[kdenlive] [Bug 464209] Video monitor timeline scrubber is invisible. (Flatpak)

2023-01-22 Thread David REVOY
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464209 --- Comment #6 from David REVOY --- Additional info: I tried to roll back the Faltpak to a version of November (22.08.3); the problem is also in it. to list previous version available: $ flatpak remote-info --log flathub org.kde.kdenlive to downgrad

[kdenlive] [Bug 464209] Video monitor timeline scrubber is invisible. (Flatpak)

2023-01-22 Thread David REVOY
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464209 --- Comment #5 from David REVOY --- Created attachment 155497 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=155497&action=edit Location of the issue: missing features. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[kdenlive] [Bug 464209] Video monitor timeline scrubber is invisible. (Flatpak)

2023-01-22 Thread David REVOY
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464209 --- Comment #4 from David REVOY --- I can confirm @JulianHeuser, same here: appimage has them visible. I also can't get the usual overlay toolbar on the rendering preview, (it pops while the mouse hovers the video). Unfortunately for me, the appimage

[kdenlive] [Bug 464209] Video monitor timeline scrubber is invisible. (Flatpak)

2023-01-21 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464209 --- Comment #3 from julianheu...@outlook.com --- I should add that this bug does *not* occur with the appimage (22.12.1). I haven't tried the packaged version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[kdenlive] [Bug 464209] Video monitor timeline scrubber is invisible. (Flatpak)

2023-01-21 Thread David REVOY
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464209 David REVOY changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED CC|

[kdenlive] [Bug 464209] Video monitor timeline scrubber is invisible. (Flatpak)

2023-01-18 Thread Ivan Daudt
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464209 Ivan Daudt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ivan.m.da...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Ivan Da