[krita] [Bug 409673] For 10.15, we'll have to notarize our builds

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409673 Boudewijn Rempt changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOPENED

[krita] [Bug 409673] For 10.15, we'll have to notarize our builds

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409673 Boudewijn Rempt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||magolorsoul...@gmail.com --- Comment #6 from

[krita] [Bug 409673] For 10.15, we'll have to notarize our builds

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409673 Boudewijn Rempt changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[krita] [Bug 409673] For 10.15, we'll have to notarize our builds

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409673 vanyossi changed: What|Removed |Added Latest Commit||https://invent.kde.org/kde/ |

[krita] [Bug 409673] For 10.15, we'll have to notarize our builds

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409673 --- Comment #3 from vanyossi --- For the Jenkins builds: at least Catalina will allow some steps to allow running the executable. I can add those steps to a section in the manual. The problem will be after Catalina, it seems the idea is to not allow co

[krita] [Bug 409673] For 10.15, we'll have to notarize our builds

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409673 --- Comment #2 from vanyossi --- That's my specialty ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[krita] [Bug 409673] For 10.15, we'll have to notarize our builds

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409673 Boudewijn Rempt changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|krita-bugs-n...@kde.org |ghe...@gmail.com Status|REPORTED