gzm55 commented on pull request #33:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-wrapper/pull/33#issuecomment-1080281803
@slawekjaranowski can we allow [shellcheck
action](https://github.com/marketplace/actions/shellcheck)?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MWRAPPER-61?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17513198#comment-17513198
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on MWRAPPER-61:
gzm55 commented on pull request #33:
UR
Michael Pantel created MNGSITE-483:
--
Summary: https://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 not accessible
Key: MNGSITE-483
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNGSITE-483
Project: Maven Project Web Site
pzygielo opened a new pull request #123:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-javadoc-plugin/pull/123
[MJAVADOC-475](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-475?focusedCommentId=16516951&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-16516951):
>
Tibor17 commented on a change in pull request #499:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/499#discussion_r836219035
##
File path:
surefire-api/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/surefire/api/testset/TestListResolverTest.java
##
@@ -401,19 +406,6 @@ public void testInc
pzygielo commented on pull request #123:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/maven-javadoc-plugin/pull/123#issuecomment-1080404311
GH failures:
- windows/8/zulu:
```Caused by: org.eclipse.aether.resolution.ArtifactResolutionException:
Could not transfer artifact
org.apache.maven.shared:m
pzygielo commented on pull request #123:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/maven-javadoc-plugin/pull/123#issuecomment-1080407878
May I ask for review, please?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL abov
Tibor17 commented on a change in pull request #499:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/499#discussion_r836228298
##
File path:
surefire-providers/surefire-junit4/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/surefire/junit4/JUnit4Provider.java
##
@@ -432,7 +430,6 @@ private s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-2043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17513305#comment-17513305
]
Pavel Rybnicek commented on SUREFIRE-2043:
--
Yes, it does work with testng-eng
slachiewicz merged pull request #123:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-javadoc-plugin/pull/123
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
caiwei-ebay commented on pull request #158:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-resolver/pull/158#issuecomment-1080603190
@michael-o @cstamas @jebeaudet
Created a sample project to demonstrate the maven resolver slowness when
comes to resolve duplicate dependencies (same GAV) with diff
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17513351#comment-17513351
]
Hudson commented on MJAVADOC-475:
-
Build failed in Jenkins: Maven » Maven TLP » maven-j
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17513370#comment-17513370
]
Casper Roubos commented on SUREFIRE-1969:
-
Sorry for the late reply. I can ret
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17513382#comment-17513382
]
Issa Gorissen commented on MRESOLVER-216:
-
Hello [~michael-o] , is this suppos
pzygielo opened a new pull request #124:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-javadoc-plugin/pull/124
@slachiewicz - thanks for checking
- #123
Seems that maven 3.2.5, that
https://ci-maven.apache.org/job/Maven/job/maven-box/job/maven-javadoc-plugin/job/master/5/execution/node/195
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNGSITE-483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17513418#comment-17513418
]
Michael Osipov commented on MNGSITE-483:
Which POMs exactly?
> https://maven.ap
caiwei-ebay edited a comment on pull request #158:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-resolver/pull/158#issuecomment-1079874235
@michael-o @cstamas @jebeaudet @ibabiankou
As @cstamas pointed out, there is a slight but measurable performance
downgrade with the BFS approach.
mvn
slachiewicz merged pull request #124:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-javadoc-plugin/pull/124
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17513453#comment-17513453
]
Hudson commented on MJAVADOC-475:
-
Build succeeded in Jenkins: Maven » Maven TLP » mave
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNGSITE-483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17513466#comment-17513466
]
Michael Pantel commented on MNGSITE-483:
Take the Eclipse Platform poms.
Example
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNGSITE-483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Osipov closed MNGSITE-483.
