I don´t see this bug anymore since performance improvements
made by Dan and Millian. It makes sense to split o
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334206
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334206
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|REOPENED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334209
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334216
--- Comment #1 from Martin Steigerwald ---
This still happens with KMail/Akonadi 16.04. Its not nearly as annoying as
Akonadi maildir resource is much faster now on synchronisation folders. Its
still synchronizing although it should know which mails mai
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=307064
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |UNMAINTAINED
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=279380
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |UNMAINTAINED
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367892
Bug ID: 367892
Summary: During folder synchronisation Akonadi blocks out other
operations like deleting or viewing mails
Product: Akonadi
Version: 16.04
Platform: Debian unstable
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367892
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #30 from Martin Steigerwald ---
I just created
Bug 367892 - During folder synchronisation Akonadi blocks out other operations
like deleting or viewing mails
for blocking out other operations during folder synchronisation. Gunther, if
you f
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360563
Bug ID: 360563
Summary: black screen on session restore until removing
~/.local/share/kscreen
Product: KScreen
Version: 5.5.4
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360563
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360563
--- Comment #1 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 97913
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=97913&action=edit
broken ~/.local/share/kscreen that led to black display
Fujitsu Siemens Computers GmbH-P24T-7 is home display connected v
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360563
--- Comment #11 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Alexey, I do not understand whether you are really seeing the *same* bug. Do
you have a *black* screen on session *login* with a certain kscreen
configuration?
If yes, thats the same bug.
If not, its likely
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360563
--- Comment #13 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Okay. Thank you for the detailed description. Which ~/.local/share/kscreen in
your archive correspondends to the black screen on login state?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360563
--- Comment #15 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Alexey, okay, got confused by
4. The screen is modified. It copies current displayed image, moves it down
from top of monitor and fixed the image (system is still responsible and all
actoins and movements wil
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360811
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360811
Bug ID: 360811
Summary: markdown preview
Product: kate
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: wishlist
Priority:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=339181
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=339181
--- Comment #13 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Okay, Dan didn´t really confirm the bug, actually there are two bugs: The one
with moving mails from cached IMAP to local folder, the other is generally that
on failures there are items without RID, which are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360834
Bug ID: 360834
Summary: no mechanism to reattempt to store items without rid
(just in db) into the resource
Product: Akonadi
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
O
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=339181
--- Comment #14 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Added a bug report about the no rid, no option to reattempt to push item into
server issue:
Bug 360834 - no mechanism to reattempt to store items without rid (just in db)
into the resource
--
You are recei
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=339181
--- Comment #18 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Wow, thank you, Dan. I may even test if, if I configure my IMAP account again,
I removed it cause Akonadi was too slow, yet, I found it replaced mysql.conf in
a recent upgrade due to a setting deprecated in My
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360811
--- Comment #2 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Gregor, thanks for your input. That is a different, but related feature. I´d
like to see this as well. Please open a new bug about this and post a link
here. Thanks. (One issue / feature in one bug.)
--
You a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360834
--- Comment #1 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Adding link to Dan´s mail in the thread "Akonadictl fsck" on kdepim-users where
he explains this:
https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdepim-users/2016-March/000113.html
Also this report might be a duplicate of bu
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344242
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
--- Comment #7 from Ma
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360834
--- Comment #2 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Oh and Dan later added that "server" actually means any resource, so "server"
could also be a local maildir or calender file or what not.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug chang
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344242
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360834
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||piedro.kul...@googlemail.co
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360834
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360834
--- Comment #6 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Knut, it is safe to remove them (but only the file_lost+found files not
file_db_data!). That Akonadi leaks files in file_db_data which akonadictl fsck
moves to lost+found is a known bug that has been fixed. The
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290393
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
--- Comment #4 from Ma
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364114
Bug ID: 364114
Summary: moving a folder within one maildir resource is
extremely slow and inefficient
Product: Akonadi
Version: 16.04
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=233069
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290393
--- Comment #5 from Martin Steigerwald ---
If Akonadi behaves similarily as I described in
364114 - moving a folder within one maildir resource is extremely slow and
inefficient
with mbox folders, this may explain quite a lot of the slowness you descr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336859
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=297858
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=233069
--- Comment #16 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Sad, but understandable Boudewijn. I had data losses myself, but the last has
been a very long time ago. I think Akonadi got much more stable related to data
safety, but I can understand you.
--
You are rece
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363851
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363851
--- Comment #8 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Entirely your choice and in the end I don´t care, cause I do not intend to use
Neon. Yet, you mask bugs this way.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363851
--- Comment #20 from Martin Steigerwald ---
I think one major issue here is that systemd then doesn´t seem to handle
shutdown different to log out, i.e. I and quite some other users I read from
prefer processes to be kept running on logout, but when I s
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363851
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|mar...@lichtvoll.de |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=354056
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361588
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |FIXED
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361588
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #16 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Tore, two things:
1) AFAIK KMail 15.12 neeeds Akonadi 15.12 or at least any *other* Qt 5 based
Akonadi. Akonadi 1.13 to my knowledge is Qt 4 based. So I wonder why it works
at all on your system. It might be
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #17 from Martin Steigerwald ---
I am running with 16.04 already, but it was already way faster with 15.12.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364114
--- Comment #1 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Today I tried to be clever:
- I just stopped Akonadi and waited till it was gone (including mysqld
process).
