[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845047#action_12845047
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2293:
---
{quote}
but does anyone out there wanna wor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845048#action_12845048
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2293:
---
I'm tempted to get rid of the pooling for P
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845049#action_12845049
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2318:
---
bq. Uwe, can you default to "java.io.tmpdir
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-2314.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision: 922797
> Add AttributeSource.copyTo(AttributeSource)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845056#action_12845056
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2293:
bq. Or do you want to commit the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845057#action_12845057
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2312:
Michael are you also going to [fi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845059#action_12845059
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2312:
bq. IW flush could become thread
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845061#action_12845061
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2312:
bq. IW commitMerge calls docWrite
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845064#action_12845064
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2320:
This sounds good Shai!
This is t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2319.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.1
3.0.2
Thanks Kay Ka
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-2319:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> IndexReader # doCommit - typo nit about v3.0 in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2318:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2318.patch
Here the patch.
I removed almost all System.getProperty calls f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2318:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2318.patch
New patch, removed usage of DATA_DIR again.
All tests that simp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845077#action_12845077
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2320:
Ok, I'll update that part of CHANGES. The convers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845082#action_12845082
]
Toke Eskildsen commented on LUCENE-1990:
Thanks for rounding off, Michael. It's be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845097#action_12845097
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2318:
Patch looks good.
I see that you've documented T
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845098#action_12845098
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2318:
---
OK, I fixed the javadocs here! Thanks.
> A
Per the vote on general@ to merge committers, I've given Lucene and Solr
committers access to the two trunks.
-Grant
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-2320:
---
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New])
> Add MergePolicy to IndexWriterConfig
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-2320:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2320.patch
Patch with the proposed changes including:
* SetOnce (+ test)
* Deprec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-2318.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New])
Committed revis
I've merged JIRA permissions - let me know if I accidentally left anyone out.
Looking forward to the communities working more closely again!
(go Robert, go! ;-)
-Yonik
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Per the vote on general@ to merge committers, I've given Lucene and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845101#action_12845101
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2037:
---
Committed the assertion patch revision: 922
Given the notion of "one project, one set of committers", I think we should do
away with the notion of contrib committers for java-dev and just have everyone
be committers. Practically speaking, this would make all existing contrib
committers be core committers. I think the notion of contrib c
+1
Mike
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Given the notion of "one project, one set of committers", I think we should
> do away with the notion of contrib committers for java-dev and just have
> everyone be committers. Practically speaking, this would make all existin
+1
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Given the notion of "one project, one set of committers", I think we should
> do away with the notion of contrib committers for java-dev and just have
> everyone be committers. Practically speaking, this would make all existing
> c
+1
Michael
On 3/14/10 9:53 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Given the notion of "one project, one set of committers", I think we should do away with
the notion of contrib committers for java-dev and just have everyone be committers. Practically
speaking, this would make all existing contrib commi
use packed ints for the terms dict index
Key: LUCENE-2321
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2321
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Index
Affects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2321?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2321:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2321.patch
First cut -- it has some limitations though:
* Cann
This time a +1 without discuss :-)
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: [email protected]
> -Original Message-
> From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Grant
> Ingersoll
> Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2010 5:54 PM
> To: ja
Remove verbosity from tests and make configureable
--
Key: LUCENE-2322
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2322
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Sub-task
Reporter: U
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2322:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2322.patch
> Remove verbosity from tests and make configureable
> -
reorganize contrib modules
--
Key: LUCENE-2323
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2323
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: contrib/*
Reporter: Robert Muir
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845115#action_12845115
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2323:
That'd be great !
> reorganize contrib modules
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845118#action_12845118
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2310:
Spent more time pondering how to deprecate Fielda
On 2010-03-14 17:53, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Given the notion of "one project, one set of committers", I think we should do away with
the notion of contrib committers for java-dev and just have everyone be committers. Practically
speaking, this would make all existing contrib committers be core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845122#action_12845122
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2310:
How about if getFields() will return an Iterable?
: Subject: [DISCUSS] Do away with Contrib Committers and make core committers
+1
-Hoss
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845128#action_12845128
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2323:
+1!!
> reorganize contrib module
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845129#action_12845129
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2310:
Hi Shai,
{quote}
How about if getFields() will r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845130#action_12845130
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2310:
I can't think of why one would want to know how m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845135#action_12845135
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2310:
Haha, i whole heartedly agree with all your point
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845134#action_12845134
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2310:
Haha, i whole heartedly agree with all your point
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Male updated LUCENE-2310:
---
Comment: was deleted
(was: Haha, i whole heartedly agree with all your points.
One option instead o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul Elschot updated LUCENE-2322:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2322-surround.patch
This patch removes verbosity from the surround package. W
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul Elschot updated LUCENE-2322:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2322-surround.patch
One should first read the changed code and send the patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845141#action_12845141
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2322:
---
Thanks. I did not change the base classes o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845146#action_12845146
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-2322:
--
The removed code gives warnings to stdout for
On Mar 14, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> This time a +1 without discuss :-)
Yeah, but Uwe, the thread was DISCUSS, not VOTE! :-)
>
> -
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: [email protected]
>
>
>> -Original Message-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845149#action_12845149
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
Mike, rollback is pausing all threads
On 03/14/2010 06:37 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Mar 14, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
This time a +1 without discuss :-)
Yeah, but Uwe, the thread was DISCUSS, not VOTE! :-)
I had a whole spiel about earning merit, and some contrib committers
were made contrib co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845155#action_12845155
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2312:
---
Well, we need to keep our transactional sem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845157#action_12845157
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2312:
---
{quote}
Michael are you also going to [firs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845159#action_12845159
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2293:
---
bq. How about a new issue?
OK, will open o
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> On 03/14/2010 06:37 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 14, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> This time a +1 without discuss :-)
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, but Uwe, the thread was DISCUSS, not VOTE! :-)
>>
>
> I had a whole spiel a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845167#action_12845167
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2320:
-
Or, maybe, we should think of MergePoli
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845179#action_12845179
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
I got the basics of the term enum wor
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 06:41:26AM -0500, Michael McCandless wrote:
> I still don't think similarity should have any bearing during indexing.
Similarity has always, from day one, affected the contents of the index. This
idea that it should be totally divorced from indexing is, in fact, a very
si
Per thread DocumentsWriters that write their own private segments
-
Key: LUCENE-2324
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Im
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845190#action_12845190
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2293:
---
OK I opened LUCENE-2324. We can close this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845199#action_12845199
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2324:
---
Here is an interesting article about alloca
61 matches
Mail list logo
