https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467650
--- Comment #5 from David ---
> All Flatpak have a private storage space in `.var/app/appid.foo.bar`. Most
> applications don't need full storage access.
Sure, matter is if they are aware of that, and try not to write/read anywhere
else, which they typ
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467650
--- Comment #4 from Timothée Ravier ---
(In reply to David from comment #2)
> (In reply to Aleix Pol from comment #1)
> > I'm not sure how a user would detect that an app is going to need more
> > permissions.
> Simply by looking at such an hypothetical
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467650
--- Comment #3 from David ---
In general my view goes along with KDE's AFAIU, when flatpak permissions have
been integrated inside system settings. I really do think flatpaks and apps in
general need to be taken care of as much as possible by KDE from t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467650
--- Comment #2 from David ---
(In reply to Aleix Pol from comment #1)
> I'm not sure how a user would detect that an app is going to need more
> permissions.
Simply by looking at such an hypothetical permissions summary popup, I would be
able to infer t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467650
--- Comment #1 from Aleix Pol ---
I'm not sure how a user would detect that an app is going to need more
permissions.
We do show some of them, maybe we need to show more, what are you missing
exactly?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are w
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467650
David changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Introduce permission|Introduce permissions
|summary before
