[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WAGON-369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Olivier Lamy closed WAGON-369.
--
Resolution: Fixed
even if redirect on get worked fine I have added unit test.
> Maven deploy
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WAGON-369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=294140#comment-294140
]
James Baldassari commented on WAGON-369:
Thanks very much! I'll try to find some time to te
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WAGON-369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=294120#comment-294120
]
Olivier Lamy commented on WAGON-369:
feel free to make some tests with maven 3.0.5-SNAPSHOT avai
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WAGON-369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=294114#comment-294114
]
Olivier Lamy commented on WAGON-369:
fixed for PUT. I will now have a look to write unit test fo
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WAGON-369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Olivier Lamy updated WAGON-369:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.3
> Maven deploy plugin doesn't follow HTTP 302 redirects
> --
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WAGON-369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=294058#comment-294058
]
Olivier Lamy commented on WAGON-369:
But as usual nobody implements specs :-) as 302 is somethin
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WAGON-369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=294057#comment-294057
]
James Baldassari commented on WAGON-369:
That's interesting. I guess reading the spec is ne
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WAGON-369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=294053#comment-294053
]
Olivier Lamy commented on WAGON-369:
I agree there is possible issues with redirect. I'm having
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WAGON-369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=294052#comment-294052
]
James Baldassari commented on WAGON-369:
To address your question regarding MRELEASE-719, th
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WAGON-369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=294051#comment-294051
]
James Baldassari commented on WAGON-369:
No, the artifact did not exist prior to the deploy.
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WAGON-369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=294046#comment-294046
]
Robert Scholte commented on WAGON-369:
--
The success of the tagging could be a false positive. T
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WAGON-369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=294040#comment-294040
]
James Baldassari commented on WAGON-369:
This problem happens during a mvn release, so we're
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WAGON-369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=294034#comment-294034
]
Robert Scholte commented on WAGON-369:
--
My guess would be: somebody already deployed an artifac
[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WAGON-369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Olivier Lamy moved MDEPLOY-148 to WAGON-369:
Affects Version/s: (was: 2.7)
2.2
Key
14 matches
Mail list logo
