https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388786
--- Comment #8 from Quentin Monnet ---
Awesome, thank you Tom! I'm reading your patch carefully, it is nice to see
what I missed. I will follow up these patches if the bpf() syscall changes
again.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388786
Quentin Monnet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #112115|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388786
Quentin Monnet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #112114|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388786
Quentin Monnet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #112113|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388786
Quentin Monnet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #112115|Subject: [PATCH valgrind|[PATCH valgrind 3/3] Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388786
--- Comment #3 from Quentin Monnet ---
Created attachment 112115
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=112115&action=edit
Subject: [PATCH valgrind 3/3] Linux: Add file descriptors tracking in wrappers
for bpf() system call.
--
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388786
--- Comment #2 from Quentin Monnet ---
Created attachment 112114
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=112114&action=edit
[PATCH valgrind 2/3] Linux: amd64: Add support for bpf() syscall.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388786
Quentin Monnet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||quentin.monnet+kde@netronom
