https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445235
Paul Floyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445235
--- Comment #15 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Paul Floyd from comment #13)
> Created attachment 174732 [details]
> Patch to activate caling the ada demangler
>
> I'm triggering ada demangling based on the presence of
> __gnat_ada_main_program_nam
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445235
--- Comment #14 from Philippe Waroquiers ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #10)
> So one simple question might be whether we actually want to demangle Ada?
> It looks like the mangling is so simple (. -> __, add _ada_ for "top-level"
> functio
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445235
--- Comment #13 from Paul Floyd ---
Created attachment 174732
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=174732&action=edit
Patch to activate caling the ada demangler
I'm triggering ada demangling based on the presence of
__gnat_ada_main_program_name
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445235
--- Comment #12 from Paul Floyd ---
The libiberty code does handle quite a few cases. I have no idea how many will
be reachable from Valgrind errors or even when debugging Valgrind.
If there are any deficiencies in the demangling then I would prefer to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445235
--- Comment #10 from Mark Wielaard ---
So one simple question might be whether we actually want to demangle Ada?
It looks like the mangling is so simple (. -> __, add _ada_ for "top-level"
functions) that people might just be used to the mangled repres
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445235
--- Comment #11 from lagu...@archeia.com ---
Names can get quite long, it would actually shorten them and make them easier
to read, especially if they are Capitalised as they should be.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445235
--- Comment #9 from Paul Floyd ---
I'm not seeing ada_demangle replace double underscores with a dot, even though
the comments say it should. I need to look at it a bit more.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445235
--- Comment #8 from Philippe Waroquiers ---
(In reply to Paul Floyd from comment #7)
> I installed gnat and I get, without any mods
>
> ==48426== 4 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1 of 2
> ==48426==at 0x484D2E4: malloc (vg_repl
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445235
--- Comment #7 from Paul Floyd ---
I installed gnat and I get, without any mods
==48426== 4 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1 of 2
==48426==at 0x484D2E4: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:450)
==48426==by 0x4090A6: __gnat_malloc
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445235
--- Comment #6 from lagu...@archeia.com ---
er...
procedure Leak_New is
type IP is access Integer;
I : IP := new Integer;
begin
for C in 1 .. 10 loop
I := new Integer;
end loop;
end Leak_New;
objdump -t leak_new
--
You are receivi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445235
lagu...@archeia.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lagu...@archeia.com
--- Comment #5 from l
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445235
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445235
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@gentoo.org
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445235
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
mangled*
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445235
--- Comment #1 from Paul Floyd ---
The D demangling should be fixed (see
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464969)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445235
Paul Floyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pjfl...@wanadoo.fr
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445235
Bug 445235 depends on bug 445184, which changed state.
Bug 445184 Summary: Rust v0 symbol demangling is broken
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445184
What|Removed |Added
---
18 matches
Mail list logo