--
Resolution: Invalid
>From an XML compliance perspective, this XML is invalid. The URI of
>noN
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHARED-1049?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Osipov moved MNG-7442 to MSHARED-1049:
--
Key: MSHARED-1049 (was: MNG-7442)
Affects Version/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHARED-1049?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17513491#comment-17513491
]
Michael Osipov commented on MSHARED-1049:
-
There is a similar error already rep
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-828?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17513529#comment-17513529
]
Hudson commented on MNG-828:
Build succeeded in Jenkins: Maven » Maven TLP » maven » MNG-7276 #5
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHARED-1049?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17513637#comment-17513637
]
Philipp Ottlinger commented on MSHARED-1049:
[~michael-o] thanks for the hi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tibor Digana reassigned SUREFIRE-1130:
--
Assignee: (was: Tibor Digana)
> Remove TODO and deprecated code in surefire 3.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tibor Digana updated SUREFIRE-1130:
---
Fix Version/s: 3.0
(was: 3.0.0-M6)
> Remove TODO and deprecated cod
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tibor Digana updated SUREFIRE-1654:
---
Fix Version/s: 3.0
(was: 3.0.0-M6)
> Remove deprecated parameter 'f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tibor Digana updated SUREFIRE-1170:
---
Fix Version/s: 3.0
(was: 3.0.0-M6)
> skiptTests=true is used by mav
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17513668#comment-17513668
]
Tibor Digana commented on SUREFIRE-1743:
[~andyRokit]
[~mpkorstanje]
I have a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17513669#comment-17513669
]
Tibor Digana commented on SUREFIRE-1710:
[~andyRokit]
[~mpkorstanje]
I have a
Tibor17 opened a new pull request #503:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/503
This is my old change from my shelf. Providing it open. The ITs are broken
and the impl should be fixed.
Implements
(skipAfterFailure)[https://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-surefire-plugin/e
Tibor17 commented on pull request #503:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/503#issuecomment-1081215746
@andyrokit
@mpkorstanje
This is the implementation for
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1743 and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1710 bu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tibor Digana updated SUREFIRE-1743:
---
External issue URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/503
> Allow custom liste
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17513683#comment-17513683
]
Tibor Digana commented on SUREFIRE-1743:
This is the link with a PR https://gi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17513684#comment-17513684
]
Tibor Digana commented on SUREFIRE-1710:
This is the link with a PR https://gi
Tibor17 commented on pull request #503:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/503#issuecomment-1081219150
The class `FailFastJUnit5IT` should be renamed...
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tibor Digana updated SUREFIRE-1743:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0.0-M6)
> Allow custom listeners to request stop
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tibor Digana updated SUREFIRE-1708:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0.0-M6)
> skipAfterFailureCount should be coherent across multi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tibor Digana reassigned SUREFIRE-1710:
--
Assignee: Tibor Digana
> skipAfterFailureCount in JUnit5 provider
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tibor Digana updated SUREFIRE-1710:
---
Fix Version/s: 3.0.0-M7
(was: 3.0.0-M6)
> skipAfterFailureCount in
mpkorstanje commented on pull request #503:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/503#issuecomment-1081230185
Cheers. I don't mind taking a look but at a glance this will only work with
JUnit Jupiter rather then every TestEngine on the JUnit Platform.
It won't work for e
mpkorstanje edited a comment on pull request #503:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/503#issuecomment-1081230185
Cheers. I don't mind taking a look but at a glance this will only work with
JUnit Jupiter rather then every TestEngine on the JUnit Platform. The current
implem
mpkorstanje commented on pull request #503:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/503#issuecomment-1081234664
Overall I think it would be more effective to first resolve
https://github.com/junit-team/junit5/issues/1880 before trying to make it work
in surefire.
--
This is a
Tibor Digana created SUREFIRE-2050:
--
Summary: Remove deprecated subinterfaces of ConcurrentRunListener
after SUREFIRE-1661, SUREFIRE-1795, SUREFIRE-1643
Key: SUREFIRE-2050
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/brow
Tibor17 commented on pull request #503:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/503#issuecomment-1081266257
Yes, it would be worth to have the a fix in [JUnit5
issue](https://github.com/junit-team/junit5/issues/1880) I reported.
Unfortunately, the JUnit5 team does not care :-)
Tibor17 edited a comment on pull request #503:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/503#issuecomment-1081266257
Yes, it would be worth to have the fix in [JUnit5
issue](https://github.com/junit-team/junit5/issues/1880) I reported.
Unfortunately, the JUnit5 team does not car
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-2050?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tibor Digana updated SUREFIRE-2050:
---
Summary: Remove deprecated subclasses of ConcurrentRunListener after
SUREFIRE-1661, SUREFI
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17513735#comment-17513735
]
Tibor Digana commented on SUREFIRE-1814:
Yes, it is really reproducible proble
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-2050?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tibor Digana updated SUREFIRE-2050:
---
Description: After the issues SUREFIRE-1661, SUREFIRE-1795, SUREFIRE-1643
are resolved and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tibor Digana updated SUREFIRE-1814:
---
Fix Version/s: 3.0.0-M7
(was: 3.0.0-M6)
> Listener System.out.print
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tibor Digana updated SUREFIRE-1929:
---
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
> forkedProcessTimeoutInSeconds is controlled by the plugin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tibor Digana updated SUREFIRE-1929:
---
Fix Version/s: 3.0.0-M7
(was: 3.0.0-M6)
> forkedProcessTimeoutInSec
Tibor17 edited a comment on pull request #503:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/503#issuecomment-1081266257
Yes, it would be worth to have the fix of [JUnit5
issue](https://github.com/junit-team/junit5/issues/1880) I reported.
