[digikam] [Bug 496619] Fedora 41 appimage: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/libgnutls.so.30

2024-11-27 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496619 --- Comment #6 from Nicofo --- It's working now with last version of Appimage (from thsi morning). Thanks a lot for you work ! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 496619] Fedora 41 appimage: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/libgnutls.so.30

2024-11-26 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496619 --- Comment #4 from Nicofo --- Hello Maik, I tried with last version of appimage. It still does not work. Reason is that the $OS_VERSION is empty instead of being "41" in my case. Line 59 of AppRun is: OS_VERSION=$(awk -F'"

[digikam] [Bug 496711] New: Link to documentation in People View broken

2024-11-26 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496711 Bug ID: 496711 Summary: Link to documentation in People View broken Classification: Applications Product: digikam Version: 8.6.0 Platform: Other OS: Linux Status: REPO

[digikam] [Bug 496619] New: Fedora 41 appimage: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/libgnutls.so.30: undefined symbol: nettle_rsa_oaep_sha384_decrypt, version HOGWEED_6

2024-11-23 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496619 Bug ID: 496619 Summary: Fedora 41 appimage: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/libgnutls.so.30: undefined symbol: nettle_rsa_oaep_sha384_decrypt, version HOGWEED_6 Classification: Applicatio

[digikam] [Bug 496436] Improvement in Miscellaneous settings

2024-11-19 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496436 --- Comment #7 from Nicofo --- ok I understand. Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 496436] Improvement in Miscellaneous settings

2024-11-19 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496436 --- Comment #4 from Nicofo --- Created attachment 175957 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=175957&action=edit Proposal of new dialog ("Download Required Files" becomes "Image detection features" OK, I have seen th

[digikam] [Bug 496436] New: Improvement in Miscellaneous settings

2024-11-18 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496436 Bug ID: 496436 Summary: Improvement in Miscellaneous settings Classification: Applications Product: digikam Version: 8.5.0 Platform: Appimage OS: Linux Status: REPORTE

[digikam] [Bug 468775] Import files - Preview not available

2024-11-10 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468775 --- Comment #19 from Nicofo --- (In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #18) > I need the debug output from you when digiKam loads the thumbnails and > fails. I need to know if there is also an error message or if the thumbnail > is just e

[digikam] [Bug 468775] Import files - Preview not available

2024-11-10 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468775 --- Comment #17 from Nicofo --- Oh indeed, you are right (of course ;) ) there are no thumbnail in the picture (I was not aware of that). I checked also with exiv2. > we would have to request the complete image, but this would be very slo

[digikam] [Bug 468775] Import files - Preview not available

2024-11-09 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468775 --- Comment #15 from Nicofo --- Created attachment 175688 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=175688&action=edit Failes thumbnails in import window More information about the missing thumbnails of some pictures of my phone:

[digikam] [Bug 494308] After deleting a picture (in full screen mode), wrong picture is displayed

2024-10-08 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=494308 --- Comment #2 from Nicofo --- Created attachment 174544 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=174544&action=edit Screencast of the problem. Picture "3" is deleted (clicking on the trash button in the bottom left of the

[digikam] [Bug 494308] New: After deleting a picture (in full screen mode), wrong picture is displayed

2024-10-08 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=494308 Bug ID: 494308 Summary: After deleting a picture (in full screen mode), wrong picture is displayed Classification: Applications Product: digikam Version: 8.5.0 Platform: Appim

[digikam] [Bug 493786] After visiting trash, the display mode switches to Map

2024-09-28 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493786 --- Comment #1 from Nicofo --- Note that this is not always reproducible. I can't figure out how to reproduce it every time. First time it happened while the trash was empty. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 493786] After visiting trash, the display mode switches to Map

2024-09-28 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493786 Nicofo changed: What|Removed |Added Platform|Other |Appimage -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[digikam] [Bug 493786] New: After visiting trash, the display mode switches to Map

2024-09-28 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493786 Bug ID: 493786 Summary: After visiting trash, the display mode switches to Map Classification: Applications Product: digikam Version: 8.5.0 Platform: Other OS: Linux S

[digikam] [Bug 468775] Import files - Preview not available

2024-05-16 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468775 --- Comment #14 from Nicofo --- (In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #13) > The thumbnail from a GPhoto2 device is rendered/created by the phone/camera. > So if the phone/camera doesn't create a thumbnail (for some reason) for a > cert

