mikemccand commented on issue #13647:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13647#issuecomment-2701096339
> I guess thius 94GB comes from `33M x 768 x 4` bytes? Frankly I never test
with indexes > ~2M docs, but maybe there is a call for the 33M-doc index in
nightlies?
Yeah ...
mikemccand commented on issue #13647:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13647#issuecomment-2701189251
@dweiss I can't tell from above -- are there other corpora that need a home
still?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, pleas
renatoh commented on PR #14311:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14311#issuecomment-2701699595
> @renatoh that seems fine, If you have a way to do it so it works. Because
they are just booleans I wasn't sure?
>
> I also can't remember if there is a way that you can signal a
rmuir commented on PR #14311:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14311#issuecomment-2701555710
@renatoh that seems fine, If you have a way to do it so it works. Because
they are just booleans I wasn't sure?
I also can't remember if there is a way that you can signal a deprecat
mayya-sharipova commented on PR #14331:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14331#issuecomment-2701756507
Evaluation is done with Luceneutil on these datasets:
Rebased against Lucene main branch:
1. **quora-E5-small**; 522931 docs; 384 dims; 7 bits quantized; cosine metri
mayya-sharipova opened a new pull request, #14331:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14331
Currently when doing merging of HNSW graphs incrementally,
we first initialize a graph from the biggest segment, and for other segments,
we rebuild the graphs completely by going through
uschindler commented on PR #14311:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14311#issuecomment-2701841157
> @renatoh that seems fine, If you have a way to do it so it works. Because
they are just booleans I wasn't sure?
>
> I also can't remember if there is a way that you can signal
renatoh commented on PR #14311:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14311#issuecomment-2701225973
@rmuir Sorry for rushing, but have you seen my suggestion regarding
deprecating the constructor?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
lpld commented on PR #14078:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14078#issuecomment-2702238939
@benwtrent Thanks for your response, it was quite helpful. Could you please
also share other parameters of your benchmark (ndoc, maxConn, beamWidthIndex,
fanout, etc.) ?
I was able t
msokolov commented on PR #14331:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14331#issuecomment-2701861504
oh, this is a neat idea! Looks like we sacrifice some query performance (in
some cases) for a big improvement in indexing time. I wonder if we've tried
other values of `beamWidth` to se
dweiss opened a new issue, #14332:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14332
### Description
Apache's reporting utility is currently broken. I wrote a small gh workflow
to generate the stats on demand.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
dweiss commented on issue #14332:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14332#issuecomment-2701997460
Oops, something is not working with gh cli. Looking.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
dweiss commented on issue #14332:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14332#issuecomment-2701993756
https://github.com/apache/lucene/actions/workflows/activity-report.yml
You have to run it manually, providing the time window:
. If there is anything
else I should place there, let
dweiss closed issue #14332: Add a workflow generating gh stats for board
summary reports
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14332
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specif
dweiss commented on issue #14332:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14332#issuecomment-2702057560
Ok, working now.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To re
dweiss commented on issue #14305:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14305#issuecomment-2702086799
Still not working -
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Lucene/job/Lucene-NightlyTests-main/lastBuild/console
```
The Develocity server (develocity.apache.org) rejected the
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #13914:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13914#issuecomment-2702387083
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contributi
19 matches
Mail list logo
