https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429352
--- Comment #15 from Carl Love ---
FYI, it has been brought to my attention that in the name changing patch I have
a typo Fp128Ternnary not Fp128Ternary. However, the typo is then fixed in the
patch to add new IOps. Looks like I merged the spelling f
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429352
Carl Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429352
Carl Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429352
--- Comment #13 from Carl Love ---
Patches committed
commit 6daaeb0ff45af6b39f14003e392992a5ac7d51c8 (HEAD -> master, origin/master,
origin/HEAD)
Author: Carl Love
Date: Wed Nov 4 12:23:53 2020 -0600
PPC64: 128-bit Binary Integer Operations, pa
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429352
--- Comment #12 from Carl Love ---
Created attachment 136159
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=136159&action=edit
Change names from trinary to ternary in existing code
Per the comment from Julian to use ternary not trinary, this patch was cr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429352
Carl Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #135082|0 |1
is obsolete||
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429352
--- Comment #10 from Julian Seward ---
==
https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=133459
Test cases for new IOps
OK to land
==
https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=135083
Fix pcast for existing code
OK to land
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429352
--- Comment #9 from Carl Love ---
Created attachment 135176
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=135176&action=edit
Add ACC support into routine get_otrack_shadow_offset_wrk()
Looking up the ACC register offset support is missing in
get_otrac
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429352
--- Comment #8 from Carl Love ---
The regression tests with the above reworked functional test and patch to fix
the pcasting for the existing Iops pass with no new errors.
Note, the test valgrind --tool=memcheck --track-origins=yes ./test_isa_3_1_AT
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429352
--- Comment #7 from Carl Love ---
Created attachment 135083
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=135083&action=edit
Fix pcast for existing code
Fix for the pasting of the existing Iops:
Iop_TruncF128toI64S
Iop_TruncF128toI32S
Iop_TruncF128toI6
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429352
Carl Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #133458|0 |1
is obsolete||
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429352
--- Comment #5 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to Carl Love from comment #1)
> Created attachment 133459 [details]
> Test cases for new IOps
>
> The test cases
This seems OK to be. But per comments on
https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=133458,
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429352
--- Comment #4 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to Carl Love from comment #0)
> Created attachment 133458 [details]
> Functional support for ISA 3.1, New Iops
>
> Power PC missing ISA 3.1 support. Additional patches, part 7
It seems to me that the mc
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429352
Carl Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||will_schm...@vnet.ibm.com
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429352
--- Comment #3 from Carl Love ---
Part 8 patches are in bugzilla 429354
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429352
--- Comment #2 from Carl Love ---
This is the 7th bugzilla for the ISA 3.1 Power PC support. The bugzilla for
part 6 is 427404.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429352
--- Comment #1 from Carl Love ---
Created attachment 133459
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=133459&action=edit
Test cases for new IOps
The test cases
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
17 matches
Mail list logo