[digikam] [Bug 468775] Import files - Preview not available

2024-05-16 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468775 --- Comment #12 from Nicofo --- (In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #11) > The cause is probably not the image itself. GPhoto2 has a problem with your > camera device/connection. Which camera model is it? This is an android phone (Motorola)

[digikam] [Bug 468775] Import files - Preview not available

2024-05-14 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468775 --- Comment #10 from Nicofo --- Sorry, I forgot to enable debugging. Here are the outputs in the Import window: Digikam::GPCamera::getThumbnail: Failed to get camera item! "/store_00010001/DCIM/Camera" "IMG_20240510_101546784_H

[digikam] [Bug 468775] Import files - Preview not available

2024-05-14 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468775 --- Comment #9 from Nicofo --- I tried with debug version (digiKam-8.4.0-20240512T090210-Qt6-x86-64-debug.appimage) I only have the following message when I click in "Import": Digikam::ExifToolParser::load: Cannot open source file to pr

[digikam] [Bug 468775] Import files - Preview not available

2024-04-28 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468775 --- Comment #8 from Nicofo --- (In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #7) > There should be something in the debug output in the terminal if thumbnails > are not created for some images. A log would be interesting. Here is the output of digika

[digikam] [Bug 413196] Cannot export files with more as 4 MB to OneDrive

2024-04-22 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413196 --- Comment #12 from Nicofo --- (In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #11) > No, according to Microsoft API documentation it is still limited to 4MB in > simple item upload mode. > > Maik I believe you, but try by yourself, this

[digikam] [Bug 468775] Import files - Preview not available

2024-04-22 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468775 --- Comment #6 from Nicofo --- (In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #5) > No preview image, image broken? No: the image is not broken. And when downloaded, they are displayed correctly in digikam. > In order to get a correct creation date

[digikam] [Bug 413196] Cannot export files with more as 4 MB to OneDrive

2024-04-22 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413196 --- Comment #10 from Nicofo --- As stated in #comment 7: > I am even able to export a video of 98.4 Mb. > (...) > So the limit is somewhere between 98.4 and 168.5 Mb (100Mb maybe ? Possible > to check that on Microsoft documentation ?)&q

[digikam] [Bug 468775] Import files - Preview not available

2024-04-22 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468775 --- Comment #4 from Nicofo --- Created attachment 168812 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=168812&action=edit Missing preview of some pictures + wrong label "created" Hi Gilles, I tested with digiKam-8.4.0-20240421T

[digikam] [Bug 329390] Auto-rotate Using Exif information: rotates wrong picture

2023-10-24 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=329390 --- Comment #7 from Nicofo --- No such problem since a long time. Note: probably because bug 329976 does not affect the orientation anymore since a long time (because orientation is reread from the metadata of the file after a renaming - if option

[digikam] [Bug 329976] SCAN : digiKam does not update database after picture renaming

2023-10-21 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=329976 --- Comment #26 from Nicofo --- Hello Gilles, yes, problem still reproducible. My settings: - Settings > Metadata > "Rescan file when files are modifies" is checked - Settings > Metadata > (Write to metadata) Captions and ti

[digikam] [Bug 433219] Can't sign into my Microsoft account in order to access OneDrive

2023-10-21 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433219 --- Comment #8 from Nicofo --- (In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #7) > @Gilbert, > > What's about this file using current 8.2.0 AppImage Linux bundle ? It's > reproducible ? > > https://files.kde.org/digikam/ >

[digikam] [Bug 413196] Cannot export files with more as 4 MB to OneDrive

2023-05-06 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413196 --- Comment #7 from Nicofo --- (In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #6) > We can also add a check about file size before uploading, and refuse to > process file upper to 4Mb by reporting a warning in dialog files list view. > > Gille

[digikam] [Bug 329976] SCAN : digiKam does not update database after picture renaming

2023-04-21 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=329976 --- Comment #24 from Nicofo --- (In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #23) > Of course, a re-scan assumes that the information is also available in the > image metadata. I can't reproduce the issue when the color or rating label > metad

[digikam] [Bug 468775] New: Import files - Preview not available

2023-04-21 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468775 Bug ID: 468775 Summary: Import files - Preview not available Classification: Applications Product: digikam Version: 8.0.0 Platform: Appimage OS: Linux Status: REPORTED

[digikam] [Bug 329976] SCAN : digiKam does not update database after picture renaming

2023-04-21 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=329976 --- Comment #22 from Nicofo --- (In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #18) > If the file is just > renamed and have been registered previously in the database, the algorithm > will re-detect the previous file as well. It's not a new o

