https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=371447
--- Comment #7 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 101723
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=101723&action=edit
kscreen kcm after resuming
It completely lost state. Laptop display is disabled *and* not on the left of
the external d
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=371447
--- Comment #5 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 101690
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=101690&action=edit
kscreen-console bug after enabling laptop display
This is the state I desire after resuming.
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=371447
--- Comment #6 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 101691
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=101691&action=edit
kscreen.log after enabling laptop display again
and moving it to the left side (instead of clone mode) as it was before
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=371447
--- Comment #4 from Martin Steigerwald ---
martin@merkaba:~> kscreen-doctor output.LVDS-1.enable
Enabling output 65
kscreen.doctor: setop exec returned
works, but enabled LVDS in clone mode. So it seems that kscreen completely
forgot that the laptop sc
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=371447
--- Comment #1 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 101687
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=101687&action=edit
kscreen.log
It appears to me that for whatever reason kscreen does not activate the second
output:
21.10.2016 17:35:39
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=371447
--- Comment #3 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 101689
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=101689&action=edit
kscreen-console bug directly after resume
Dunno what it wanted to parse from kscreen.log, but I attached this separatel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=371447
--- Comment #2 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 101688
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=101688&action=edit
kscreen-doctor -i --json after resume
internal laptop display LVDS-1 (65) is disabled.
However according to kscreen lo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=371447
Bug ID: 371447
Summary: laptop screen disabled after resume from suspend to
RAM
Product: KScreen
Version: 5.8.2
Platform: Debian unstable
OS: Linux
Sta
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340813
--- Comment #11 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Yay! Thank you, Dan! Would you backport this to 16.08 as well?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368686
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368686
Bug ID: 368686
Summary: frozen session after swiching sessions when using two
sessions
Product: ksmserver
Version: 5.7.3
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Stat
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367892
--- Comment #4 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Hello Daniel. I am talking about the visible response in KMail. I did not check
if there is something happening on the IMAP server. For IMAP, in company with
Exchange, but I also tested with Dovecot IMAP on my
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #30 from Martin Steigerwald ---
I just created
Bug 367892 - During folder synchronisation Akonadi blocks out other operations
like deleting or viewing mails
for blocking out other operations during folder synchronisation. Gunther, if
you f
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367892
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367892
Bug ID: 367892
Summary: During folder synchronisation Akonadi blocks out other
operations like deleting or viewing mails
Product: Akonadi
Version: 16.04
Platform: Debian unstable
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=279380
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |UNMAINTAINED
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=307064
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |UNMAINTAINED
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334216
--- Comment #1 from Martin Steigerwald ---
This still happens with KMail/Akonadi 16.04. Its not nearly as annoying as
Akonadi maildir resource is much faster now on synchronisation folders. Its
still synchronizing although it should know which mails mai
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334209
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334206
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|REOPENED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334206
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #29 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Okay, nope changing the title on the bug report I mentioned on the third issue
doesn´t make sense. I don´t see this bug anymore since performance improvements
made by Dan and Millian. It makes sense to split o
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #28 from Martin Steigerwald ---
There seem to be three issues in what you observe:
1) There is folder synchronisation when you enter a folder and click mails in
there to read them. I don´t have that and for me this operation is, except for
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #27 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 100801
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=100801&action=edit
excerpt of query log for folder synchronisation after deleting mails
I sometimes need to delete quite a bunch of mails
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #25 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Okay, I seriously don´t get why its so different for you: One folder with about
1 mails about one second with cold caches and one with more than 24000
mails about 2-3 seconds with cold caches. This time on
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #26 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 100800
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=100800&action=edit
excerpt of query log, clicking mails in open folders for some seconds
This is what is almost instant on my machine.
-
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #23 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Hmmm, okay, now I notice there is an important difference. I tested this
against a local maildir resource, not with IMAP. I think… I bet that may cause
a difference in MySQL load. Do you use disconnected IMAP
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #22 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Gunther, I am not sure what is going on on your system, cause when I access a
76000 mails folder it takes about 8 seconds to actually see KMail showing the
first mails and starting the threading operation. Or
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #19 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Gunter, how big is your sent folder? How many mails are in there.
And, I am not sure whether it has been mentioned already, but my better
experience may (!) be related to some manual MySQL tuning. Especially:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367708
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[Exchange 2013] Error on|[Exchange 2013] Saving sent
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367708
--- Comment #1 from Martin Steigerwald ---
I intend to try to access Exchange server directly instead of by proxy to
determine whether its a proxy issue.
