[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MDEP-579?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16904864#comment-16904864
]
Kent Granström commented on MDEP-579:
-
Hi [~pmoerenhout]
I have now cloned your branch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-7?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16904845#comment-16904845
]
Hudson commented on MRESOLVER-7:
Build succeeded in Jenkins: Maven TLP » maven-resolver
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16904806#comment-16904806
]
Clark Perkins commented on SUREFIRE-1553:
-
Also I just looked at the TEST-com.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16904805#comment-16904805
]
Clark Perkins commented on SUREFIRE-1553:
-
[~tibordigana]
I just pulled down
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPLUGINTESTING-63?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16904745#comment-16904745
]
Robert Scholte commented on MPLUGINTESTING-63:
--
In that case we shoul
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPLUGINTESTING-63?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16904742#comment-16904742
]
Samael Bate commented on MPLUGINTESTING-63:
---
seems we cannot get the goa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16904737#comment-16904737
]
Tibor Digana commented on SUREFIRE-1553:
[~skrser]
[~clarkperkins]
This projec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tibor Digana reassigned SUREFIRE-1553:
--
Assignee: Tibor Digana
> @Unroll forces usage of JUnit Vintage
> --
SingingBush commented on issue #8: MPLUGINTESTING-61 MPLUGINTESTING-62 target
JDK 7 and maven 3.6.0
URL:
https://github.com/apache/maven-plugin-testing/pull/8#issuecomment-520254051
@rfscholte I've created
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPLUGINTESTING-63 for that. My local
changes
Samael Bate created MPLUGINTESTING-63:
-
Summary: AbstractMojoTestCase should return correct type
Key: MPLUGINTESTING-63
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPLUGINTESTING-63
Project: Maven P
rfscholte commented on issue #8: MPLUGINTESTING-61 MPLUGINTESTING-62 target JDK
7 and maven 3.6.0
URL:
https://github.com/apache/maven-plugin-testing/pull/8#issuecomment-520251983
> protected T lookupMojo( String goal, String pluginPom,
Class type)
This is just moving the cast to
SingingBush commented on issue #8: MPLUGINTESTING-61 MPLUGINTESTING-62 target
JDK 7 and maven 3.6.0
URL:
https://github.com/apache/maven-plugin-testing/pull/8#issuecomment-520249073
done
This is an automated message from the
Samael Bate created MPLUGINTESTING-62:
-
Summary: target maven 3.6.0 API
Key: MPLUGINTESTING-62
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPLUGINTESTING-62
Project: Maven Plugin Testing
I
Tibor17 commented on issue #8: target Java 8 and maven 3.6.0
URL:
https://github.com/apache/maven-plugin-testing/pull/8#issuecomment-520247649
@SingingBush
regarding this PR, there are rules to first issue a new Jira tickets, see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPLUGINTESTING
Tibor17 commented on issue #8: target Java 8 and maven 3.6.0
URL:
https://github.com/apache/maven-plugin-testing/pull/8#issuecomment-520247443
@SingingBush
Let's separate the purpose of
https://github.com/apache/maven-plugin-testing/pull/8#issuecomment-520244222 in
a new PR.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPOM-222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16904703#comment-16904703
]
Robert Scholte commented on MPOM-222:
-
Java 7 makes sense, it is also the lowest possib
SingingBush commented on issue #8: target Java 8 and maven 3.6.0
URL:
https://github.com/apache/maven-plugin-testing/pull/8#issuecomment-520244222
Yes the update is just so that this plugin can work with newer code bases
not because of requirements in the code. I'm currently working on a m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPOM-222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16904698#comment-16904698
]
Michael Osipov commented on MPOM-222:
-
Java 7 would be reasonable for now. [~rfscholte]
rfscholte commented on issue #8: target Java 8 and maven 3.6.0
URL:
https://github.com/apache/maven-plugin-testing/pull/8#issuecomment-520241692
Looking at the code I see: generics (Java5), @Override on inherited
interface methods (Java6). I don't see any changes that require a newer versi
SingingBush edited a comment on issue #8: target Java 8 and maven 3.6.0
URL:
https://github.com/apache/maven-plugin-testing/pull/8#issuecomment-520239859
ok, I'm going to undo the JDK and junit change so that the PR is purely
about changes needed to target the maven 3.6.0 API
edit:
SingingBush commented on issue #8: target Java 8 and maven 3.6.0
URL:
https://github.com/apache/maven-plugin-testing/pull/8#issuecomment-520239859
ok, I'm going to undo the JDK and junit change so that the PR is purely
about changes needed to target the maven 3.6.0 API
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tibor Digana closed SUREFIRE-1687.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
Assignee: Tibor Digana
We are aware of such issues where the use
Tibor17 commented on issue #8: target Java 8 and maven 3.6.0
URL:
https://github.com/apache/maven-plugin-testing/pull/8#issuecomment-520238398
Our major goal is to release Maven 3.6.x.
