https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
Martin Klapetek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|mklape...@kde.org |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
Wolfgang Bauer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slartibar...@gmail.com
--- Comment #68 from Wo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
Wolfgang Bauer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||herald...@gmail.com
--- Comment #67 from Wolfg
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
Wolfgang Bauer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||willemso...@planet.nl
--- Comment #66 from Wol
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
Colin J Thomson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|colin.thom...@g6avk.co.uk |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
Thomas Lübking changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
--- Comment #64 from Garland_Key ---
(In reply to chepioq from comment #61)
> (In reply to Garland_Key from comment #56)
> If not, how long will it take for this patch to get rolled into an
> > official release?
> >
> > Kernel: 4.3.3-2-ARCH
> > Shell:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
--- Comment #63 from Glenn Holmer ---
Works great on Fedora 23, thanks very much!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
Stefan Schmid changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||schmidi...@gmail.com
--- Comment #62 from Stefa
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
--- Comment #61 from chepioq ---
(In reply to Garland_Key from comment #56)
If not, how long will it take for this patch to get rolled into an
> official release?
>
> Kernel: 4.3.3-2-ARCH
> Shell: /bin/bash
> DE: Plasma 5.5.3-2
That depend to the mai
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
--- Comment #60 from Garland_Key ---
(In reply to jeremy9856 from comment #59)
> In the mean time you can simply install gnome-font-viewer
Thanks - I just installed it. This will at least allow me to view the fonts
correctly. I can use this in conjun
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
--- Comment #59 from jeremy9...@gmail.com ---
In the mean time you can simply install gnome-font-viewer
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
--- Comment #58 from Garland_Key ---
(In reply to Thomas Lübking from comment #57)
> You need to get the sources of plasma-desktop, apply the patch (patch -p1 <
> path/to/patch.diff) and rebuild at least kcms/kfontinst.
>
> If you've no experience with
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
--- Comment #57 from Thomas Lübking ---
You need to get the sources of plasma-desktop, apply the patch (patch -p1 <
path/to/patch.diff) and rebuild at least kcms/kfontinst.
If you've no experience with compilation, you can ask your distro to pre-pick
t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
Garland_Key changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david.garland@gmail.com
--- Comment #56 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
Thomas Lübking changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://git.reviewboard.kde
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
--- Comment #54 from Thomas Lübking ---
(In reply to hamelg from comment #52)
> Testing again the new patch. It's still ok but i am in 24bits. How can i do
> to test 30/32bits depth ?
You can't - that's a server thing.
Seems the image just has a degen
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
--- Comment #53 from ham...@laposte.net ---
Created attachment 96566
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=96566&action=edit
FcEngine patch
I have attached your patch because cut&past kills correct formatting
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
--- Comment #52 from ham...@laposte.net ---
(In reply to Thomas Lübking from comment #51)
> Thanks a lot. Risking to be a complete PITA, mind testing this patch and
> notably watching on whether you're on 32bit depth and whether a format is
> found (and
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
--- Comment #51 from Thomas Lübking ---
Thanks a lot. Risking to be a complete PITA, mind testing this patch and
notably watching on whether you're on 32bit depth and whether a format is found
(and it's the correct one ;-)
diff --git a/kcms/kfontinst/
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
--- Comment #50 from ham...@laposte.net ---
(In reply to Thomas Lübking from comment #49)
> Thanks everyone, but the test I mostly wait for is that on intel/sna (I
> assume the format was hardcoded because it worked on that driver and I don't
> want to b
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
--- Comment #49 from Thomas Lübking ---
Thanks everyone, but the test I mostly wait for is that on intel/sna (I assume
the format was hardcoded because it worked on that driver and I don't want to
break it - it's too common)
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
--- Comment #48 from Mykola Krachkovsky ---
NVidia GeForce GT 240M, proprietary driver 340.96. It looks OK both installed
font list and viewing uninstaled font from file.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
--- Comment #47 from chepioq ---
(In reply to Thomas Lübking from comment #42)
> We need this patch tested on all possible GPUs (notably intel/sna!)
I forgot that.
I test on laptop Toshiba Sattelite L775, nvidia card GeForce GT 525M and nvidia
drivers
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
ham...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ham...@laposte.net
--- Comment #46 from ham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
--- Comment #45 from Cor Blom ---
(In reply to Thomas Lübking from comment #43)
> Resp. this one (the ARGB32 translucency handling is uncritical, it's applied
> to the preconverted image. This should be the single point of failure)
>
> diff --git a/kcm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
--- Comment #44 from chepioq ---
(In reply to Thomas Lübking from comment #43)
> Resp. this one (the ARGB32 translucency handling is uncritical, it's applied
> to the preconverted image. This should be the single point of failure)
>
> diff --git a/kcms
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
--- Comment #43 from Thomas Lübking ---
Resp. this one (the ARGB32 translucency handling is uncritical, it's applied to
the preconverted image. This should be the single point of failure)
diff --git a/kcms/kfontinst/lib/FcEngine.cpp b/kcms/kfontinst/li
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
--- Comment #42 from Thomas Lübking ---
Yes, is. Stunning.
