GitHub user eolivelli opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/172
[SUREFIRE-1453] Allow to specify non existant classes as groups
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/eolivelli/maven
Github user eolivelli commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/172
@Tibor17 I have added some IT.
I found a bug in JUnit48TestCategoriesIT, actually
testCategoriesABForkAlways did not call ".forkAlways()"
I have added an IT test fo
Github user eolivelli commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/172
You are welcome!
---
Github user eolivelli closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/172
---
Github user eolivelli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/176#discussion_r173648002
--- Diff:
surefire-its/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/surefire/its/UnicodeTestNamesIT.java
---
@@ -62,14 +65,13 @@ public void
Github user eolivelli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/176#discussion_r173648023
--- Diff:
surefire-its/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/surefire/its/fixture/HelperAssertions.java
---
@@ -171,4 +172,9 @@ public static void
Github user eolivelli commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/177
I think that in "Branch Sources" you have to enable GitHub and work with
"iscover pull requests from forks" options.
It is a kind of Jenkins Job I have never used
Github user eolivelli commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/177
@Tibor17 I will be happy to pick up this issue and continue the work. I am
an user of the feature. I will continue the work as soon as I have time
---
Github user eolivelli commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/177
@Tibor17 I have tested this patch and I confirm that with this change the
error is the same as you are reporting, that is there is no more "Corrupted
stream" but only