[digikam] [Bug 468626] Error in the description of the Rename options

2023-04-17 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468626 --- Comment #3 from Nicofo --- Ah, OK, sorry for my misunderstanding. But it was not so easy to understand I believe --> thank you for the added clarifications. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 468626] Error in the description of the Rename options

2023-04-17 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468626 Nicofo changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |8.0.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[digikam] [Bug 468626] New: Error in the description of the Rename options

2023-04-17 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468626 Bug ID: 468626 Summary: Error in the description of the Rename options Classification: Applications Product: digikam Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS: Linux Sta

[digikam] [Bug 456512] No sound on AppImage previews

2023-04-15 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=456512 --- Comment #24 from Nicofo --- (In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #23) > I have exactly the same problem here under Kubuntu 22.04 (Plasma desktop). > > Disabling the desktop OpenGL effects fix the problem. Do ask me why... > > G

[digikam] [Bug 456512] No sound on AppImage previews

2023-04-15 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=456512 Nicofo changed: What|Removed |Added Version|7.9.0 |8.0.0 --- Comment #22 from Nicofo --- I have tested

[digikam] [Bug 456512] No sound on AppImage previews

2022-12-11 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=456512 Nicofo changed: What|Removed |Added Version|7.8.0 |7.9.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[digikam] [Bug 455922] Appimage fails to start in Fedora 36 - Missing libnsl.so.1

2022-11-20 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455922 Nicofo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nic...@tuxfamily.org --- Comment #5 from Nicofo

[digikam] [Bug 461495] 'Help' window does not work

2022-11-08 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461495 --- Comment #5 from Nicofo --- Note: I have a "libpcre.so.3" file coming from Steam runtime. I have tried to preload it with for the sake of the test: LD_PRELOAD=/home//.local/share/Steam/ubuntu12_32/steam-runtime/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/li

[digikam] [Bug 461495] 'Help' window does not work

2022-11-08 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461495 --- Comment #4 from Nicofo --- I tried with digiKam-7.9.0-20221108T161738-x86-64.appimage Unfortunately it does not work under Fedora: digikam: error while loading shared libraries: libpcre.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or

[digikam] [Bug 461469] Import file filter not working

2022-11-06 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461469 Nicofo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||461495 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.kde.org

[digikam] [Bug 461495] New: 'Help' window does not work

2022-11-06 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461495 Bug ID: 461495 Summary: 'Help' window does not work Classification: Applications Product: digikam Version: 7.9.0 Platform: Appimage OS: Linux Status: REPORTED

[digikam] [Bug 461469] Import file filter not working

2022-11-06 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461469 --- Comment #4 from Nicofo --- (In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #3) > Note: the name filter accepts wildcards (*). > > Maik Perfect, thank you Maik. If I have well seen, it is possible to add several ignored names separated by a spa

[digikam] [Bug 461469] New: Import file filter not working

2022-11-05 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461469 Bug ID: 461469 Summary: Import file filter not working Classification: Applications Product: digikam Version: 7.9.0 Platform: Appimage OS: Linux Status: REPORTED

[digikam] [Bug 456512] No sound on AppImage previews

2022-10-13 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=456512 --- Comment #13 from Nicofo --- Note that as you asked, I have tested with KDE Plasma -> same result. And also Gnome X11 or Wayland does not change anything. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 456512] No sound on AppImage previews

2022-10-13 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=456512 --- Comment #12 from Nicofo --- Indeed Maik, I'm using Fedora with Gnome. "Enable internal debug logging" was already deactivated. And I don't use debug environment variable (AFAIK, unless they are used by default?). Not

[digikam] [Bug 456512] No sound on AppImage previews

2022-10-13 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=456512 --- Comment #9 from Nicofo --- (In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #8) > The current AppImage now plays sound here again. > > Maik There is indeed a change in the last AppImage: - there is some sound, but with a lot of noise - and

[digikam] [Bug 456512] No sound on AppImage previews

2022-10-05 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=456512 Nicofo changed: What|Removed |Added Version|7.7.0 |7.8.0 CC

[digikam] [Bug 425047] Trash icon should reflect if trash is full or empty

2022-07-12 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425047 Nicofo changed: What|Removed |Added Version|7.8.0 |7.7.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[digikam] [Bug 425047] Trash icon should reflect if trash is full or empty

2022-07-12 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425047 Nicofo changed: What|Removed |Added Version|7.0.0 |7.8.0 Platform|Fedora RPMs