The xft image is RGB32 here, may depend on whether it's set to translucent
(though there ARGB32 instead of pre-multiplied is used)
We need this patch tested on all possible GPUs (notably intel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
--- Comment #41 from Ongun Kanat ---
SNA: https://www.dropbox.com/s/tzrt2qrx547jagu/SNA.png?dl=0
UXA: https://www.dropbox.com/s/wi199ccg7ql7pz4/UXA.png?dl=0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
--- Comment #40 from Thomas Lübking ---
Sure it's this bug?
Can you provide screenshots of UXA and SNA rendered fonts?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
Ongun Kanat changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ongun.ka...@gmail.com
--- Comment #39 from Ongun
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
--- Comment #38 from Thomas Lübking ---
(In reply to Martin Klapetek from comment #33)
> But I'm thinking we could just add brand new font rendering
> widget to the kcm that replaces the old one and leave everything
> else in place (including the bitro
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
David Pyke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|kdeb...@loftwyr.ca |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
--- Comment #37 from Martin Klapetek ---
> If so, i will come forward at the devel mailinglist.
Please do, it would be most welcome (plasma-devel at kde.org)
I think it would be nice to modernize the code quite a bit. With that
in mind, I think that t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
--- Comment #36 from Thomas Sellmaier ---
(In reply to Nikos Platis from comment #34)
> While thinking about correcting this bug, one has to remember comment #18:
> if multiple fonts are selected, they appear fine. So this may be easier to
> solve than
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
--- Comment #35 from Thomas Sellmaier ---
First of all, I apologize for my harsh sounding post yesterday. My goal was not
to offend someone. But my criticism about favour implementation new features
vs. fixing (old) bugs still remains.
After a few hou
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
--- Comment #34 from Nikos Platis ---
(In reply to Martin Klapetek from comment #33)
> But I'm thinking we could just add brand new font rendering
> widget to the kcm that replaces the old one and leave everything
> else in place (including the bitrotte
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
--- Comment #33 from Martin Klapetek ---
No clue about Craig, but he sure is missed.
But I'm thinking we could just add brand new font rendering
widget to the kcm that replaces the old one and leave everything
else in place (including the bitrotted cod
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
--- Comment #32 from Thomas Lübking ---
a) @Martin K., wtf happened to Craig, is he fine? (pm me in doubt)
b) in any case this is apparently unmaintained bitrot - and that's neither an
"excuse" nor a "reason" for the bug - it's an "explanation"
c) it
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
--- Comment #31 from Martin Klapetek ---
> No, thats no reasons, in this context thats just fine excuses!
Right, you do know that KDE is /all/ open source right?
So what's your excuse to NOT join the development?
> This makes me think, that it wouldn
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
--- Comment #30 from Thomas Sellmaier ---
> Here's a couple of reasons for you:
No, thats no reasons, in this context thats just fine excuses!
> * the code is at least 6 years old, with the copyrights going back to early
> 2000s
> * the original aut
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
--- Comment #29 from Martin Klapetek ---
> This is basic functionality for a desktop environment. Why hasn't it been
> fixed?
Here's a couple of reasons for you:
* the code is at least 6 years old, with the copyrights going back to early
2000s
* the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
--- Comment #28 from Glenn Holmer ---
This is basic functionality for a desktop environment. Why hasn't it been
fixed? It makes Plasma look amateurish.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
--- Comment #27 from jeremy9...@gmail.com ---
A reminder.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
--- Comment #26 from jeremy9...@gmail.com ---
Not a very important bug but it need to be fixed.
It has be opened 18 month ago.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
d...@kaosx.us changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@kaosx.us
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
--- Comment #25 from Joe ---
I filled the same issue under https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=355671 . I
am on Arch w/ Testing enabled and KDE-Unstable (so latest 5.5 Beta + 15.12
Beta). Latest binary Nvidia drivers (358.16), with a GTX560ti.
--
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
Joe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jchevar...@gmail.com
--- Comment #24 from Joe ---
*** Bu
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
Yaroslav Sidlovsky changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zawer...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
george changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|stu...@anchev.net |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watc
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336089
Al changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ahw...@verizon.net
--- Comment #23 from Al ---
I am seein
52 matches
Mail list logo