Unfortunately, the JUnit5 team does not car
Tibor17 commented on pull request #502:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/502#issuecomment-1081284797
@slawekjaranowski
IMHO, he could not find the business logic.
We use `SmartStackTraceParser` everywhere except the JUnit3 provider.
Currently the logic is located
Tibor17 edited a comment on pull request #502:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/502#issuecomment-1081284797
@slawekjaranowski
IMHO, he could not find the business logic.
We use `SmartStackTraceParser` everywhere except the JUnit3 provider.
Currently the logic is l
Tibor17 edited a comment on pull request #502:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/502#issuecomment-1081284797
@slawekjaranowski
I think I took over the description by some user.
IMHO, the user could not find the business logic. Now we use
`SmartStackTraceParser` every
Tibor17 edited a comment on pull request #502:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/502#issuecomment-1081284797
@slawekjaranowski
I think I took over the description by some user.
IMHO, the user could not find the business logic. Now we use
`SmartStackTraceParser` every
Tibor17 edited a comment on pull request #502:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/502#issuecomment-1081284797
@slawekjaranowski
I think I took over the description by some user.
Now we use `SmartStackTraceParser` everywhere except the JUnit3 provider.
Currently the lo
Tibor17 edited a comment on pull request #502:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/502#issuecomment-1081284797
@slawekjaranowski
I think I took over the description by some user.
Now we use `SmartStackTraceParser` everywhere except the JUnit3 provider.
Currently, the l
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tibor Digana updated SUREFIRE-1709:
---
Summary: Fire events when Provider execution is started and finished (was:
re-run should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tibor Digana updated SUREFIRE-1709:
---
Description:
Currently the XML reporter creates the report for a normal run. Then the same
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tibor Digana updated SUREFIRE-1709:
---
Description:
Currently the XML reporter creates the report for a normal run. Then the same
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tibor Digana updated SUREFIRE-1709:
---
Description:
Currently the XML reporter creates the report for a normal run. Then the same
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tibor Digana updated SUREFIRE-1709:
---
Description:
Currently the XML reporter creates the report for a normal run. Then the same
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tibor Digana updated SUREFIRE-1814:
---
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
> Listener System.out.printf is written as multiple lines
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-2048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17513755#comment-17513755
]
Tibor Digana commented on SUREFIRE-2048:
See the original PR
https://github.co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tibor Digana updated SUREFIRE-1560:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0)
> Rework SUREFIRE-1535. Use only FORKTESTSET and split Suref
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tibor Digana closed SUREFIRE-1560.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
> Rework SUREFIRE-1535. Use only FORKTESTSET and split SurefireProvide
Tibor17 commented on pull request #500:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/500#issuecomment-1081314829
@slawekjaranowski
If we are so close to cut a new release, we should push this change and we
can continue with the discussion and refactoring or joining the POMs in one
Tibor17 commented on pull request #502:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/502#issuecomment-1081315961
@slawekjaranowski
I have cleaned up the [release
backlog](https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20SUREFIRE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.0.0-M6%20ORDE
Tibor17 edited a comment on pull request #502:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/502#issuecomment-1081315961
@slawekjaranowski
I have cleaned up the [release
backlog](https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20SUREFIRE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.0.0-M6
mpkorstanje commented on pull request #503:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/503#issuecomment-1081322666
I believe the JUnit team uses community engagement as a measure of
importance and interest.
Now it seems the conversation never moved on after the brainstorming.
laeubi commented on pull request #695:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/695#issuecomment-1081326893
@michael-o just wondering inf we can proceed here? If its fine for 3.8.x
I'll prepare PRs for 2.9.x and 4.x as well ... I also wonder if it would be
suitable to release a 3.8.6 vers
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request #109:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-invoker-plugin/pull/109
Bumps [mockito-core](https://github.com/mockito/mockito) from 4.3.1 to 4.4.0.
Release notes
Sourced from https://github.com/mockito/mockito/releases";>mockito-core's
releas
slawekjaranowski commented on pull request #500:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/500#issuecomment-1081403804
@Tibor17
Ok, I removed additional test, and use only existing.
I think that exclusions in most of time it is workaround for problem in
target project.
76 matches
Mail list logo