[digikam] [Bug 451780] New: Appimage 7.6 does not work on Fedora

2022-03-21 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=451780 Bug ID: 451780 Summary: Appimage 7.6 does not work on Fedora Product: digikam Version: 7.6.0 Platform: Appimage OS: Linux Status: REPORTED Severity: normal

[digikam] [Bug 425047] Trash icon should reflect if trash is full or empty

2022-01-09 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425047 --- Comment #5 from Nicofo --- Additional info: I think that the Trash icon's name is: - user-trash (empty trash) - user-trash-full (full trash) I searched in the code for "user-trash" -> several matches I searched in the code fo

[digikam] [Bug 425047] Trash icon should reflect if trash is full or empty

2022-01-09 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425047 --- Comment #4 from Nicofo --- Hi Gilles and happy new year too ! I tested again -> same result: see attachment in comment #2 Best regards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 447150] AppImage 7.4 does not work on Fedora

2021-12-28 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447150 --- Comment #18 from Nicofo --- (In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #17) > Ok, i close this file file. > > Happy new year > > Gilles Best wishes for 2022 for digiKam team 🎄 Always great to see how digiKam continues to evolv

[digikam] [Bug 447150] AppImage 7.4 does not work on Fedora

2021-12-28 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447150 --- Comment #16 from Nicofo --- Hi Gilles, Great, without surprise, it works with the last Appimage. Let's see if there is no regression for other users/systems... Thanks ! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 447150] AppImage 7.4 does not work on Fedora

2021-12-27 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447150 --- Comment #13 from Nicofo --- Thanks. Yes, I see your last commits in that AppImage. It is still not working, unless like in comment #7 I give priority to system libraries. Here is the result with your last bundle (not changed): $ ./digiKam-7.5.0

[digikam] [Bug 447150] AppImage 7.4 does not work on Fedora

2021-12-27 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447150 --- Comment #7 from Nicofo --- Hello Gilles, I made some tests in AppRun file. In "preload_shared_library" function, I see you prioritize the libraries from the bundles instead of those of the system. I suppose there is good reason for tha

[digikam] [Bug 447150] AppImage 7.4 does not work on Fedora

2021-12-26 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447150 Nicofo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[digikam] [Bug 447150] AppImage 7.4 does not work on Fedora

2021-12-18 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447150 --- Comment #2 from Nicofo --- (In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #1) > Wayland or X doesn't matter, the problem has already been reported here: Bug > 445629. > > Maik OK. I saw that bug, but thought it was Wayland-related (that

[digikam] [Bug 447150] New: AppImage 7.4 does not work on Fedora

2021-12-17 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447150 Bug ID: 447150 Summary: AppImage 7.4 does not work on Fedora Product: digikam Version: 7.4.0 Platform: Appimage OS: Linux Status: REPORTED Severity: normal

[digikam] [Bug 446750] Can't export to onedrive: unable to login then crash

2021-12-11 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446750 --- Comment #8 from Nicofo --- (In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #7) > Yes, Help Components Info dialog show this information. And yes you use > QtWebEngine (Chromium in fact) Thanks Gilles. But then I don't understand Mai

[digikam] [Bug 446750] Can't export to onedrive: unable to login then crash

2021-12-11 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446750 --- Comment #6 from Nicofo --- (In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #4) > The problem is known and will not work with the AppImage either. OnDrive > does not work with the outdated QWebKit browser. Here native digiKam with > QWebEng

[digikam] [Bug 446750] Can't export to onedrive: unable to login then crash

2021-12-09 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446750 --- Comment #2 from Nicofo --- additional info: digikam appimage 7.4.0 starts with following command line: LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib64/libssl.so.1.1:/usr/lib64/libcrypto.so.1.1 ./digiKam-7.4.0-20211209T121203-x86-64.appimage But then the behaviour is

[digikam] [Bug 446750] Can't export to onedrive: unable to login then crash

2021-12-09 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446750 --- Comment #1 from Nicofo --- Created attachment 144406 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=144406&action=edit Digikam 7.3.0 crash log When I click on "Change account" (see at the end of attached file): unknown: UNLINK

[digikam] [Bug 446750] New: Can't export to onedrive: unable to login then crash

2021-12-09 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446750 Bug ID: 446750 Summary: Can't export to onedrive: unable to login then crash Product: digikam Version: 7.3.0 Platform: Appimage OS: Linux Status: REPORTED Severi

[digikam] [Bug 435303] Digikam crashes when selecting 2 times Item opening Web Window in Help menu

2021-04-04 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435303 Nicofo changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REPORTED

