vigyasharma closed issue #13114: `mergeThreadCount` is both a variable and a
method in the `ConcurrentMergeScheduler`
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13114
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
vigyasharma merged PR #14171:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14171
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene
vigyasharma commented on PR #14417:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14417#issuecomment-2764422079
Also, IIUC `IndexWriter#advanceSegmentInfosVersion()` was added to handle
similar scenarios for NRT replication (Lucene's native segment replication
implementation). I'm curious why
kkewwei commented on PR #14412:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14412#issuecomment-2764949091
Thank you for your reply. I understand your perspective. You aim to optimize
execution efficiency rather than focus on cache optimization.
In certain rare scenarios, the querycache
hanbj commented on code in PR #14268:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14268#discussion_r2020443439
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/PointInSetQuery.java:
##
@@ -108,6 +110,8 @@ protected PointInSetQuery(String field, int numDims, int
bytesPerDim, Stre
hanbj commented on code in PR #14268:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14268#discussion_r2020445557
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/PointInSetQuery.java:
##
@@ -153,6 +162,21 @@ public ScorerSupplier scorerSupplier(LeafReaderContext
context) throws IO
hanbj commented on code in PR #14268:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14268#discussion_r2020445151
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/PointInSetQuery.java:
##
@@ -153,6 +162,21 @@ public ScorerSupplier scorerSupplier(LeafReaderContext
context) throws IO
jpountz commented on PR #14418:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14418#issuecomment-2764554455
Thank you, that makes sense. So in the case when the filter rewrites to
MatchNoDocsQuery, `IndexSearcher#search` would now return immediately, while it
may currently need to wait for tas
gf2121 commented on code in PR #14333:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14333#discussion_r2006853334
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene90/blocktree/TrieBuilder.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,552 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) unde
jpountz commented on PR #14412:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14412#issuecomment-2764454882
> I am wondering if we should also make maxRamBytesUsed dynamic as well.
What is your use-case for tuning it? Related to my comment on the issue
linked to this PR, I worry a bit ab
jpountz merged PR #14412:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14412
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apa
11 matches
Mail list logo