[Discover] [Bug 495687] Add the full Flatpak name to the app page

2024-11-04 Thread Nate Graham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=495687 Nate Graham changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |INTENTIONAL Status|NEEDSINFO

[Discover] [Bug 495687] Add the full Flatpak name to the app page

2024-11-01 Thread Matt
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=495687 --- Comment #4 from Matt --- (In reply to Nate Graham from comment #3) > Thanks. But in that, case wouldn't it make more sense to look up the ID > using `flatpak list`? Typically at the moment you want to do `flatpak run > [something]` you've already in

[Discover] [Bug 495687] Add the full Flatpak name to the app page

2024-11-01 Thread Nate Graham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=495687 --- Comment #3 from Nate Graham --- Thanks. But in that, case wouldn't it make more sense to look up the ID using `flatpak list`? Typically at the moment you want to do `flatpak run [something]` you've already in a terminal window anyway, but you don't

[Discover] [Bug 495687] Add the full Flatpak name to the app page

2024-11-01 Thread Matt
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=495687 --- Comment #2 from Matt --- (In reply to Nate Graham from comment #1) > What would be the user-facing advantage of showing this information? Who > benefits, and how? We need a plausible and reasonable use case to be > articulated before we could consid

[Discover] [Bug 495687] Add the full Flatpak name to the app page

2024-11-01 Thread Nate Graham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=495687 Nate Graham changed: What|Removed |Added CC||n...@kde.org Resolution|---