[digikam] [Bug 428652] Picture stays in people tag "Unknown" even though it was set to not contain a face.

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428652 --- Comment #12 from LarsE --- @Gilles I started digikam 8.0.0 with a fresh local database on my system, since I changed to a complete local data workflow. Unfortunately currently I'm not able to scan my collection for faces at all using digikam

[digikam] [Bug 431037] Very poor performance when applying actions (e.g. refresh folder, apply tag) -> takes very long with 7.2.0 Beta-2

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431037 --- Comment #18 from LarsE --- Thanks for the reminder. Unfortunately I changed my data workflow in the meantime and all photos are accessed locally now. Therefore digikam is working very fast which puts much joy into my processing workflow now :-). I

[digikam] [Bug 447503] Problem reading Excire Foto software tags from JPEG files

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447503 --- Comment #7 from LarsE --- (In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #6) > If tags have disappeared after the 2nd run, then you have activated the > option to clean up the database by reading metadata. I was looking for such option, but didn

[digikam] [Bug 447503] Problem reading Excire Foto software tags from JPEG files

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447503 --- Comment #4 from LarsE --- (In reply to LarsE from comment #3) > Great to hear that the import is possible, I didn't try to change the order, > since it was not clear to me, that as soon as one active definition matches, > al

[digikam] [Bug 447503] Problem reading Excire Foto software tags from JPEG files

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447503 --- Comment #3 from LarsE --- Hi Maik, thanks for your quick reply and your explanation which I really appreciate! Great to hear that the import is possible, I didn't try to change the order, since it was not clear to me, that as soon as one a

[digikam] [Bug 447503] Problem reading 3rd party software tags from JPEG files

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447503 --- Comment #1 from LarsE --- Created attachment 144854 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=144854&action=edit JPEG file with Xmp.dc.subject and Xmp.excire.hierarchicalSubject element to reproduce this issue -- You are receiving th

[digikam] [Bug 447503] New: Problem reading 3rd party software tags from JPEG files

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447503 Bug ID: 447503 Summary: Problem reading 3rd party software tags from JPEG files Product: digikam Version: 7.4.0 Platform: Microsoft Windows OS: Microsoft Windows

[digikam] [Bug 431037] Very poor performance when applying actions (e.g. refresh folder, apply tag) -> takes very long with 7.2.0 Beta-2

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431037 --- Comment #12 from LarsE --- Created attachment 135308 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=135308&action=edit 7.2.0 beta2 LAN -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 431037] Very poor performance when applying actions (e.g. refresh folder, apply tag) -> takes very long with 7.2.0 Beta-2

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431037 --- Comment #11 from LarsE --- Created attachment 135307 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=135307&action=edit 7.2.0 beta1 LAN -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 431037] Very poor performance when applying actions (e.g. refresh folder, apply tag) -> takes very long with 7.2.0 Beta-2

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431037 --- Comment #10 from LarsE --- Created attachment 135306 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=135306&action=edit 7.2.0 beta1 WiFi -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 431037] Very poor performance when applying actions (e.g. refresh folder, apply tag) -> takes very long with 7.2.0 Beta-2

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431037 --- Comment #9 from LarsE --- Sorry that it took some time to come back with my results from testing, but spare-time was quite limited during the last weeks ;-) I did some research and updated my mariadb installation from 10.5.4 (which indeed had some

[digikam] [Bug 431037] Very poor performance when applying actions (e.g. refresh folder, apply tag) -> takes very long with 7.2.0 Beta-2

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431037 --- Comment #8 from LarsE --- Hi Maik, thanks for your quick reply (as always ;-). I will do some testing on my side and come back with the results. Apart from WiFi, etc. I'm still wondering, why applying tags (not immediately syncing with the

[digikam] [Bug 431037] Very poor performance when applying actions (e.g. refresh folder, apply tag) -> takes very long with 7.2.0 Beta-2

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431037 --- Comment #6 from LarsE --- Created attachment 13 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=13&action=edit progressbar screenshot 02 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 431037] Very poor performance when applying actions (e.g. refresh folder, apply tag) -> takes very long with 7.2.0 Beta-2

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431037 --- Comment #5 from LarsE --- Created attachment 134443 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=134443&action=edit progressbar screenshot 01 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 431037] Very poor performance when applying actions (e.g. refresh folder, apply tag) -> takes very long with 7.2.0 Beta-2

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431037 --- Comment #4 from LarsE --- Created attachment 134442 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=134442&action=edit Logging -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 431037] Very poor performance when applying actions (e.g. refresh folder, apply tag) -> takes very long with 7.2.0 Beta-2

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431037 --- Comment #3 from LarsE --- @Gilles: I went from Beta-1 to Beta-2 and performance regarding tagging decreased remarkable. Performance when adding a new folder or refreshing an existing was never so fine, also with the last stable release. So I

[digikam] [Bug 431037] New: Very poor performance when applying actions (e.g. refresh folder, apply tag) -> takes very long with 7.2.0 Beta-2

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431037 Bug ID: 431037 Summary: Very poor performance when applying actions (e.g. refresh folder, apply tag) -> takes very long with 7.2.0 Beta-2 Product: digikam Version: 7.2.0

[digikam] [Bug 428733] New: import window always keeps last image

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428733 Bug ID: 428733 Summary: import window always keeps last image Product: digikam Version: 7.2.0 Platform: Microsoft Windows OS: Microsoft Windows Status: REPORTED

[digikam] [Bug 428652] Picture stays in people tag "Unknown" even though it was set to not contain a face.

