https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496490
--- Comment #3 from Sune Vuorela ---
(In reply to Sune Vuorela from comment #2)
> From a quick analysis.
>
> Okular does not corrupt the document I analyzed. Poppler just think the
> signature is weird in part of the code. I still need to get a bit clo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496490
--- Comment #2 from Sune Vuorela ---
>From a quick analysis.
Okular does not corrupt the document I analyzed. Poppler just think the
signature is weird in part of the code. I still need to get a bit closer to
why; I'm also a bit perplexed about having
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496490
Sune Vuorela changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@pusling.com
--- Comment #1 from Sune Vuorel
