https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436290
--- Comment #5 from dauntless
<60f31543-f82f-492a-8430-25db55215...@dauntless.anonaddy.com> ---
Yeah my large vault works great with gocryptfs, no complaints so far. After
researching the different encryption backends some more I'd be in favour of
makin
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436290
--- Comment #4 from Ivan Čukić ---
Please report back if gocryptfs is up to the task. I liked the way cryfs is
developed, and how open the author is to requests, but this would be a second
big plus for making gocryptfs the default in Vault.
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436290
--- Comment #3 from dauntless
<60f31543-f82f-492a-8430-25db55215...@dauntless.anonaddy.com> ---
Ah I wasn't aware it used such small fixed-size chunking, that would explain
the performance. I'll try gocryptfs instead then, thanks for the help.
--
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436290
Ivan Čukić changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436290
dauntless <60f31543-f82f-492a-8430-25db55215...@dauntless.anonaddy.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436290
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@kde.org
--
You are receiving this mail beca
