[jira] [Commented] (MNG-6969) mvn clean install fails for helloworld projects with java-11

2020-07-26 Thread Dennis Lundberg (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17165475#comment-17165475 ] Dennis Lundberg commented on MNG-6969: -- Hi, If you target Java 9 or higher you might

[jira] [Commented] (MASFRES-37) Mvn -v in cmd shows Syntax of the command is incorrect

2020-07-26 Thread Dennis Lundberg (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MASFRES-37?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17165470#comment-17165470 ] Dennis Lundberg commented on MASFRES-37: Hi, we need more information to debug yo

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1788) Unhandled native logs in SurefireForkChannel

2020-07-26 Thread Alexander Kriegisch (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17165468#comment-17165468 ] Alexander Kriegisch commented on SUREFIRE-1788: --- Hm, I consider myself a

[jira] [Updated] (MPOM-255) Enforce local property "project.build.outputTimestamp" for reproducible builds

2020-07-26 Thread Konrad Windszus (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPOM-255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Konrad Windszus updated MPOM-255: - Description: In case the release's root pom.xml doesn't overwrite  "project.build.outputTimestamp"

[jira] [Updated] (MPOM-255) Enforce local property "project.build.outputTimestamp" for reproducible builds

2020-07-26 Thread Konrad Windszus (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPOM-255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Konrad Windszus updated MPOM-255: - Summary: Enforce local property "project.build.outputTimestamp" for reproducible builds (was: Enfo

[jira] [Updated] (MPOM-255) Enforce property "project.build.outputTimestamp" for reproducible builds

2020-07-26 Thread Konrad Windszus (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPOM-255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Konrad Windszus updated MPOM-255: - Description: An enforcer rule should be added to require a property  "project.build.outputTimestamp

[jira] [Updated] (MPOM-255) Enforce property "project.build.outputTimestamp" for reproducible builds

2020-07-26 Thread Konrad Windszus (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPOM-255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Konrad Windszus updated MPOM-255: - Description: An enforcer rule should be added to require a property  "project.build.outputTimestamp

[jira] [Created] (MPOM-255) Enforce property "project.build.outputTimestamp" for reproducible builds

2020-07-26 Thread Konrad Windszus (Jira)
Konrad Windszus created MPOM-255: Summary: Enforce property "project.build.outputTimestamp" for reproducible builds Key: MPOM-255 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPOM-255 Project: Maven POM

[jira] [Created] (MASFRES-37) Mvn -v in cmd shows Syntax of the command is incorrect

2020-07-26 Thread vignesh GOVINDARAJ (Jira)
vignesh GOVINDARAJ created MASFRES-37: - Summary: Mvn -v in cmd shows Syntax of the command is incorrect Key: MASFRES-37 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MASFRES-37 Project: Apache Maven

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SUREFIRE-1788) Unhandled native logs in SurefireForkChannel

2020-07-26 Thread Tibor Digana (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17165268#comment-17165268 ] Tibor Digana edited comment on SUREFIRE-1788 at 7/26/20, 4:49 PM: --

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1788) Unhandled native logs in SurefireForkChannel

2020-07-26 Thread Tibor Digana (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17165268#comment-17165268 ] Tibor Digana commented on SUREFIRE-1788: [~kriegaex] It was my hint for you. S

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SUREFIRE-1788) Unhandled native logs in SurefireForkChannel

2020-07-26 Thread Alexander Kriegisch (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17165247#comment-17165247 ] Alexander Kriegisch edited comment on SUREFIRE-1788 at 7/26/20, 3:25 PM: ---

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1788) Unhandled native logs in SurefireForkChannel

2020-07-26 Thread Alexander Kriegisch (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17165247#comment-17165247 ] Alexander Kriegisch commented on SUREFIRE-1788: --- Just to clarify and bec

[GitHub] [maven-javadoc-plugin] anthonyvdotbe commented on pull request #50: [MJAVADOC-623] - Provide a fallback for api-element-list

2020-07-26 Thread GitBox
anthonyvdotbe commented on pull request #50: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-javadoc-plugin/pull/50#issuecomment-664001473 Closing in favor of #51 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to

[GitHub] [maven-javadoc-plugin] anthonyvdotbe closed pull request #50: [MJAVADOC-623] - Provide a fallback for api-element-list

2020-07-26 Thread GitBox
anthonyvdotbe closed pull request #50: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-javadoc-plugin/pull/50 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL

[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1788) Unhandled native logs in SurefireForkChannel