I do not know when Java 1.8 would be in Maven and I have not noticed any
brainstorming, plan and email
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MCOMPILER-376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16904679#comment-16904679
]
Samael Bate commented on MCOMPILER-376:
---
The JDK is moving far quicker than tool
SingingBush commented on issue #8: target Java 8 and maven 3.6.0
URL:
https://github.com/apache/maven-plugin-testing/pull/8#issuecomment-520236882
All three aspects of the PR could be viewed that way. Is there a specific
part that's concerning; JDK version, mvn version, or junit change?
Samael Bate created MPOM-222:
Summary: update target JDK from 6 to 8
Key: MPOM-222
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPOM-222
Project: Maven POMs
Issue Type: Improvement
Repo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPLUGINTESTING-61?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16904677#comment-16904677
]
Samael Bate commented on MPLUGINTESTING-61:
---
I'd agrue that 8 should now
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-92?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16904652#comment-16904652
]
Tibor Digana commented on MRESOLVER-92:
---
[~michael-o]
Please make a review and I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-92?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16904650#comment-16904650
]
Tibor Digana commented on MRESOLVER-92:
---
[~michael-o]
Done. The local build is su
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHARED-391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Scholte closed MSHARED-391.
--
Resolution: Auto Closed
Assignee: Robert Scholte
The shared component maven-repository-b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-92?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tibor Digana reassigned MRESOLVER-92:
-
Assignee: Tibor Digana
> Revert MRESOLVER-7
> --
>
> K
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-92?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16904625#comment-16904625
]
Michael Osipov commented on MRESOLVER-92:
-
I didn't commit anything because {{g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-92?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16904622#comment-16904622
]
Tibor Digana commented on MRESOLVER-92:
---
So push your local commits and we will s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-92?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16904621#comment-16904621
]
Michael Osipov commented on MRESOLVER-92:
-
No, no changes yet. I tried locally,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-92?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Osipov updated MRESOLVER-92:
Description: MRESOLVER-7 introduced subtile bugs which need to be fixed
first. (was: MRE
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-92?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16904619#comment-16904619
]
Tibor Digana commented on MRESOLVER-92:
---
[~michael-o]
Very good step!
I have chec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MDEP-658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Osipov updated MDEP-658:
Fix Version/s: wontfix-candidate
> Send dependency tree output to HTTP endpoints
> --
michael-o closed pull request #3: Update ResolverExpressionEvaluatorStub.java
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-plugin-testing/pull/3
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, ple
michael-o commented on issue #8: target Java 8 and maven 3.6.0
URL:
https://github.com/apache/maven-plugin-testing/pull/8#issuecomment-520219804
Thank you for the PR, but you wasted your time. Most of the changes will be
rejected. You can refactor your code to submit non-intrusive changes
SingingBush opened a new pull request #8: target Java 8 and maven 3.6.0
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-plugin-testing/pull/8
pretty frustrating that in 2019 people are still targeting ancient Java
versions. In this pull request I've set JDK 8 as the target and also updated to
a more
eolivelli commented on issue #55: Wagon-566
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-wagon/pull/55#issuecomment-520217781
We will test automatically against java7,8,11 and 13, win and linux
This is an automated message from the Ap
eolivelli commented on issue #55: Wagon-566
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-wagon/pull/55#issuecomment-520217810
Ok for the test
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
michael-o commented on issue #55: Wagon-566
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-wagon/pull/55#issuecomment-520210326
Yes, I think this will be sufficient.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WAGON-565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16904593#comment-16904593
]
Michael Osipov commented on WAGON-565:
--
Thanks for the explantion. As far as I unders
44 matches
Mail list logo
