[Qt/KDE Flatpak Runtime] [Bug 406449] Apply Krita's Qt patches

2020-10-13 Thread Peter Eszlari
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406449 Peter Eszlari changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Qt/KDE Flatpak Runtime] [Bug 406449] Apply Krita's Qt patches

2019-04-13 Thread Nate Graham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406449 --- Comment #4 from Nate Graham --- Looks like the first one has been merged and the other two are coming along. So I guess it's just a matter of getting all the rest in, then. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[Qt/KDE Flatpak Runtime] [Bug 406449] Apply Krita's Qt patches

2019-04-12 Thread Peter Eszlari
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406449 --- Comment #3 from Peter Eszlari --- Looking at https://cgit.kde.org/krita.git/tree/3rdparty/ext_qt/CMakeLists.txt - the following patches apply to Linux: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/255382/ https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/255383/ ht

[Qt/KDE Flatpak Runtime] [Bug 406449] Apply Krita's Qt patches

2019-04-12 Thread Nate Graham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406449 Nate Graham changed: What|Removed |Added CC||n...@kde.org --- Comment #2 from Nate Graham ---

[Qt/KDE Flatpak Runtime] [Bug 406449] Apply Krita's Qt patches

2019-04-11 Thread Aleix Pol
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406449 --- Comment #1 from Aleix Pol --- Please no, let's not fork Qt. Let's include the patches that are included upstream, we can stretch back-porting them if they are important but just applying random patches is unsustainable. -- You are receiving this