https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468457
--- Comment #14 from pierre-y...@mnet-online.de ---
I just wanted to mention that I tested the editor Visual Studio Code. In that
editor a standing cursor does not exist in all inactive views.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching al
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468457
--- Comment #13 from pierre-y...@mnet-online.de ---
Created attachment 158167
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=158167&action=edit
kate with a highlighted border
In case the option will be programed one day:
I recognized that also the border
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468457
--- Comment #12 from pierre-y...@mnet-online.de ---
>Really? I thought we have a lot more features that don't exist there.
I can imagine that there a lot more features than in Geany, but for me the
decisive element to use Kate are the different views.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468457
--- Comment #11 from Waqar Ahmed ---
View being inactive doesn't only mean that you have focused some other editor
view. It can also mean that you focused a sidebar or terminal or something
else. An invisible cursor in such cases will be massively annoy
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468457
--- Comment #10 from Waqar Ahmed ---
> one example where it makes sense
- Vimode
- When you have selection. Cursor shows the difference between anchor / current
position.
> big advantage of Kate are the different views, what does not exist in Geany
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468457
--- Comment #9 from Christoph Cullmann ---
(In reply to pierre-yves from comment #8)
> >That info is some times useful, if you compare e.g. long lines.
>
> In this case I could easily mark a long line if there is a need to compare
> tong lines.
>
> I
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468457
--- Comment #8 from pierre-y...@mnet-online.de ---
>That info is some times useful, if you compare e.g. long lines.
In this case I could easily mark a long line if there is a need to compare tong
lines.
I recognized that if there is only one view, and
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468457
--- Comment #7 from Christoph Cullmann ---
(In reply to pierre-yves from comment #6)
> >It shows the location of the text cursor.
>
> I know this already. I asked in which kind of condition one need to know the
> location of an inactive view. I still d
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468457
--- Comment #6 from pierre-y...@mnet-online.de ---
>It shows the location of the text cursor.
I know this already. I asked in which kind of condition one need to know the
location of an inactive view. I still don't see any sense and you still didn't
giv
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468457
--- Comment #5 from Christoph Cullmann ---
(In reply to pierre-yves from comment #4)
> > ... and for sure to have some extra option for that seems overkill.
>
> This I understand completely. I don't ask for an option. It could be set by
> default that
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468457
--- Comment #4 from pierre-y...@mnet-online.de ---
> ... and for sure to have some extra option for that seems overkill.
This I understand completely. I don't ask for an option. It could be set by
default that there is no standing cursor.
>... but I se
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468457
Christoph Cullmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cullm...@kde.org
--- Comment #3 from Chris
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468457
--- Comment #2 from pierre-y...@mnet-online.de ---
>Working as expected
Would it be too complicated to disable it by default?
I mean, what is the advantage of a standing cursor?
I don't see any advantages. It just disturbs.
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468457
Waqar Ahmed changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||waqar@gmail.com
Resolution|---
14 matches
Mail list logo
