[valgrind] [Bug 400538] vex amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x48 0xCF 0xF 0x1F 0x0 0xFF 0xD2 0xCC 0x90 0x55

2019-03-16 Thread Doug Johnson
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400538 --- Comment #6 from Doug Johnson --- Comment on attachment 118834 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=118834 IRETQ Test Case >#include >#include > >void return_from_iret() { >printf("Hello From IRETQ\n"); &g

[valgrind] [Bug 400538] vex amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x48 0xCF 0xF 0x1F 0x0 0xFF 0xD2 0xCC 0x90 0x55

2019-03-16 Thread Doug Johnson
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400538 --- Comment #5 from Doug Johnson --- Created attachment 118834 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=118834&action=edit IRETQ Test Case I went ahead and implemented a minimal test case which is attached. I confirmed the code runs fine o

[valgrind] [Bug 400538] vex amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x48 0xCF 0xF 0x1F 0x0 0xFF 0xD2 0xCC 0x90 0x55

2019-03-13 Thread Doug Johnson
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400538 --- Comment #3 from Doug Johnson --- See the wine source here for usage of IRETQ: https://github.com/wine-mirror/wine/blob/master/dlls/ntdll/signal_x86_64.c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[valgrind] [Bug 400538] vex amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x48 0xCF 0xF 0x1F 0x0 0xFF 0xD2 0xCC 0x90 0x55

2019-03-13 Thread Doug Johnson
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400538 Doug Johnson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dou...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Doug