[digikam] [Bug 435303] Digikam crashes when selecting 2 times Item opening Web Window in Help menu

2021-04-03 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435303 --- Comment #4 from Nicofo --- (In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #3) > You said 2 times opening item menu ? For ex, you open Help/Donate, the web > page is show, you don't close it, and you re-try Help/donate, and in this > case y

[digikam] [Bug 415879] Drag and drop of face to people Tag -> inappropriate popup

2021-04-03 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415879 Nicofo changed: What|Removed |Added Version|7.3.0 |7.2.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[digikam] [Bug 435303] New: Digikam crashes when selecting 2 times Item opening Web Window in Help menu

2021-04-03 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435303 Bug ID: 435303 Summary: Digikam crashes when selecting 2 times Item opening Web Window in Help menu Product: digikam Version: 7.2.0 Platform: Appimage OS: Linux

[digikam] [Bug 415879] Drag and drop of face to people Tag -> inappropriate popup

2021-04-03 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415879 Nicofo changed: What|Removed |Added Version|7.2.0 |7.3.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[digikam] [Bug 415879] Drag and drop of face to people Tag -> inappropriate popup

2021-04-03 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415879 --- Comment #3 from Nicofo --- Created attachment 137304 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=137304&action=edit Inappropriate popup "Assign Tag 'Jack' to Item" A simple screenshot is better to explain the issue ;)

[digikam] [Bug 415879] Drag and drop of face to people Tag -> inappropriate popup

2020-12-30 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415879 Nicofo changed: What|Removed |Added Version|7.0.0 |7.2.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[digikam] [Bug 415880] Add a way to easily correct a face name

2020-12-30 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415880 Nicofo changed: What|Removed |Added Version Fixed In|7.2.0 | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[digikam] [Bug 415880] Add a way to easily correct a face name

2020-12-30 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415880 Nicofo changed: What|Removed |Added Version|7.0.0 |7.2.0 Resolution|FIXED

[elisa] [Bug 428032] New: Duplicated icons of Elisa in Gnome menu

2020-10-20 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428032 Bug ID: 428032 Summary: Duplicated icons of Elisa in Gnome menu Product: elisa Version: 20.04.2 Platform: Other OS: Linux Status: REPORTED Severity: normal

[digikam] [Bug 425884] GPS Processing Method: "charset=Ascii" to remove

2020-08-28 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425884 --- Comment #3 from Nicofo --- Useful information: (In reply to Nicofo from comment #0) > Note: GPSProcessingMethod and GPSAreaInformation are both encoded in the > same way as EXIF UserComment. (see details > https://github.com/Exiv2/exiv2/is

[digikam] [Bug 425884] GPS Processing Method: "charset=Ascii" to remove

2020-08-28 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425884 --- Comment #2 from Nicofo --- (In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #1) > And ??? > > What did you expect from digiKam side ? you want to remove what ? The tags > content ? The whole tags as well from the list ? I expect that: c

[digikam] [Bug 425884] New: GPS Processing Method: "charset=Ascii" to remove

2020-08-27 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425884 Bug ID: 425884 Summary: GPS Processing Method: "charset=Ascii" to remove Product: digikam Version: 7.1.0 Platform: Other OS: Linux Status: REPORTED Severity: nor

[digikam] [Bug 425047] Trash icon should reflect if trash is full or empty

2020-08-05 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425047 --- Comment #2 from Nicofo --- Created attachment 130669 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=130669&action=edit Trash icons Really ? Seems empty to me ;) See printscreen, done with 2 themes (Adwaita and Breeze). - Trash of &

[digikam] [Bug 425047] New: Trash icon should reflect if trash is full or empty

2020-08-05 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425047 Bug ID: 425047 Summary: Trash icon should reflect if trash is full or empty Product: digikam Version: 7.0.0 Platform: Fedora RPMs OS: Linux Status: REPORTED Seve

[digikam] [Bug 329976] SCAN : digiKam does not update database after picture renaming

2020-08-05 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=329976 --- Comment #17 from Nicofo --- Hi Gilles, Correct me if I'm wrong: I was wondering why some attributes are correct and others not after the manipulation described in comment #8 (rename pictures outside of digikam). - attributes that are co

[digikam] [Bug 416180] Number of "new items" not updated after face recognition

2020-08-05 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=416180 --- Comment #7 from Nicofo --- Sorry, my mistake, you are right. But indeed there is a timer (2-3 seconds) before the counter is updated. I made the test by rejecting a face (in "Unconfirmed" tag). I expected that the treatment of rejectin