I also created IMAP log. Here is what I think the relevant excerpt of it:
C: A22 SELECT "INBO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367708
Bug ID: 367708
Summary: [Exchange 2013] Error on saving sent mail to IMAP
folder: A07 BAD Command Argument Error. 12
Product: Akonadi
Version: 16.04
Platform: Debian unstable
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364114
--- Comment #5 from Martin Steigerwald ---
https://phabricator.kde.org/T630
is somewhat related.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=170425
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
Status|UNC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316107
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |REOPENED
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364114
--- Comment #4 from Martin Steigerwald ---
I see how it is challenging to solve this within current Akonadi design. If
using a folder ID that is just stored within the database, it won´t detect
manual moves. But well, it could write a .folderinfo file i
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364114
--- Comment #3 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Okay, it took about 10 minutes and several GiB of disk traffic, but it seems it
is now done. Folders at their new location do not yet display amount of unread
mails and I expect Akonadi to create even more I/O
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364114
--- Comment #2 from Martin Steigerwald ---
And yeah, I bet I know what its doing: Its removing all the stale mails entries
from the mysqld database and then adding them again at the new location. Also
KMail still showed the folders at their old location
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364114
--- Comment #1 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Today I tried to be clever:
- I just stopped Akonadi and waited till it was gone (including mysqld
process).
- Then I manually moved several large folders with LKML mails, one with 26+
mails within the mai
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #17 from Martin Steigerwald ---
I am running with 16.04 already, but it was already way faster with 15.12.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #16 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Tore, two things:
1) AFAIK KMail 15.12 neeeds Akonadi 15.12 or at least any *other* Qt 5 based
Akonadi. Akonadi 1.13 to my knowledge is Qt 4 based. So I wonder why it works
at all on your system. It might be
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361588
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361588
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |FIXED
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=354056
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363851
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|mar...@lichtvoll.de |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363851
--- Comment #20 from Martin Steigerwald ---
I think one major issue here is that systemd then doesn´t seem to handle
shutdown different to log out, i.e. I and quite some other users I read from
prefer processes to be kept running on logout, but when I s
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363851
--- Comment #8 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Entirely your choice and in the end I don´t care, cause I do not intend to use
Neon. Yet, you mask bugs this way.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363851
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=233069
--- Comment #16 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Sad, but understandable Boudewijn. I had data losses myself, but the last has
been a very long time ago. I think Akonadi got much more stable related to data
safety, but I can understand you.
--
You are rece
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=297858
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336859
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290393
--- Comment #5 from Martin Steigerwald ---
If Akonadi behaves similarily as I described in
364114 - moving a folder within one maildir resource is extremely slow and
inefficient
with mbox folders, this may explain quite a lot of the slowness you descr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=233069
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364114
Bug ID: 364114
Summary: moving a folder within one maildir resource is
extremely slow and inefficient
Product: Akonadi
Version: 16.04
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290393
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
--- Comment #4 from Ma
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316107
--- Comment #33 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Sudhir, I have no idea what Zoho displays there. I only know zoho.com as a
source for spam that reaches my mailbox so far. I suggest you talk back with
Zoho support on this one. Let us know is KDEPIM/Akonadi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311184
--- Comment #8 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Johannes, thank you for the imformation. Please report a new bug tough in order
to have it being free of old and outdated information about an unmaintained
release of KDEPIM.
Also explain exactly what you are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=354400
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
--- Comment #43 from M
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361737
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|duplicates values in|slowdown on pop3 download
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361737
--- Comment #22 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Hmmm, no, the times are different. Oh, they have always been, just the same of
each retrieval attempt it seems. I completely missed that all the time cause
they looked all the same, as I usually have several h
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361737
--- Comment #21 from Martin Steigerwald ---
This still happens with Applications/16.04. Since starting Akonadi + KMail
16.04 + setting to leave mail on server for one day it received six mails. This
is the result:
martin@merkaba:~/.config> cat akonadi_
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361737
--- Comment #20 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Thanks for the support, Michael. I never was clear on what to put into
branch-group to get the desired result. I somehow managed to have kdesrc-build
to build from an Applications branch.
Now rebuilding with
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362699
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362695
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361737
--- Comment #16 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Hi Albert, from reading about branch and branch-group in kdesrc-build doc¹ I do
not get what to tell kdesrc build to build Applications/15.06 for me instead of
master.
In branch-group I can specify what modul
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361737
--- Comment #14 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Albert, seenUidTimeList also contains duplicated values, but if its the value
in which it saw the uid in question and it saw them all at the same time, it
may be correct. I don´t know how the code works. I wou
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361588
--- Comment #3 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Thank you, Laurent. I plan to do a recompile of KDEPIM once I have a working Qt
5.6 setup. Right now I plan to wait for Debian packages of Qt 5.6.1, hopefully
beginning / mid of May. I think currently I do not
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353538
--- Comment #4 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Thanks, Kai. Well, I have no idea about it then. I bet I wait till I get a more
consistent versioning state. I do use Debian Sid/Experimental packages + self
compiled KF5 from some weeks ago (in order to use se
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353538
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |WORKSFORME
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361737
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361737
--- Comment #9 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Hi Laurent, I can´t test it, as I do not have Qt 5.6 on my Debian
Sid/Experimental setup and I gathered that KDEPIM requires it since a week or
so. I do have kdesrc-build and while a recompile of KDEPIM is easy
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361737
--- Comment #8 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 98669
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=98669&action=edit
excessive duplicates in akonadi_pop3_resource_0rc
Albert, the duplicates easily get excessive. Here an example of it with
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316107
--- Comment #31 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Additionally for "So, can you still reproduce this with KMail from KDEPIM 4.14
and Akonadi 1.13?" I´d update this to KDEPIM + Akonadi 15.12. Please test with
that version as KDEPIM 4 and Akonadi 1.13 are not s
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316107
--- Comment #30 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Hello Sudhir, read comment #27. I specified what information I ask for there.
