cstamas merged PR #1357:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1357
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@maven.apache.
cstamas commented on PR #1357:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1357#issuecomment-1887094814
> I mean you build the project with maven 4, upload to central, and a maven
3 projects depends on it.
Yes, in that case they may be differences. BUT, since we talk about _two
distinc
gnodet commented on PR #1357:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1357#issuecomment-1887066792
> > However, I have no idea what the impact is if one builds a project with
the _transitive_ dependency manager, but uses it with the _classic_ one in
Maven 3. Could that break the consumer
cstamas commented on PR #1357:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1357#issuecomment-1886835845
Yes, we have separate issue for that
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1373
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to Git
gnodet commented on code in PR #1357:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1357#discussion_r1448599723
##
pom.xml:
##
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ under the License.
1.26
1.0.0
4.0.1
-2.0.0-alpha-5
+2.0.0-alpha-6
Review Comment:
This should be in a separat
cstamas commented on PR #1357:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1357#issuecomment-1880869332
> However, I have no idea what the impact is if one builds a project with
the _transitive_ dependency manager, but uses it with the _classic_ one in
Maven 3. Could that break the consumer s
gnodet commented on PR #1357:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1357#issuecomment-1865512751
> Hmm, still thinking a bit out loud but at some point it was discussed that
the consumed pom would be "cleaned for central" (flatten maven plugin like etc)
to ensure the consumers see it as
rmannibucau commented on PR #1357:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1357#issuecomment-1864990604
Hmm, still thinking a bit out loud but at some point it was discussed that
the consumed pom would be "cleaned for central" (flatten maven plugin like etc)
to ensure the consumers see it