- Then I manually moved several large folders with LKML mails, one with 26+
mails within the mai
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364114
--- Comment #2 from Martin Steigerwald ---
And yeah, I bet I know what its doing: Its removing all the stale mails entries
from the mysqld database and then adding them again at the new location. Also
KMail still showed the folders at their old location
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364114
--- Comment #3 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Okay, it took about 10 minutes and several GiB of disk traffic, but it seems it
is now done. Folders at their new location do not yet display amount of unread
mails and I expect Akonadi to create even more I/O
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364114
--- Comment #4 from Martin Steigerwald ---
I see how it is challenging to solve this within current Akonadi design. If
using a folder ID that is just stored within the database, it won´t detect
manual moves. But well, it could write a .folderinfo file i
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316107
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |REOPENED
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361737
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|duplicates values in|slowdown on pop3 download
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=354400
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
--- Comment #43 from M
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311184
--- Comment #8 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Johannes, thank you for the imformation. Please report a new bug tough in order
to have it being free of old and outdated information about an unmaintained
release of KDEPIM.
Also explain exactly what you are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316107
--- Comment #33 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Sudhir, I have no idea what Zoho displays there. I only know zoho.com as a
source for spam that reaches my mailbox so far. I suggest you talk back with
Zoho support on this one. Let us know is KDEPIM/Akonadi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356093
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
Status|UNC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356093
--- Comment #4 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 96160
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=96160&action=edit
kwatchgnupg.log
It basically restarts gnupg again and again and again as it can´t verify the
signature.
Adrian, I do not
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356093
--- Comment #5 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 96161
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=96161&action=edit
example mail from debian-devel-changes-ml I used for creating kwatchgnupg log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356093
--- Comment #9 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 96167
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=96167&action=edit
gpg.conf I used for previous test
may it stumble over keyid-format 0xlong
The config is a recommendation from they examp
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356093
--- Comment #10 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 96168
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=96168&action=edit
dirmngr.conf used for previous test
gnugp is from Debian Sid packages – I don´t know which one KMail is running:
martin
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356093
--- Comment #11 from Martin Steigerwald ---
In a debugging session together with Sandro we found that messageviewer renders
such a mail okay, but kmail does not check that it already verified the mail,
the verification failed and then tries it all again
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336581
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340529
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
--- Comment #1 from Ma
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358021
Bug ID: 358021
Summary: opens a new tab when clicking on a link in other tab
where before it didn´t
Product: akregator
Version: GIT (master)
Platform: Debian testing
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358021
--- Comment #1 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 96652
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=96652&action=edit
akregatorrc that triggers the open in new tab always issue
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358021
--- Comment #2 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 96653
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=96653&action=edit
akregatorrc where clicking in a new link in other tab doesn´t open a new tab
But it then always focuses immediately on th
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358116
Bug ID: 358116
Summary: messageviewer leaks temporary files with mail parts in
it
Product: kmail2
Version: Git (master)
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Statu
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358116
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||skna...@kde.org
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358116
--- Comment #1 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Almost all of the directories still have files in it:
merkaba:/tmp> find -name "*unnamed*" | wc -l
116
However quite some of them are empty:
merkaba:/tmp> find -name "*unnamed*" -empty | wc -l
50
merkaba:/
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358116
--- Comment #3 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Hm, Laurent, I clicked through some more mails and the count of messageviewer
directories in /tmp didn´t increase:
merkaba:/tmp> ls -ld messageviewer_* | wc -l
117
Hmmm, okay, it does when I open a mail with
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358116
--- Comment #5 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Hmmm, I had some crashes when I had KMail running during kdesrc-build. But 117
files – even it at one day I had two copies of KMail run (one for work user,
one for private user)? Well, I am happy to test any fi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316107
--- Comment #30 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Hello Sudhir, read comment #27. I specified what information I ask for there.
Thanks, Martin
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316107
--- Comment #31 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Additionally for "So, can you still reproduce this with KMail from KDEPIM 4.14
and Akonadi 1.13?" I´d update this to KDEPIM + Akonadi 15.12. Please test with
that version as KDEPIM 4 and Akonadi 1.13 are not s
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361737
--- Comment #8 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 98669
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=98669&action=edit
excessive duplicates in akonadi_pop3_resource_0rc
Albert, the duplicates easily get excessive. Here an example of it with
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361737
--- Comment #9 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Hi Laurent, I can´t test it, as I do not have Qt 5.6 on my Debian
Sid/Experimental setup and I gathered that KDEPIM requires it since a week or
so. I do have kdesrc-build and while a recompile of KDEPIM is easy
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
