https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412909
--- Comment #20 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
thanks for the feedback
gilles caulier
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412909
--- Comment #19 from bog...@hlevca.com ---
I could finally test it. Slideshow works fine, it does not skip pictures
anymore. Thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412909
--- Comment #17 from bog...@hlevca.com ---
Still having issues with the libs dependencies?
I don't see a recent appimage in the https://files.kde.org/digikam/ directory.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412909
--- Comment #18 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
yes APPImage scripts are broken. I'm working on...
Gilles Caulier
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412909
--- Comment #16 from Maik Qualmann ---
The QProgressBar value always remains in the set range of minimum and maximum.
Maik
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412909
--- Comment #15 from bog...@hlevca.com ---
Question:
Should line 344 be
if (d->progressBar->value() >= d->settings.delay)
instead of the existing one
if (d->progressBar->value() == d->settings.delay)
?
What if the polling mechanism goe
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412909
--- Comment #14 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
I currently works to AppImage, to solve some lib problems not relevant of this
entry. I hope to restore AppImage workflow while this week end.
Check file dates later on this repository:
https://files.kd
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412909
--- Comment #13 from bog...@hlevca.com ---
I see that you implemented a polling mechanism. I hope that it works for me
too.
Is there any build I can download and test? I would rather not build the
entire package myself. Perhaps an AppImage?
Thanks
Bog
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412909
Maik Qualmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412909
--- Comment #11 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
Maik,
yes, HEIF take a while to decompress. This is why i implemented the JPEG
preview support in XMP digiKam namespace. Like this HEIF work like TIFF, PNG,
or JPEG2000.
This require my big patch in Exi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412909
Maik Qualmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412909
--- Comment #9 from bog...@hlevca.com ---
I understand that, but nevertheless, those pictures at the indices that are not
loaded are also not displayed. As I said I don't see 30 to 40% of the images.
Perhaps some sort of ensuring that all pictures are lo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412909
--- Comment #8 from Maik Qualmann ---
Between the file indexes is not always a loading process is not an error. The
slideshow does preloading images, so the load process is not synchronous.
Maik
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watchin
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412909
--- Comment #7 from bog...@hlevca.com ---
Looking at the counter it seems that it goes through all of them but some are
not displayed but instead just the number is listed in the bottom left corner
for a fraction of a second.
I believe that the size of
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412909
--- Comment #6 from Maik Qualmann ---
The initial scan of the collection will take you 43 seconds during this time
the database is partially blocked. This has already been improved in the
pre-release version of digiKam 6.4.0. Maybe that's the cause. Are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412909
--- Comment #5 from bog...@hlevca.com ---
Created attachment 123176
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=123176&action=edit
skip slides digikam log
log for digikam while doing a slideshow
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watchin
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412909
--- Comment #4 from bog...@hlevca.com ---
I am not at home now, I will do it in a couple of hours
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412909
caulier.gil...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Preview-Image |Plugin-Generic-SlideShow
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412909
caulier.gil...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||caulier.gil...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412909
bog...@hlevca.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bog...@hlevca.com
--- Comment #2 from bog...
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412909
Maik Qualmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||metzping...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Maik
21 matches
Mail list logo
