https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397424
Philippe Waroquiers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|CONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397424
--- Comment #18 from Dimitrije Nikolic ---
(In reply to Philippe Waroquiers from comment #17)
> Commit 0822ebca8f964f1685d667e0c21fea926633bb92 should make the gdbserver
> tests working with glibc 2.27
> (at least it does on Ubuntu 18.04 which has a gli
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397424
--- Comment #17 from Philippe Waroquiers ---
Commit 0822ebca8f964f1685d667e0c21fea926633bb92 should make the gdbserver
tests working with glibc 2.27
(at least it does on Ubuntu 18.04 which has a glibc 2.27)
Please confirm this also works on mips.
Tha
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397424
--- Comment #16 from Philippe Waroquiers ---
(In reply to Dimitrije Nikolic from comment #11)
> I attached differences between output of test on MIPS and X86 architectures.
> (with glibc 2.27)
Can you rather attach the full unfiltered output on MIPS a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397424
--- Comment #15 from Philippe Waroquiers ---
I have looked at the patch v4_part2.
The patch filters more than just the 'use at exit'.
That means that e.g. we do not check anymore (or check less)
the incremental leak values/behaviour.
So, I have pushed
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397424
--- Comment #14 from Philippe Waroquiers ---
Thanks for this work. I will look at all that in the coming days
(probably this week-end).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397424
--- Comment #13 from Dimitrije Nikolic ---
Created attachment 114683
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=114683&action=edit
diff_mips_x86
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397424
Dimitrije Nikolic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #114443|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397424
--- Comment #11 from Dimitrije Nikolic ---
(In reply to Philippe Waroquiers from comment #8)
> (In reply to Dimitrije Nikolic from comment #5)
> Finally replying, after some holidays ;).
>
> > Created attachment 114443 [details]
> > glibc2-27 & gdbserv
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397424
--- Comment #10 from Dimitrije Nikolic ---
Created attachment 114681
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=114681&action=edit
glibc2-27_gdbserver_v4_part2
glibc 2.27 and gdb_server tests
Remove checks for "in use at exit" bytes.
After resolving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397424
--- Comment #9 from Dimitrije Nikolic ---
(In reply to Philippe Waroquiers from comment #8)
> >
> > For mcmain_pic: I removed added exp file, and added filter_mcmain which
> > replace number of bytes and blocks to "xx".
> As I do not believe that we h
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397424
--- Comment #8 from Philippe Waroquiers ---
(In reply to Dimitrije Nikolic from comment #5)
Finally replying, after some holidays ;).
> Created attachment 114443 [details]
> glibc2-27 & gdbserver problem v3
>
> I was trying for a few days to solve thi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397424
--- Comment #7 from Dimitrije Nikolic ---
Philippe,
Do you need any more modifications for this?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397424
--- Comment #6 from Dimitrije Nikolic ---
Philippe,
Can you take a look at this patch?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397424
Dimitrije Nikolic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #114437|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397424
--- Comment #4 from Philippe Waroquiers ---
Sorry, it looks like I was not very clear in my comment :
I see you have kept the 'START_DELETE/END_DELETE' technique,
which you have integrated in filter_gdb.
I was more thinking to 'canonicalise' the select
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397424
Dimitrije Nikolic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #114421|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397424
--- Comment #2 from Philippe Waroquiers ---
filter_gdb already contains some sed expressions to canononicalise
select syscalls e.g.
...
-e 's/in select ()$/in syscall .../'
\
-e 's/in
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397424
Petar Jovanovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||philippe.waroquiers@skynet.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397424
Dimitrije Nikolic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mips3...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving th
20 matches
Mail list logo
