https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390700
--- Comment #22 from Maik Qualmann ---
Ok, the RAF files of the new X-T20 e.g. Fuji models (6x6 Mosaic) are still
processed with the wrong colors.
Maik
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390700
--- Comment #21 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
Maik,
I tested the regression with other RAW format as CR2, CR3, NEF, ORF, ARW, etc,
and all work as expected, excepted the margin around the full raw image...
Gilles
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390700
caulier.gil...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Unable to convert Fujifilm |Unable to convert Fujifilm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390700
--- Comment #20 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 138919
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=138919&action=edit
Patch to use libraw full size data extraction to process DNG
Maik,
See my patch against git /master. I created a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390700
--- Comment #19 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
Git commit 5e9e6682b3eda8e0e226eddd1c2f4b2c2c24f561 by Gilles Caulier.
Committed on 21/05/2021 at 18:44.
Pushed by cgilles into branch 'master'.
More debug statement to hack RAF to DNG conversion.
Relate
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390700
--- Comment #18 from Maik Qualmann ---
Git commit e4dee8b223a2ce81e8d70af37472dcc83f4e4c11 by Maik Qualmann.
Committed on 11/05/2021 at 20:37.
Pushed by mqualmann into branch 'master'.
add Fuji X-Trans sensor identify
Colors not yet correct.
M +17
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390700
--- Comment #17 from Maik Qualmann ---
The 45 degree rotation is a Fuji specialty from SuperCCD, the image is recorded
that way with older cameras.
Maik
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390700
--- Comment #16 from Maik Qualmann ---
Hi Gilles,
Your test sample is from a Fuji S3Pro. But the Mosaic6x6 should be for the
newer X-Trans sensors from Fuji, all cameras with an X in their name as X-T20
e.g.
With a test sample of the X-T20, I still ha
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390700
--- Comment #15 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
Maik,
I apply the DNG sdk function fro Fuji,:
https://invent.kde.org/graphics/digikam/commit/b85d3cf47af7acb967a8d16046681139bd0cf147
But this no give a difference...
Gilles
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390700
--- Comment #14 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
Git commit 6b1fa1fbf30867b8bc76209245923f939efe826a by Gilles Caulier.
Committed on 11/05/2021 at 12:47.
Pushed by cgilles into branch 'master'.
report DNG SDK error codes as string
Related: bug 418941
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390700
--- Comment #13 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
Maik, the first problem was the camera maker string was not checked as
upper-case. So now we have this kind of output:
[gilles@localhost dngwriter]$ ./raw2dng RAW_FUJI_S3PRO.RAF
digikam.general: DNGWrit
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390700
--- Comment #12 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
Git commit 97e800c4c6831717f78437638cf5d3dd870bc316 by Gilles Caulier.
Committed on 11/05/2021 at 12:22.
Pushed by cgilles into branch 'master'.
camera maker string must be checked as upper-case.
Related
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390700
--- Comment #11 from Maik Qualmann ---
The dng-sdk has a new function for this Fuji sensor
SetFujiMosaic6x6() not previously used.
Maik
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390700
caulier.gil...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Unable to convert Fujifilm |Unable to convert Fujifilm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390700
--- Comment #10 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
Maik,
The RAF bayer mosaic problem still reproducible with DNG SDK 1.5 update and
libraw snapshot 20210504.
I tried with this RAF Fuji S3 sample :
http://www.rawsamples.ch/raws/fuji/s3pro/RAW_FUJI_S3PR
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390700
caulier.gil...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Unable to convert Fujifilm |Unable to convert Fujifilm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390700
--- Comment #9 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
digiKam 7.0.0 stable release is now published:
https://www.digikam.org/news/2020-07-19-7.0.0_release_announcement/
We need a fresh feedback on this file using this version.
Best Regards
Gilles Caulier
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390700
Maik Qualmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sse...@gmail.com
--- Comment #8 from Maik Qualm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390700
--- Comment #7 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
digiKam 7.0.0-beta1 is out :
https://download.kde.org/unstable/digikam/
This problem still reproducible with this version which include Libraw engine
version 0.20.0 ?
Thanks in advance and merry Christm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390700
--- Comment #6 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
Exiv2 shared library, to handle metadata. The default codec provided by the
library must be able to get Exif, but for makernotes, it's very specific.
http://www.exiv2.org/
Gilles Caulier
--
You are rec
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390700
--- Comment #5 from mda.adv...@dawid-info.de ---
I know it's off topic, but i would like to ask it:
Are there any other spots in digikam, that would require a hands-on, when
talking about the integration of a new camera model?
Thanks
--
You are recei
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390700
--- Comment #4 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
It's probably a libraw issue as the camera is not on the list. For each RAW
camera, libraw as a corresponding matrix to process bayer sensor, reverse
engineered if i remember some talk with libraw team in
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390700
Maik Qualmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||metzping...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from Maik
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390700
caulier.gil...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||caulier.gil...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390700
--- Comment #1 from mda.adv...@dawid-info.de ---
link to my google drive containing sample images
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1wEoofsT72YlID3jflhw69LyKvM3FOBTX?usp=sharing
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug ch
25 matches
Mail list logo
