https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430321
Yi Fan Yu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yifan...@windriver.com
--- Comment #1 from Yi Fan
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435160
--- Comment #13 from Yi Fan Yu ---
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=valgrind.git;a=commit;h=4c8c4a9c3a92300e3e6500e5a278ca37514a1fdb
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435160
Yi Fan Yu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435160
--- Comment #10 from Yi Fan Yu ---
Created attachment 137357
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=137357&action=edit
proposed patch v2
basically to avoid printing the stacktrace with a handled signal.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435160
--- Comment #9 from Yi Fan Yu ---
stderr.exp that would pass the test.
```
Process terminating with default action of signal 14 (SIGALRM)
at 0x: clock_nanosleep@@GLIBC_2.17 (clock_nanosleep.c:?)
by 0x: nanosleep (nanosleep.c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435160
--- Comment #7 from Yi Fan Yu ---
maybe the root cause is just the stderr.exp being to sensitive...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435160
--- Comment #6 from Yi Fan Yu ---
(In reply to Bart Van Assche from comment #5)
> Reverting commit 719d23b7a9c3 ("drd/tests/swapcontext: Improve portability")
> is not an option. Valgrind source code must build and run on all suppo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435160
--- Comment #4 from Yi Fan Yu ---
I do know that the commit I reverted mentioned portability.
Do you know which platform has problems with timerfd?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435160
--- Comment #3 from Yi Fan Yu ---
Created attachment 137186
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=137186&action=edit
proposed patch
revert commit 719d23b7a9c3b02411dee7d5d4d3744938bb768c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435160
--- Comment #2 from Yi Fan Yu ---
What is the purpose of nanosleep, can it be safely removed?
Is there a filter to allow both scenario (stopped in f and stopped in
nanosleep) to be correct?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=434775
Yi Fan Yu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435160
--- Comment #1 from Yi Fan Yu ---
If i remove the nanosleep statement, inside of `f`
the original bug report 432381 's error message appears
drd: drd_main.c:378 (drd_stop_using_mem): Assertion 'a1 <= a2' failed
--
You are r
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435160
Bug ID: 435160
Summary: drd/tests/swapcontext.c: threads are interrupted in
nanosleep
Product: valgrind
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=434775
--- Comment #3 from Yi Fan Yu ---
I tried applying that patch to oe-core build and it still fails with this:
So musl does provide as a header, but you cannot link to any of
the *context calls. The error is a linker failure.
```
/ala-lpggp31/yyu1/oe
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400162
Yi Fan Yu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400162
Yi Fan Yu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #115830|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=434775
--- Comment #1 from Yi Fan Yu ---
Created attachment 136947
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=136947&action=edit
proposed patch (yocto/oe-core fix)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=434775
Bug ID: 434775
Summary: drd/tests/swapcontext.c doesn't build with musl
Product: valgrind
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
Severit
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432870
--- Comment #10 from Yi Fan Yu ---
tested on qemuarm64 and qemux86-64 with glibc2.33
thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432870
--- Comment #4 from Yi Fan Yu ---
here are my findings i summarized to the yocto bugboard.
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14223
## what changed in this patch to cause it to fail?
timeout argument the user passes no longer makes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432870
--- Comment #3 from Yi Fan Yu ---
Here is a working call to sleepers *without* the select update patch in 2.33
it used to directly passes timeout to the underlying syscall.
With 2.33, it doesn't anymore
```
root@qemux86-64:/usr/lib/valgrind/
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432870
--- Comment #1 from Yi Fan Yu ---
this commit for glibc (present in 2.33 but not 2.32) is causing this test to
fail
when i rebuilt glibc with a patch to revert this commit, the test passes.
```
commit 2433d39b69743f100f972e7886f91a2e21795ef0
Author
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432870
Bug ID: 432870
Summary: gdbserver_tests:nlcontrolc hangs with newest glibc2.33
x86-64
Product: valgrind
Version: unspecified
Platform: Archlinux Packages
OS: Linux
23 matches
Mail list logo