[digikam] [Bug 415879] Drag and drop of face to people Tag -> inappropriate popup

2020-08-04 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415879 --- Comment #2 from Nicofo --- Same behaviour as in comment #1 with DK 7.0.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 329976] SCAN : digiKam does not update database after picture renaming

2020-08-04 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=329976 Nicofo changed: What|Removed |Added Version Fixed In|5.1.0 | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[digikam] [Bug 329976] SCAN : digiKam does not update database after picture renaming

2020-08-04 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=329976 --- Comment #16 from Nicofo --- I tested again with DK 7.0.0: result is exactly the same as in previous comment (comment #14) -> not OK with tags and ratings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 329976] SCAN : digiKam does not update database after picture renaming

2020-08-04 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=329976 Nicofo changed: What|Removed |Added Version|5.8.0 |7.0.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[digikam] [Bug 416180] Number of "new items" not updated after face recognition

2020-08-04 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=416180 Nicofo changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Resolution|FIXED

[kio-extras] [Bug 316390] Text preview - problem with accents (wrong characters encoding ?)

2020-05-16 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316390 Nicofo changed: What|Removed |Added Version|18.04.3 |19.12 --- Comment #14 from Nicofo --- (versions

[gwenview] [Bug 385240] Better METADATA handling - add search field

2020-05-16 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385240 Nicofo changed: What|Removed |Added Version|16.12.3 |19.12.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[gwenview] [Bug 385241] Better METADATA handling - keep scroll level when moving from one picture to another

2020-05-16 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385241 Nicofo changed: What|Removed |Added Version|16.12.3 |19.12.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[gwenview] [Bug 327829] Better METADATA handling

2020-05-16 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=327829 Nicofo changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.11.3 |19.12.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[digikam] [Bug 406586] Item count in "People" is not updated until you click or hover a tag

2020-02-08 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406586 Nicofo changed: What|Removed |Added Version|6.1.0 |7.0.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[digikam] [Bug 413855] digiKam crashes when deleting a letter in the login window (QtWebkit + libicu)

2020-01-16 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413855 --- Comment #11 from Nicofo --- Hi Gilles, I just tested digikam-7.0.0-beta2-20200116T110715-x86-64 -> no problem anymore related to this bug. Thanks! The change to QtWebEngine is just a test, or is it decided to abandon Webkit from now

[digikam] [Bug 413855] Digikam crashes when deleting a letter in the login window

2020-01-12 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413855 Nicofo changed: What|Removed |Added Version|6.4.0 |7.0.0 --- Comment #8 from Nicofo --- (In reply to

[digikam] [Bug 416180] Number of "new items" not updated after face recognistion

2020-01-12 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=416180 --- Comment #1 from Nicofo --- Same similar problem whith: - in Unconfirmed tag, remove reject a face of e.g. "Jack" - The counter associated to "Jack" tag is not updated (unless you click on "Jack"'s tag) -- You a

[digikam] [Bug 416180] New: Number of "new items" not updated after face recognistion

2020-01-12 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=416180 Bug ID: 416180 Summary: Number of "new items" not updated after face recognistion Product: digikam Version: 7.0.0 Platform: Other OS: Linux Status: REP

[digikam] [Bug 416018] Face detection: specified list of albums not taken into account

2020-01-12 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=416018 --- Comment #11 from Nicofo --- Thank you, I have tested with appimage digikam-7.0.0-beta2-20200112T071518-x86-64 and no more problem. I'll answer to myself for my questions in comment #9: (3) If Albums AND Tags are selected in "Search in&qu

[digikam] [Bug 416018] Face detection: specified list of albums not taken into account

2020-01-09 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=416018 --- Comment #9 from Nicofo --- Thank you for your quick reaction and look in the code ;) I'll test when new appimage available. Still can you explain exactly what I need to do to scan for faces (face detection) a specific Album (and only that

[digikam] [Bug 416028] New: "Search in Tags" selection for Face detection/recognition unduly changes

2020-01-08 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=416028 Bug ID: 416028 Summary: "Search in Tags" selection for Face detection/recognition unduly changes Product: digikam Version: 7.0.0 Platform: Other OS: Linux

[digikam] [Bug 416018] Face detection: specified list of albums not taken into account

2020-01-08 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=416018 --- Comment #5 from Nicofo --- (In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #4) > We have this reported as an error several times. I have never been able to > reproduce it here. Only the selected albums are scanned. I've debugged the > code

  1   2   3   >