[lattedock] [Bug 409215] Analog clock widget uses smaller margins than starters

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409215 --- Comment #12 from PK --- the latte-analog-clock widget solves the problem in a 100% effective way. And very elegant too... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[lattedock] [Bug 409215] Analog clock widget uses smaller margins than starters

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409215 --- Comment #11 from Michail Vourlakos --- (In reply to PK from comment #9) > Forgive me if I say something stupid but you could perhaps introduce a value: > ZoomEffectOn=true (or false) > And at the same time the possibility to specify: > ZoomLevel=0 >

[lattedock] [Bug 409215] Analog clock widget uses smaller margins than starters

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409215 --- Comment #10 from Michail Vourlakos --- (In reply to PK from comment #9) > Forgive me if I say something stupid but you could perhaps introduce a value: > ZoomEffectOn=true (or false) > And at the same time the possibility to specify: > ZoomLevel=0 >

[lattedock] [Bug 409215] Analog clock widget uses smaller margins than starters

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409215 --- Comment #9 from PK --- Forgive me if I say something stupid but you could perhaps introduce a value: ZoomEffectOn=true (or false) And at the same time the possibility to specify: ZoomLevel=0 That way one could enable the zoom-effect and set it to "

[lattedock] [Bug 409215] Analog clock widget uses smaller margins than starters

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409215 --- Comment #8 from Michail Vourlakos --- (In reply to PK from comment #7) > I see your point. I added a touch of zoom and it is exactly as I like it > again. Thank you for your answer. on the other hand, I could fork it and provide a Latte version tha

[lattedock] [Bug 409215] Analog clock widget uses smaller margins than starters

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409215 --- Comment #7 from PK --- I see your point. I added a touch of zoom and it is exactly as I like it again. Thank you for your answer. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[lattedock] [Bug 409215] Analog clock widget uses smaller margins than starters

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409215 --- Comment #6 from PK --- I'm sorry, I think you are write, it is a panel. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[lattedock] [Bug 409215] Analog clock widget uses smaller margins than starters

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409215 --- Comment #5 from PK --- Created attachment 121170 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=121170&action=edit configuration as dock I believe that this latte lay-out is a "dock". see attached image -- You are receiving this mail because: You a

[lattedock] [Bug 409215] Analog clock widget uses smaller margins than starters

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409215 --- Comment #4 from Michail Vourlakos --- (In reply to PK from comment #3) > but it used to be ok. Did you see both attached images? The proper Latte behavior in the new one, this is considered upstream. Add a plasma panel and add the analog clock in

[lattedock] [Bug 409215] Analog clock widget uses smaller margins than starters

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409215 --- Comment #3 from PK --- but it used to be ok. Did you see both attached images? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[lattedock] [Bug 409215] Analog clock widget uses smaller margins than starters

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409215 Michail Vourlakos changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[lattedock] [Bug 409215] Analog clock widget uses smaller margins than starters

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409215 --- Comment #1 from PK --- Created attachment 121167 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=121167&action=edit latte-dock june 26th (clock widget too big) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.