Thanks, Martin
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361704
--- Comment #10 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Hmmm, thanks. I think it is of big importance to focus on the stability of the
whole stack. In the end no matter whether its Qt or KF5 / Plasma causing the
issue if the user experience is affected like that. I
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343186
--- Comment #3 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Thanks, David. Together with my MySQL database config optimizations 30 seconds
are indeed enough to cold start KMail + Akonadi. Without the optimization
Akonadi startup takes longer than 30 seconds and I still
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361704
--- Comment #8 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Any further info you´d still want for that unmapped Akregator window? Otherwise
I´d restart Akregator as well in order to use it again :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug chang
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361704
--- Comment #7 from Martin Steigerwald ---
I restarted kmail, but Akregator still hides away, seems the window is
unmapped:
> xwininfo -name "Akregator"
xwininfo: Window id: 0xa000ba "Akregator"
Absolute upper-left X: 1920
Absolute upper-left Y:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361704
--- Comment #5 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 98394
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=98394&action=edit
xwininfo -root -tree after external display disconnected, kmail window still
exists
Thomas, the kmail window still exists
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361737
Bug ID: 361737
Summary: duplicates values in SeenUidList and SeenUidTimeList
until it crawls to an halt on saving messages
Product: Akonadi
Version: GIT (master)
Platform: Other
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341497
--- Comment #57 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Just to make it clear here, the QT-BUG –
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-42985 – also refers to disappearing
windows, not just crashes. From reading from the QTBUG I bet the issue is fixed
in Qt 5.5.1 wi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361704
--- Comment #3 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Hmmm, I didn´t see any kwin_x11 crashes. Maybe not reported by Dr. Konqi?
I will try the xwinfo -root -tree thing next time and post here.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug cha
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361704
--- Comment #1 from Martin Steigerwald ---
kscreen is also 5.5.4 on the system. KF5 is compiled from git master as of last
weekend. 5.6 Plasma is not yet available on Debian and free space on filesystem
is small, so compiling it from master might exceed
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361704
Bug ID: 361704
Summary: window on external screen disappears when hibernating
with external screen connected and resuming when it is
not connected
Product: kwin
Version:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361590
--- Comment #1 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 98316
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=98316&action=edit
there are no navigation buttons next to the other three buttons in the toolbar
In older Akregator versions there have bee
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361590
Bug ID: 361590
Summary: navigation buttons missing in internal webbrowser
Product: akregator
Version: GIT (master)
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361588
--- Comment #1 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 98315
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=98315&action=edit
This is how Akregator displays text from pro-linux.de
Also affected are Heise Open heise.de/open, as well as KDE Dot News
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361588
Bug ID: 361588
Summary: Text of articles from certain websites displayed way
too small
Product: akregator
Version: GIT (master)
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360834
--- Comment #6 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Knut, it is safe to remove them (but only the file_lost+found files not
file_db_data!). That Akonadi leaks files in file_db_data which akonadictl fsck
moves to lost+found is a known bug that has been fixed. The
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360834
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360834
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||piedro.kul...@googlemail.co
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344242
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360834
--- Comment #2 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Oh and Dan later added that "server" actually means any resource, so "server"
could also be a local maildir or calender file or what not.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug chang
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344242
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
--- Comment #7 from Ma
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360834
--- Comment #1 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Adding link to Dan´s mail in the thread "Akonadictl fsck" on kdepim-users where
he explains this:
https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdepim-users/2016-March/000113.html
Also this report might be a duplicate of bu
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360811
--- Comment #2 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Gregor, thanks for your input. That is a different, but related feature. I´d
like to see this as well. Please open a new bug about this and post a link
here. Thanks. (One issue / feature in one bug.)
--
You a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=339181
--- Comment #18 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Wow, thank you, Dan. I may even test if, if I configure my IMAP account again,
I removed it cause Akonadi was too slow, yet, I found it replaced mysql.conf in
a recent upgrade due to a setting deprecated in My
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=339181
--- Comment #14 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Added a bug report about the no rid, no option to reattempt to push item into
server issue:
Bug 360834 - no mechanism to reattempt to store items without rid (just in db)
into the resource
--
You are recei
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360834
Bug ID: 360834
Summary: no mechanism to reattempt to store items without rid
(just in db) into the resource
Product: Akonadi
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
O
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=339181
--- Comment #13 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Okay, Dan didn´t really confirm the bug, actually there are two bugs: The one
with moving mails from cached IMAP to local folder, the other is generally that
on failures there are items without RID, which are
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
