https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388232
Mauro Carvalho Chehab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388232
--- Comment #12 from Mauro Carvalho Chehab ---
Kaffeine's Docker container is now at:
https://cloud.docker.com/u/maurochehab/repository/docker/maurochehab/kaffeine
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388232
Mauro Carvalho Chehab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388232
Mauro Carvalho Chehab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Latest Commit||https://commits.kde.org/kaf
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388232
--- Comment #9 from Mauro Carvalho Chehab ---
Created attachment 111782
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=111782&action=edit
Add snapcraft support to Kaffeine
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388232
--- Comment #8 from Mauro Carvalho Chehab ---
I played a little with snapcraft during the weekend. Doing a basic build itself
is not that hard. According to snapcraft, all it would be required is to add a
tree at github:
https://github.com/mchehab/k
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388232
--- Comment #7 from Mauro Carvalho Chehab ---
(In reply to James Cain from comment #6)
> Is there any reason not to include version 3 of VLC libs with the snap?
What would be the syntax for doing that? AFAIKT, there's an incompatibility
issue on Ubunt
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388232
--- Comment #6 from James Cain ---
Is there any reason not to include version 3 of VLC libs with the snap? I use
VLC 3 AS a snap, and it's great. Not sure you can make a snap dependent on
another snap, however. One of the main points of snapping apps is
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388232
--- Comment #5 from Mauro Carvalho Chehab ---
As a test, I uploaded a copy of kaffeine's tree to my github account:
https://github.com/mchehab/kaffeine
And added a snap/snapcraft.yaml based on vlc snap one there, letting it build
automatically. Ple
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388232
--- Comment #4 from Mauro Carvalho Chehab ---
(In reply to James Cain from comment #3)
> Not to enlarge this scope too much, but Snap, Flatpak, or AppImage, anything
> would be a better option than what's there now. With Kaffeine being the only
> KF5-co
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388232
James Cain changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dequ...@mykolab.com
--- Comment #3 from James Cain
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388232
--- Comment #2 from Peter Eszlari ---
> If I understand well, you want to generate a package that won't depend on
> libudev, right?
In the case of flatpak, yes. Flatpak runs the app in a sandbox, where it is not
allowed to link against any libraries o
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388232
--- Comment #1 from Mauro Carvalho Chehab ---
(In reply to Peter Eszlari from comment #0)
> https://flatpak.org / https://flathub.org
>
> I wanted to build a flatpak of kaffeine and publish it on flathub. Then I
> noticed that libdvbv5 depends on libud
13 matches
Mail list logo
