[GitHub] [maven-resolver] cstamas commented on pull request #144: Use BFS approach

2022-02-17 Thread GitBox
cstamas commented on pull request #144: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-resolver/pull/144#issuecomment-1042931791 Run Maven ITs (57a1cf81bb87fbf46bd8189558a10633fe8bf65e) against maven using resolver-1.8.0-SNAPSHOT-BFS (built as above): aside those ITs known to fail due transport-http

[GitHub] [maven-resolver] cstamas commented on pull request #144: Use BFS approach

2022-02-17 Thread GitBox
cstamas commented on pull request #144: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-resolver/pull/144#issuecomment-1042904322 IMHO, this looks good -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the s

[GitHub] [maven-resolver] cstamas commented on pull request #144: Use BFS approach

2022-02-17 Thread GitBox
cstamas commented on pull request #144: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-resolver/pull/144#issuecomment-1042897657 Tested locally. This is what I did (used Java 11 Temurin for all, on Linux): * built and installed locally maven master branch (0be5e406d78062b56b32644fefce2642f5eab650)

[GitHub] [maven-resolver] cstamas commented on pull request #144: Use BFS approach

2022-01-31 Thread GitBox
cstamas commented on pull request #144: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-resolver/pull/144#issuecomment-1026093695 pls incorporate latest master changes (whether rebase+squash+force push or just merge) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the mes