https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376712
--- Comment #4 from Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net)
<0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Sebastian Kügler from comment #3)
> I wrote the code, so yes.
Just because some decades ago somebody temporarily solved a problem at hand b
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376814
Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net) <0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376814
Bug ID: 376814
Summary: Application launcher ⟶ History: "Forget All" sometimes
doesn't clear the list
Product: plasmashell
Version: 5.9.2
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341141
Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net) <0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376714
--- Comment #6 from Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net)
<0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Sebastian Kügler from comment #5)
> If these two differ in what they're displaying, you have something wrongly
> configured.
Basica
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376714
--- Comment #4 from Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net)
<0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Sebastian Kügler from comment #2)
> Do applications sarted from kickoff respect the settings?
Which settings do you mean exactly? Those re
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376714
--- Comment #3 from Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net)
<0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Sebastian Kügler from comment #2)
> Do applications started from kickoff respect the settings?
No.
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376712
Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net) <0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|I
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376714
Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net) <0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376714
Bug ID: 376714
Summary: kcmshell5 formats ignores ~/.config/plasma-localerc
Product: systemsettings
Version: 5.9.2
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345378
--- Comment #50 from Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net)
<0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Eike Hein from comment #49)
> The clock applet has this option now, why is there still discussion about
> this?
It is probable that the disc
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376712
Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net) <0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Formats module as
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376712
Bug ID: 376712
Summary: Formats module asks the user to relogin after pressing
the Apply button
Product: systemsettings
Version: 5.9.2
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344588
Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net) <0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=354269
Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net) <0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345378
--- Comment #48 from Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net)
<0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Martin Klapetek from comment #46)
> > I don't understand what is so complicated about it.
>
> Exactly.
It is possible you migh
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345378
--- Comment #47 from Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net)
<0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net) from comment #45)
> Valgelis, the man and his music (1984)
Correction: Vangelis, of course.
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345378
--- Comment #45 from Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net)
<0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Martin Klapetek from comment #44)
> Sure, now how would you make every single Qt app
> out there know which &format to pass there so
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345378
--- Comment #43 from Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net)
<0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Martin Klapetek from comment #42)
> I suggest you submit your patch to Qt then and let the
> actual Qt developers comment on that.
There a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345378
--- Comment #41 from Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net)
<0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Martin Klapetek from comment #40)
> (In reply to Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net) from comment #38)
> > (In reply to Martin Klapetek
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345378
--- Comment #39 from Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net)
<0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net) from comment #38)
> https://www.google.sk/search?q=kde+4+date+time+format
Images from the past:
https://www.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345378
Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net) <0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376612
--- Comment #2 from Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net)
<0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> ---
Created attachment 104093
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=104093&action=edit
screenshot - Build Sequence hidden
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376612
Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net) <0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376612
Bug ID: 376612
Summary: There's no context-menu-driven way to unhide a hidden
"Build Sequence" panel
Product: kdevelop
Version: 5.0.80
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376432
--- Comment #8 from Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net)
<0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Kevin Funk from comment #6)
> Done. Unfortunately that won't really affect the probability this is getting
> fixed.
>
> Stepp
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376432
--- Comment #7 from Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net)
<0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Kevin Funk from comment #6)
> Done. Unfortunately that won't really affect the probability this is getting
> fixed.
>
> Stepp
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376060
--- Comment #3 from Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net)
<0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Kevin Funk from comment #2)
> Confirmed. But that's not a KDevelop feature, but one from KTextEditor.
>
> Moving the ticket to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376432
--- Comment #5 from Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net)
<0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Kevin Funk from comment #4)
> Thanks for the report, but I think bug 226117 contains all necessary
> information already. Thanks for the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376432
--- Comment #3 from Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net)
<0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> ---
I suggest to completely delete class FileModificationTimeWrapper.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376432
--- Comment #2 from Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net)
<0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> ---
Created attachment 104012
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=104012&action=edit
gdb backtrace
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376432
Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net) <0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|g
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376432
Bug ID: 376432
Summary: kdevelop is calling utimes() on a C/C++ file
Product: kdevelop
Version: 5.0.80
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: cr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=226117
Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net) <0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376060
Bug ID: 376060
Summary: Print dialog does not respect footer font
Product: kdevelop
Version: 5.0.3
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376060
Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net) <0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
36 matches
Mail list logo
