[valgrind] [Bug 400793] pthread_rwlock_timedwrlock false positive

2023-03-09 Thread Paul Floyd
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400793 Paul Floyd changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOPENED

[valgrind] [Bug 400793] pthread_rwlock_timedwrlock false positive

2023-03-08 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400793 andrey.andreyevic...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|RESOLVED

[valgrind] [Bug 400793] pthread_rwlock_timedwrlock false positive

2022-12-29 Thread Paul Floyd
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400793 Paul Floyd changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REPORTED

[valgrind] [Bug 400793] pthread_rwlock_timedwrlock false positive

2022-12-29 Thread Paul Floyd
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400793 Paul Floyd changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pjfl...@wanadoo.fr --- Comment #2 from Paul Floyd

[valgrind] [Bug 400793] pthread_rwlock_timedwrlock false positive

2019-03-10 Thread Julian Seward
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400793 --- Comment #1 from Julian Seward --- This happens because Helgrind on Linux doesn't intercept pthread_rwlock_timedwrlock and so it doesn't know that the lock has been taken. The strange thing is, the code to do the intercept actually exists; it just

[valgrind] [Bug 400793] pthread_rwlock_timedwrlock false positive

2019-02-07 Thread Nikita Leontiev
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400793 Nikita Leontiev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nikita.leont...@gmail.com -- You are receivi

[valgrind] [Bug 400793] pthread_rwlock_timedwrlock false positive

2018-11-07 Thread Dmitry Djachenko
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400793 Dmitry Djachenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dim...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this