[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARCHETYPE-573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16963003#comment-16963003
]
Anton edited comment on ARCHETYPE-573 at 10/31/19 5:46 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARCHETYPE-573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16963003#comment-16963003
]
Anton edited comment on ARCHETYPE-573 at 10/31/19 5:33 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARCHETYPE-573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16963003#comment-16963003
]
Anton edited comment on ARCHETYPE-573 at 10/31/19 5:32 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WAGON-573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Osipov reassigned WAGON-573:
Assignee: Michael Osipov
> EntityUtils.consumeQuietly() never called on non-2xx status code
michael-o opened a new pull request #59: [WAGON-573]
EntityUtils.consumeQuietly() never called on non-2xx stat…
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-wagon/pull/59
…us codes
@ok2c Please have a look whether this makes sense to properly clean up
resources.
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WAGON-573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Osipov updated WAGON-573:
-
Summary: EntityUtils.consumeQuietly() never called on non-2xx status codes
(was: EntityUtils.cons
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WAGON-573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Osipov updated WAGON-573:
-
Summary: EntityUtils.consumeQuietly() never called on non-2xx cases (was:
EntityUtils.consumeQuet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WAGON-573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Osipov updated WAGON-573:
-
Summary: EntityUtils.consumeQuetly() never called on non-2xx cases (was:
EntityUtils.consume() ne
michael-o commented on a change in pull request #297: MNG-6771 Fix license
issues on binary distribution
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/297#discussion_r340880466
##
File path: apache-maven/src/main/appended-resources/META-INF/LICENSE.vm
##
@@ -22,21 +22,18 @@ Ap
hboutemy commented on a change in pull request #297: MNG-6771 Fix license
issues on binary distribution
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/297#discussion_r340879889
##
File path: apache-maven/src/main/appended-resources/META-INF/LICENSE.vm
##
@@ -22,21 +22,18 @@ Apa
hboutemy commented on a change in pull request #297: MNG-6771 Fix license
issues on binary distribution
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/297#discussion_r340880178
##
File path: apache-maven/src/main/assembly/component.xml
##
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ under the License.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1631?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16963406#comment-16963406
]
Tibor Digana commented on SUREFIRE-1631:
we are reporting some errors in the d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1631?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16963403#comment-16963403
]
Tibor Digana commented on SUREFIRE-1631:
Can you try with the development vers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1631?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16963370#comment-16963370
]
Aaron Digulla commented on SUREFIRE-1631:
-
Just some notes:
# My test doesn't
Tibor17 commented on issue #245: Surefire-1584: Add option to rerun failing
tests for JUnit5
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/245#issuecomment-547965436
@Col-E @Seijan
IMO the problem would be in the filter. Maybe the name of test method is
`myTest[0]` instead of `my
Tibor17 commented on issue #245: Surefire-1584: Add option to rerun failing
tests for JUnit5
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/245#issuecomment-547962196
@Seijan
I agree with you that parameterized tests are very important.
Would you write an integration test in our
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WAGON-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16963114#comment-16963114
]
Michael Osipov edited comment on WAGON-568 at 10/30/19 3:22 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WAGON-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16963114#comment-16963114
]
Michael Osipov edited comment on WAGON-568 at 10/30/19 3:22 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WAGON-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16963114#comment-16963114
]
Michael Osipov commented on WAGON-568:
--
My bad, it should have been BAIS. I cannot fu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARCHETYPE-573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16963003#comment-16963003
]
Anton commented on ARCHETYPE-573:
--
Please up the priority of this bug. Very annoying
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARCHETYPE-573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16963003#comment-16963003
]
Anton edited comment on ARCHETYPE-573 at 10/30/19 1:02 PM:
Seijan commented on issue #245: Surefire-1584: Add option to rerun failing
tests for JUnit5
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/245#issuecomment-547872792
Did you check how this feature works with parameterized tests from JUnit5? I
know it's an experimental feature, but we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WAGON-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16962847#comment-16962847
]
Oleg Kalnichevski commented on WAGON-568:
-
[~michael-o] BAOS or BAIS? I do not see
23 matches
Mail list logo