gnodet commented on PR #1594:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1594#issuecomment-2208381221
> > > Big question is now: Should the components in m-site-p rewritten to
make things right? (for both Maven 3 and 4)
> >
> >
> > Doxia 2.x can be used on Maven 3, right ? So if we
gnodet commented on PR #1594:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1594#issuecomment-2208330980
> > Big question is now: Should the components in m-site-p rewritten to make
things right? (for both Maven 3 and 4)
>
> Doxia 2.x can be used on Maven 3, right ? So if we fix it there,
gnodet commented on PR #1594:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1594#issuecomment-2208320725
> Big question is now: Should the components in m-site-p rewritten to make
things right? (for both Maven 3 and 4)
Doxia 2.x can be used on Maven 3, right ? So if we fix it there, it ma
michael-o commented on PR #1594:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1594#issuecomment-2208310063
Big question is now: Should the components in m-site-p rewritten to make
things right? (for both Maven 3 and 4)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond t
gnodet opened a new pull request, #1594:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1594
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