2020-07-26 Thread Tibor Digana (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17165246#comment-17165246 ] Tibor Digana commented on SUREFIRE-1788: [~kriegaex] I have found the root cau

[GitHub] [maven-javadoc-plugin] anthonyvdotbe commented on a change in pull request #51: [MJAVADOC-623] - Fall back to downloading element-list

2020-07-26 Thread GitBox
anthonyvdotbe commented on a change in pull request #51: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-javadoc-plugin/pull/51#discussion_r460534974 ## File path: src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/javadoc/AbstractJavadocMojo.java ## @@ -6407,20 +6410,41 @@ else if ( javaApiversion

[GitHub] [maven-javadoc-plugin] eolivelli commented on a change in pull request #51: [MJAVADOC-623] - Fall back to downloading element-list

2020-07-26 Thread GitBox
eolivelli commented on a change in pull request #51: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-javadoc-plugin/pull/51#discussion_r460533503 ## File path: src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/javadoc/AbstractJavadocMojo.java ## @@ -6407,20 +6410,41 @@ else if ( javaApiversion.asM

[jira] [Commented] (MJAVADOC-623) [ERROR] Error fetching link: %{project.basedir}/target/javadoc-bundle-options. Ignored it.

2020-07-26 Thread Anthony Vanelverdinghe (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17165213#comment-17165213 ] Anthony Vanelverdinghe commented on MJAVADOC-623: - Ok, I've opened an [

[GitHub] [maven-javadoc-plugin] anthonyvdotbe opened a new pull request #51: [MJAVADOC-623] - Fall back to downloading element-list

2020-07-26 Thread GitBox
anthonyvdotbe opened a new pull request #51: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-javadoc-plugin/pull/51 This allows to build with a JDK for which the plugin does not contain a `java-api-element-list-XX` file yet. ## what When building with a JDK version XX, for which the plugin d

[jira] [Updated] (MENFORCER-357) RequirePluginVersions not recognizing versions-from-properties

2020-07-26 Thread Robert Scholte (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MENFORCER-357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Scholte updated MENFORCER-357: - Description: Fails (plugin version as a property applied in pluginManagement): {code:x

[GitHub] [maven-pmd-plugin] pzygielo closed pull request #26: Revert upgrade to 6.26

2020-07-26 Thread GitBox
pzygielo closed pull request #26: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-pmd-plugin/pull/26 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to

[GitHub] [maven-pmd-plugin] pzygielo commented on pull request #26: Revert upgrade to 6.26

2020-07-26 Thread GitBox
pzygielo commented on pull request #26: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-pmd-plugin/pull/26#issuecomment-663963914 Closing - as revert - should it be decided to do so - can be performed directly on GH without additional commits.

[GitHub] [maven-pmd-plugin] pzygielo commented on pull request #26: Revert upgrade to 6.26

2020-07-26 Thread GitBox
pzygielo commented on pull request #26: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-pmd-plugin/pull/26#issuecomment-663963733 @adangel thanks for checking > I'm not sure, if adding a IT in m-pmd-p for a bug in PMD makes sense. Now I see it. You're right - such IT doesn't fit here. -

[jira] [Closed] (MENFORCER-348) add a graalvm enforcer rule

2020-07-26 Thread Robert Scholte (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MENFORCER-348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Scholte closed MENFORCER-348. Assignee: Robert Scholte Resolution: Won't Fix The rules we maintain should be sco

[jira] [Closed] (MENFORCER-355) make build Reproducible

2020-07-26 Thread Robert Scholte (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MENFORCER-355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Scholte closed MENFORCER-355. Resolution: Fixed Fixed in [036150ed585261fa600da1bbd124079a7d1cda17|https://gitbox.apa

[jira] [Commented] (MJAVADOC-623) [ERROR] Error fetching link: %{project.basedir}/target/javadoc-bundle-options. Ignored it.

2020-07-26 Thread Robert Scholte (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17165189#comment-17165189 ] Robert Scholte commented on MJAVADOC-623: - I understand the advantages, but the

[GitHub] [maven-pmd-plugin] adangel commented on pull request #26: Revert upgrade to 6.26

2020-07-26 Thread GitBox
adangel commented on pull request #26: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-pmd-plugin/pull/26#issuecomment-663960783 If we were to release m-pmd-p, I'd agree, that this is a blocker and needs to be reverted. I'm not sure, if adding a IT in m-pmd-p for a bug in PMD makes sense. The test