michael-o commented on a change in pull request #598:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/598#discussion_r730594544
##
File path: maven-core/src/main/mdo/cache-domain.mdo
##
@@ -0,0 +1,296 @@
+
mthmulders commented on a change in pull request #598:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/598#discussion_r730578718
##
File path: maven-core/src/main/mdo/cache-domain.mdo
##
@@ -0,0 +1,296 @@
+
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request #24:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-invoker/pull/24
Bumps [actions/checkout](https://github.com/actions/checkout) from 2.3.4 to
2.3.5.
Release notes
Sourced from https://github.com/actions/checkout/releases";>actions/checkout's
rele
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request #52:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-script-interpreter/pull/52
Bumps [actions/checkout](https://github.com/actions/checkout) from 2.3.4 to
2.3.5.
Release notes
Sourced from https://github.com/actions/checkout/releases";>actions/check
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request #102:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-javadoc-plugin/pull/102
Bumps [actions/checkout](https://github.com/actions/checkout) from 2.3.4 to
2.3.5.
Release notes
Sourced from https://github.com/actions/checkout/releases";>actions/checkou
michael-o commented on pull request #128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-scm/pull/128#issuecomment-945188301
`grep` tells me some changes is till missing
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL a
hboutemy commented on pull request #597:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/597#issuecomment-945163562
without PR, no review: I had to create a PR to create life :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and u
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-7231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17429736#comment-17429736
]
Hudson commented on MNG-7231:
-
Build unstable in Jenkins: Maven » Maven TLP » maven » MNG-7129
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17429738#comment-17429738
]
Hudson commented on MNG-6914:
-
Build unstable in Jenkins: Maven » Maven TLP » maven » MNG-7129
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-7230?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17429735#comment-17429735
]
Hudson commented on MNG-7230:
-
Build unstable in Jenkins: Maven » Maven TLP » maven » MNG-7129
michael-o commented on pull request #597:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/597#issuecomment-945160691
I thought that incremental changes would happen in the branch only. So a
branch from branch. This diff looks huge to me.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Serv
hboutemy commented on pull request #597:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/597#issuecomment-945160225
step by step
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
michael-o commented on pull request #597:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/597#issuecomment-945160128
Why into 3.8.x? Shouldn't this be Maven 4 for now?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCM-969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Osipov reassigned SCM-969:
--
Assignee: Michael Osipov
> Remove all deprecated providers
> ---
>
>
hboutemy opened a new pull request #597:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/597
after initial merge of Deutsche Bank donation to MNG-7129 branch #526, let's
rework the code to better match Maven codebase
For example switching from jaxb2 to Modello
--
This is an automated me
rmannibucau commented on pull request #521:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/521#issuecomment-945140574
I would agree with #476 but didn't get much time to test but if you are
confident it is better than any thread local solution anyway so happy to go
with it too.
--
This is an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MDEP-753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17429693#comment-17429693
]
Elliotte Rusty Harold commented on MDEP-753:
Oops, confused 2020 and 2021 The f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MDEP-753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Elliotte Rusty Harold reopened MDEP-753:
My mistake. I fixed the root of the problem in
https://github.com/apache/maven-dependenc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MDEP-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Elliotte Rusty Harold resolved MDEP-773.
Resolution: Duplicate
dupe of MDEP-753
> Getting Warning : Non-test scoped test only
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MDEP-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Elliotte Rusty Harold closed MDEP-773.
--
> Getting Warning : Non-test scoped test only dependencies found
> --
michael-o edited a comment on pull request #521:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/521#issuecomment-945107348
>
>
> I personally would prefer #476 over my PR #578 because it seems to be more
efficient and catches more cases. But I guess that #476 is a bit much of a
global c
michael-o edited a comment on pull request #521:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/521#issuecomment-945107348
>
>
> I personally would prefer #476 over my PR #578 because it seems to be more
efficient and catches more cases. But I guess that #476 is a bit much of a
global c
michael-o commented on pull request #521:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/521#issuecomment-945107348
>
>
> I personally would prefer #476 over my PR #578 because it seems to be more
efficient and catches more cases. But I guess that #476 is a bit much of a
global change f
famod commented on pull request #521:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/521#issuecomment-945106390
I personally would prefer #476 over my PR #578 because it seems to be more
efficient and catches more cases.
But I guess that #476 is a bit much of a global change for a 3.8.x? Ther
rmannibucau commented on pull request #521:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/521#issuecomment-945103277
Yes
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To uns
michael-o commented on pull request #521:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/521#issuecomment-945100645
>
>
> 578 gets backs to an usable state for most case with a fully functional
one with 1 thread so i would merge it yes.
And that superseded this PR for you?
--
T
rmannibucau commented on pull request #521:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/521#issuecomment-945100099
578 gets backs to an usable state for most case with a fully functional one
with 1 thread so i would merge it yes.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
michael-o merged pull request #121:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-integration-testing/pull/121
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-ma
michael-o merged pull request #596:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/596
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr.
michael-o commented on pull request #521:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/521#issuecomment-945088039
>
>
> InheritableThreadLocal works only when subclassloader tree is controlled
and can accept its value leakage. It is the case for jetty but not for all mojo
so iy is not
rmannibucau commented on pull request #521:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/521#issuecomment-945087278
InheritableThreadLocal works only when subclassloader tree is controlled and
can accept its value leakage. It is the case for jetty but not for all mojo so
iy is not a good solu
michael-o commented on a change in pull request #121:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/maven-integration-testing/pull/121#discussion_r730387504
##
File path:
core-it-suite/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/it/MavenITmng5760ResumeFeatureTest.java
##
@@ -72,8 +72,8 @@ public void te
slawekjaranowski commented on pull request #44:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-plugin-tools/pull/44#issuecomment-945081349
@olamy, @cstamas, @gnodet
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
michael-o opened a new pull request #121:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-integration-testing/pull/121
As discussed some months ago.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the spec
michael-o opened a new pull request #596:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/596
As discussed some months ago.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To un
slawekjaranowski commented on pull request #43:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-plugin-tools/pull/43#issuecomment-945080554
Please look: @cstamas , @rfscholte @aheritier @khmarbaise
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
slawekjaranowski commented on pull request #170:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/maven-dependency-plugin/pull/170#issuecomment-945069504
@olamy please look ... is it time to propagate to another repos ... this
issue `MDEP-768` was be at the beginning of trip
--
This is an automated messa
michael-o commented on pull request #521:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/521#issuecomment-945068707
>
>
> @michael-o yup sure do it. #578 just introduce a very high level
(unmaintainable? really needed?) complexity. There is still no real proof this
simple change is bad.
slawekjaranowski opened a new pull request #170:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-dependency-plugin/pull/170
Following this checklist to help us incorporate your
contribution quickly and easily:
- [x] Make sure there is a [JIRA
issue](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MD
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MDEP-752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17429659#comment-17429659
]
Slawomir Jaranowski commented on MDEP-752:
--
PR recreated
> skip dependency analyz
slawekjaranowski opened a new pull request #169:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-dependency-plugin/pull/169
By default pom and ear packaging are ignored from analyzing.
Following this checklist to help us incorporate your
contribution quickly and easily:
- [x] Make su
41 matches
Mail list logo
