[valgrind] [Bug 400783] valgrind complains about a leak in its own code

2019-03-10 Thread Julian Seward
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400783 Julian Seward changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |NOT A BUG Status|REPORTED

[valgrind] [Bug 400783] valgrind complains about a leak in its own code

2018-11-07 Thread Tom Hughes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400783 --- Comment #5 from Tom Hughes --- Look there is basically nothing we can do with the information you have provided - the stack trace is incomplete because the symbols appear to have been stripped and you're using an obscure distribution that I doubt a

[valgrind] [Bug 400783] valgrind complains about a leak in its own code

2018-11-07 Thread Andrew Pennebaker
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400783 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pennebaker --- I do not see this behavior with earlier versions of valgrind such as 3.12. It’s worth pointing out that this fallacious free() warning is happening on Void Linux, compared to no fallacious warnings in Debian. -

[valgrind] [Bug 400783] valgrind complains about a leak in its own code

2018-11-07 Thread Tom Hughes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400783 --- Comment #3 from Tom Hughes --- The only reference to valgrind in that stack trace is to our replacement free routine which has detected the problem - the actual problem is in the dynlink.c code about that which has apparently passed an invalid point

[valgrind] [Bug 400783] valgrind complains about a leak in its own code

2018-11-07 Thread Andrew Pennebaker
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400783 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pennebaker --- When I comment out all of my free()'s, valgrind continues to complain "Invalid free()", and also indicates sections in the valgrind code, not my code. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching a

[valgrind] [Bug 400783] valgrind complains about a leak in its own code

2018-11-06 Thread Tom Hughes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400783 Tom Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||t...@compton.nu --- Comment #1 from Tom Hughes --