https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=490520
--- Comment #4 from Vedant Paranjape ---
(In reply to Paul Floyd from comment #3)
> I've been using LLVM compilers for several years without any issues.
>
> Are you seeing configure passing this test:
>
> # does the x86/amd64 assembler understand the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=490520
--- Comment #3 from Paul Floyd ---
I've been using LLVM compilers for several years without any issues.
Are you seeing configure passing this test:
# does the x86/amd64 assembler understand the LOOPNEL instruction?
# Note, this doesn't generate a C-le
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=490520
--- Comment #2 from Vedant Paranjape ---
> Other than AMD not documenting it (and LLVM not accepting the mnemonic) I
> don't see any problem.
It leads to regression in testcases for LLVM based compilers as LLVM doesn't
accept the mnemonic. Do you sugg
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=490520
Paul Floyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=490520
Paul Floyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pjfl...@wanadoo.fr
--- Comment #1 from Paul Floyd