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428652 --- Comment #9 from LarsE --- Comment on attachment 133052 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=133052 Another debug log processing an image with manually created face region -> red "x" works for a manually created face reg

[digikam] [Bug 428652] Picture stays in people tag "Unknown" even though it was set to not contain a face.

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428652 --- Comment #8 from LarsE --- Created attachment 133052 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=133052&action=edit Another debug log processing an image with manually created face region Please see the notes inside the logging. Best regard

[digikam] [Bug 428652] Picture stays in people tag "Unknown" even though it was set to not contain a face.

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428652 --- Comment #6 from LarsE --- Hi Maik, obviously I missed it :-) sorry. I attached the log to this ticket containg my remarks regarding what I clicked in the GUI. Bye, Lars. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 428652] Picture stays in people tag "Unknown" even though it was set to not contain a face.

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428652 --- Comment #5 from LarsE --- Created attachment 133009 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=133009&action=edit debug log when clicking the red "x" on a face tag thumbnail rated "Unknown" -- You are receiving

[digikam] [Bug 428652] Picture stays in people tag "Unknown" even though it was set to not contain a face.

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428652 --- Comment #3 from LarsE --- Hi Maik, here you are. Clicking the "-" icon does nothing on my system. Bye, Lars. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>&g

[digikam] [Bug 428652] New: Picture stays in people tag "Unknown" even though it was set to not contain a face.

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428652 Bug ID: 428652 Summary: Picture stays in people tag "Unknown" even though it was set to not contain a face. Product: digikam Version: 7.2.0 Platform: Microsoft Windows

[digikam] [Bug 424691] Thumbnails not showing for face tags [patch]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424691 --- Comment #29 from LarsE --- Hi Maik, I just installed 7.2.0 beta-1 -> activated View / Include Tag-Subtree -> works. The faces thumbnails are shown also with this setting, now. I appreciate your work on this issue - thanks and have a goo

[digikam] [Bug 424691] Thumbnails not showing for face tags

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424691 --- Comment #20 from LarsE --- Hi Maik, thanks for further investigating this issue. This is somehow strange -> please have a look at my comments 7 and 10: the database user "digikam" already has all rights and all grants assigned (in

[digikam] [Bug 425125] New: User Comment shown as "binary comment"

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425125 Bug ID: 425125 Summary: User Comment shown as "binary comment" Product: digikam Version: 7.0.0 Platform: Microsoft Windows OS: Microsoft Windows Status: REPORTED

[digikam] [Bug 424691] Thumbnails not showing for face tags

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424691 --- Comment #16 from LarsE --- Hi Maik, Thanks for your support, deactivating in View works like a charm also with the digikam@192.168.178.__ user. Bye, Lars. From: Maik Qualmann Sent: Saturday, August 1, 2020 7:04:17

[digikam] [Bug 424691] Thumbnails not showing for face tags

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424691 --- Comment #12 from LarsE --- Thanks for looking deeper into this. I always used the mySQL mariaDB database, when I started with digikam some time ago. I set up an empty database and let digikam go and index all photos of my collection. So I have no

[digikam] [Bug 424691] Thumbnails not showing for face tags

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424691 --- Comment #10 from LarsE --- Hi Maik, today I had some time to do some more testing. Please see the results below. I think it's important to put some more information in advance to allow for a better understanding of my set-up: - I'm wo

[digikam] [Bug 424691] Thumbnails not showing for face tags

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424691 --- Comment #7 from LarsE --- You were right, it seems to be a database related issue - some access error is shown in the log. Please refer to the attached file. I'm not sure, which access rights might be missing, since the mentioned user ha

[digikam] [Bug 424691] Thumbnails not showing for face tags

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424691 --- Comment #6 from LarsE --- Created attachment 130450 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=130450&action=edit extended log showing database access error -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 424691] Thumbnails not showing for face tags

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424691 --- Comment #4 from LarsE --- Thanks for your quick reply - here comes the output of DebugView after starting digikam: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2404] QCommandLineParser: already having a

[digikam] [Bug 424691] New: Thumbnails not showing for face tags

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424691 Bug ID: 424691 Summary: Thumbnails not showing for face tags Product: digikam Version: 7.0.0 Platform: Microsoft Windows OS: Microsoft Windows Status: REPORTED S